Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 16:18 UTC

smorsic / pacwich

Monorepo tooling that works directly with Bun, pnpm, and npm workspaces and orchestrates package.json scripts, with a CLI and TypeScript library API. Zero required config. AI-friendly and human-friendly documentation. (formerly bun-workspaces)

TypeScriptMIT★ 60 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Dec 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#api#bun#cli#javascript#monorepo#npm#npm-package#typescript#workspace#workspaces#ai#lightweight#pnpm#pnpm-workspace

smorsic/pacwich holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (37/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Smorsic LabsOrganization
1 follower5 public repossince Nov 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

92Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence — 40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 436 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year436
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year40

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 76 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count76
latest_release_tagpacwich-v0.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak
How it's scored
28.7/60Stars — 60 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars60
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.996

Issue & PR responsiveness

49Weak
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 121/125 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs121
open_issues2
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of smorsic
9/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginsmorsic
public_repos5
account_age_days602
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pacwich.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi, bun, cli, javascript, monorepo, npm, npm-package, typescript, workspace, workspaces, ai, lightweight, pnpm, pnpm-workspace
has_wikino
homepagehttps://pacwich.dev
docs_sitehttps://pacwich.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

77Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

77Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes49,064
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

95Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — .agents/skills/agent-qa/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, workspaces/libraries/pacwich-common/tsconfig.json, workspaces/meta/config/base/tsconfig.json, workspaces/meta/config/rspress/tsconfig.json, workspaces/meta/tsconfig.json, workspaces/packages/pacwich/tsconfig.json, workspaces/sandboxes/local-vs-release/tsconfig.json, workspaces/sandboxes/web-cli/tsconfig.json, workspaces/web/documentation-website/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs.agents/skills/agent-qa/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, workspaces/libraries/pacwich-common/tsconfig.json, workspaces/meta/config/base/tsconfig.json, workspaces/meta/config/rspress/tsconfig.json, workspaces/meta/tsconfig.json, workspaces/packages/pacwich/tsconfig.json, workspaces/sandboxes/local-vs-release/tsconfig.json, workspaces/sandboxes/web-cli/tsconfig.json, workspaces/web/documentation-website/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/557 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes80,914
source_files_sampled557
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

60GitHub stars
2contributors
436commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
76releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10
7.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 16:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 64

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 64 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@demo/core*indirect
npm@demo/core1.0.0indirect
npm@demo/utils*indirect
npm@demo/utils1.0.0indirect
npm@demo/web1.0.0indirect
npm@eslint/js^9.39.4indirect
npm@fontsource/unifontexcatalog:webindirect
npm@modelcontextprotocol/inspectorcatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npm@rsbuild/core^2.0.8indirect
npm@rsbuild/plugin-node-polyfill^1.4.6indirect
npm@rsbuild/plugin-react^2.0.0indirect
npm@rsbuild/plugin-svgrcatalog:webindirect
npm@rslib/corecatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npm@rspress/corecatalog:webindirect
npm@rspress/plugin-client-redirectscatalog:webindirect
npm@rspress/plugin-sitemapcatalog:webindirect
npm@types/bun^1.3.14indirect
npm@types/lodashcatalog:webindirect
npm@types/node^25.9.1indirect
npm@types/reactcatalog:webindirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.0indirect
npm@types/react-syntax-highlightercatalog:webindirect
npm@types/semvercatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npm@types/shell-quotecatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^8.59.4indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^8.59.4indirect
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.11.0indirect
npm@xterm/headlesscatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npm@xterm/xterm^6.0.0indirect
npmajvcatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npmbw-web-service-shared0.2.0indirect
npmcommandercatalog:pacwich-prodindirect
npmdts-bundle-generatorcatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npmeslint^9.39.4indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.32.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-react^7.37.5indirect
npmeslint-plugin-react-hooks^7.1.1indirect
npmglobals^16.5.0indirect
npmhusky^9.1.7indirect
npmjiticatalog:pacwich-prodindirect
npmjson-schema-to-ts^3.1.1indirect
npmknipcatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npmlint-staged^17.0.8indirect
npmlodashcatalog:webindirect
npmmemfs^4.17.0indirect
npmpacwichlatestindirect
npmpath-browserify^1.0.1indirect
npmportless^0.13.1indirect
npmprettier^3.8.3indirect
npmreactcatalog:webindirect
npmreact-arboristcatalog:webindirect
npmreact-domcatalog:webindirect
npmreact-iconscatalog:webindirect
npmreact-routercatalog:webindirect
npmreact-router-domcatalog:webindirect
npmreact-syntax-highlightercatalog:webindirect
npmsemvercatalog:pacwich-prodindirect
npmshell-quotecatalog:pacwich-prodindirect
npmsucrasecatalog:pacwich-prodindirect
npmtypescript^5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint^8.59.4indirect
npmvitestcatalog:pacwich-devindirect
npmyamlcatalog:pacwich-prodindirect
npmzustandcatalog:webindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with smorsic/pacwich. Read them side by side →

98apify/crawleeCrawlee—A web scraping and browser automation library for Node.js to build reliable crawlers. In JavaScript and TypeScript. Extract data for AI, LLMs, RAG, or GPTs. Download HTML, PDF, JPG, PNG, and other files from websites. Works with Puppeteer, Playwright, Cheerio, JSDOM, and raw HTTP. Both headful and headless mode. With proxy rotation.Exceptional98nrwl/nxThe Monorepo Platform that amplifies both developers and AI agents. Nx optimizes your builds, scales your CI, and fixes failed PRs automatically. Ship in half the time.Exceptional98immich-app/immichHigh performance self-hosted photo and video management solution.Exceptional98n8n-io/n8nFair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.Exceptional98microsoft/typespecExceptional98slackapi/bolt-jsA framework to build Slack apps using JavaScriptExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.