Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 06:41 UTC

sleuth-io / sx

Skill sharing made easy

Go · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 305 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolDesktop applicationLibraryhow this is determined

sleuth-io/sx holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SleuthOrganization
20 followers29 public repossince Nov 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/sleuth-io/sx/v2v2.3.9-2917 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,143 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,143
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year37
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 16 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.3.9
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release16
mean_days_between_releases3.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.3/60Stars — 305 stars
10.3/25Forks — 18 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks18
stars305
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.522
How it's scored
37.2/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 174/190 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs174
open_issues6
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.885
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of sleuth-io
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsleuth-io
public_repos29
account_age_days2,510

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history — 29 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/sleuth-io/sx/v2
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://sleuth-io.github.io/sx/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagents, ai, anthropic, claude, cli, developer-tools, golang, llm, mcp, package-manager, prompt-engineering, skills
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://sleuth-io.github.io/sx/
docs_sitehttps://sleuth-io.github.io/sx/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.1

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 92 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.939
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,797
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — app/frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapp/frontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 5/610 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes502,155
source_files_sampled610
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — internal/vault/graphql/operations/add_asset_pull_request_file_change.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/app_plugin_policy.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/app_plugin_storage.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_audit_log.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_gid.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_installations.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_usage_events.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/benchmarks.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/bot_api_keys.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/bot_installed.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/collection_installs.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/collections.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_asset.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_asset_pull_request.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_bot_api_key.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_bot_runtime_token.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_team.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/delete_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/delete_bot_api_key.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/delete_team.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/find_user.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/get_me.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/import_audit_events.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/install_skill_to_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/list_bots.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/list_teams.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/org_info.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/org_repositories.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/quality.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/remove_asset_installations.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/remove_team_member.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/rename_asset.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/repo_mono_configs.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/revoke_bot_runtime_tokens.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/set_asset_installations.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/set_team_admin.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/uninstall_asset_targets.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/uninstall_skill_from_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/update_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/update_team.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/vault_asset_lookup.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/vault_assets.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/schema.graphql
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesinternal/vault/graphql/operations/add_asset_pull_request_file_change.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/app_plugin_policy.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/app_plugin_storage.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_audit_log.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_gid.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_installations.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/asset_usage_events.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/benchmarks.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/bot_api_keys.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/bot_installed.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/collection_installs.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/collections.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_asset.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_asset_pull_request.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_bot_api_key.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_bot_runtime_token.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/create_team.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/delete_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/delete_bot_api_key.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/delete_team.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/find_user.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/get_me.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/import_audit_events.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/install_skill_to_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/list_bots.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/list_teams.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/org_info.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/org_repositories.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/quality.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/remove_asset_installations.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/remove_team_member.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/rename_asset.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/repo_mono_configs.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/revoke_bot_runtime_tokens.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/set_asset_installations.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/set_team_admin.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/uninstall_asset_targets.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/uninstall_skill_from_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/update_bot.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/update_team.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/vault_asset_lookup.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/operations/vault_assets.graphql, internal/vault/graphql/schema.graphql
interfaces_expected_of—

Key facts

305GitHub stars
7contributors
1,143commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
6open issues
Go, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿
0Stars
18Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201832025-122026-052026-08
Major 2Minor 19Patch 78
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 06:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 30
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocharm.land/bubbles/v2v2.2.0go.mod
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.9go.mod
Gocharm.land/lipgloss/v2v2.0.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/Khan/genqlientv0.8.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/semver/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/creativeprojects/go-selfupdatev1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofrs/flockv0.13.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.24go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/muesli/reflowv0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/browserv0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141cgo.mod
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/schollz/progressbar/v3v3.19.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/tailscale/hujsonv0.0.0-20260727124030-b80ff77dac4fgo.mod
Gogithub.com/wailsapp/wails/v2v2.15.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/zalando/go-keyringv0.2.8go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
RubyGemsgithub-pages—site/Gemfile
RubyGemsjekyll-feed—site/Gemfile
RubyGemsjekyll-seo-tag—site/Gemfile
RubyGemswebrick—site/Gemfile
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.