Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-06 19:45 UTC

singular-labs / Singular-Cordova-SDK

JavaScript · Objective-C · JavaMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗

singular-labs/Singular-Cordova-SDK holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (79/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (17/100). It was last updated 36 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

41
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

41
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SingularOrganization · verified domain
35 followers108 public repossince Jun 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmsingular_cordova_sdk1.9.03,3612236 days agocordova-ioscordova-android

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 36 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push36
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 21 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 36 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~113.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tag1.9.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release36
mean_days_between_releases113.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47/80Monthly downloads — 3,361 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessingular_cordova_sdk
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,361
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.355
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.6/30PR acceptance — 23/27 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs23
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
11.2/25Owner reach — 35 followers of singular-labs
25/25Track record — 108 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers35
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginsingular-labs
public_repos108
account_age_days4,488

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history — 22 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessingular_cordova_sdk
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

17Critical · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 13/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories39
affected_packages12
assessed_packages136
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 9
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 136 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

21At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.8/40Legible commit history — 23 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.371
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 62
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
48.5/55Manageable file sizes — 2/17 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes200,143
source_files_sampled17
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

0GitHub stars
4contributors
1commits, last 12 months
36days since last push
21releases
2bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'com.singular.singularapp4' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-06 19:44 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 13/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained1 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 136

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 136 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@netflix/nerror1.1.3indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@xmldom/xmldom0.9.12indirect
npmabbrev1.1.1indirect
npmabbrev4.0.0indirect
npmandroid-versions2.2.1indirect
npmansi0.3.1indirect
npmassert-plus1.0.0indirect
npmat-least-node1.0.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbase64-js1.1.2indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbig-integer1.6.51indirect
npmbplist-creator0.0.7indirect
npmbplist-creator0.1.0indirect
npmbplist-parser0.0.6indirect
npmbplist-parser0.1.1indirect
npmbplist-parser0.2.0indirect
npmbplist-parser0.3.1indirect
npmbplist-parser0.3.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcolors1.4.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcordova-android15.1.0indirect
npmcordova-common4.0.2indirect
npmcordova-common6.0.0indirect
npmcordova-custom-config5.1.1indirect
npmcordova-ios6.2.0indirect
npmcordova-plugin-dialogs2.0.2indirect
npmcordova-plugin-firebasex18.0.7indirect
npmcordova-plugin-purchase11.0.0indirect
npmcordova-plugin-wkwebview-file-xhr3.1.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmdedent0.7.0indirect
npmdedent1.7.2indirect
npmelementtree0.1.7indirect
npmendent1.4.1indirect
npmendent2.1.0indirect
npmexeca5.1.1indirect
npmextsprintf1.4.1indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfast-json-parse1.0.3indirect
npmfastq1.13.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfs-extra9.1.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmget-stream6.0.1indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.10indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npmhuman-signals2.1.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npminterpret1.4.0indirect
npmios-sim8.0.2indirect
npmis-core-module2.9.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-stream2.0.1indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisexe4.0.0indirect
npmjsonfile6.1.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmimic-fn2.1.0indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmnopt1.0.9indirect
npmnopt5.0.0indirect
npmnopt9.0.0indirect
npmnpm-run-path4.0.1indirect
npmobjectorarray1.0.5indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmonetime5.1.2indirect
npmp-finally1.0.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpify4.0.1indirect
npmplist2.0.1indirect
npmplist3.1.1indirect
npmproperties-parser0.6.0indirect
npmq1.5.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmread-chunk3.2.0indirect
npmrechoir0.6.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.1indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsax1.1.4indirect
npmsax1.6.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmshelljs0.7.8indirect
npmshelljs0.8.5indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmsimctl2.0.3indirect
npmsimple-plist0.2.1indirect
npmsimple-plist1.3.1indirect
npmsingular_cordova_sdk1.9.0indirect
npmstream-buffers2.2.0indirect
npmstring-argv0.3.2indirect
npmstrip-bom4.0.0indirect
npmstrip-final-newline2.0.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtail0.4.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtostr0.1.0indirect
npmunderscore1.13.4indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.0indirect
npmunorm1.6.0indirect
npmuntildify4.0.0indirect
npmuuid3.4.0indirect
npmuuid7.0.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhich6.0.1indirect
npmwith-open-file0.1.7indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmxcode1.1.0indirect
npmxcode3.0.1indirect
npmxml-escape1.1.0indirect
npmxml-js1.6.11indirect
npmxmlbuilder15.1.1indirect
npmxmlbuilder8.2.2indirect
npmxmldom0.1.31indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 136 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
plist2.0.1indirectcritical13.0.5
simple-plist0.2.1indirectcritical11.3.1
xmldom0.1.31indirectcritical160.9.12
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh85.0.12
braces3.0.3indirecthigh1—
cross-spawn7.0.3indirecthigh17.0.5
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
shelljs0.7.8indirecthigh20.8.5
underscore1.13.4indirecthigh11.13.8
uuid3.4.0indirecthigh113.0.1
uuid7.0.3indirecthigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.