Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-01 01:12 UTC

snodo-dev / snodo

AI-native Software Development Lifecycle protocol engine

PythonApache-2.0★ 6 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryTerminal interfacehow this is determined

snodo-dev/snodo holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (51/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

snodo.devOrganization
2 followers1 public reposince Jun 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIsnodo0.19.22,174300 days agoaisdlcagentsprotocolgovernancellm

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,798 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,798
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 22 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv0.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars6
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges11
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.5/80Monthly downloads — 2,174 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessnodo
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,174
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
41/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
23.3/30PR acceptance — 14/18 decided PRs merged
12.1/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 13/14 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs14
open_issues14
closed_issues561
prs_merged_7d13
prs_decided_7d13
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d14
issue_closed_ratio0.976
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d13
first_time_prs_decided_30d14

Ownership & stewardship

36Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of snodo-dev
2.9/25Track record — 1 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsnodo-dev
public_repos1
account_age_days121

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 30 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessnodo
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://snodo.dev
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://snodo.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.2/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Passing
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.9

Dependency advisories

89Excellent
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: gitpython 3.1.61 (moderate)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages2
assessed_packages215
unassessed_packages24
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 215 resolved dependencies against OSV. 24 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

34At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.6/40Legible commit history — 63 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.63
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

85Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — packages/snodo-core/src/snodo/py.typed, snodo/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/snodo-core/src/snodo/py.typed, snodo/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (packages/snodo-core/src/snodo/py.typed, snodo/py.typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes — 9/564 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes108,311
source_files_sampled564
oversized_source_files9

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

6GitHub stars
1contributors
1,798commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
14open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:snodo@0.19.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-062026-072026-09
Major 0Minor 4Patch 5
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-01 01:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
0Code-ReviewFound 0/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIsnodo-core==0.19.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsnodo-tools==0.19.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsnodo-foundation==0.19.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsnodo-engine==0.19.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsnodo-mcp==0.19.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsnodo-provider-github==0.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPItextual>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27.0pyproject.toml
PyPIGitPython>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlitellm>=1.80,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 239

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 215 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIgitpython—direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.61direct
PyPIhttpx—direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIlitellm—direct
PyPIlitellm1.98.0direct
PyPIpydantic—direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPIpyyaml—direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIsnodo-core0.18.0direct
PyPIsnodo-core0.19.0direct
PyPIsnodo-core0.7.2direct
PyPIsnodo-engine0.19.0direct
PyPIsnodo-foundation0.19.0direct
PyPIsnodo-foundation0.7.2direct
PyPIsnodo-mcp0.19.0direct
PyPIsnodo-provider-github0.18.0direct
PyPIsnodo-tools0.18.0direct
PyPIsnodo-tools0.19.0direct
PyPIsnodo-tools0.7.2direct
PyPItextual8.2.8direct
PyPItyper0.27.2direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIboto31.43.83indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.83indirect
PyPIcbor26.1.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIchardet7.6.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.1indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdatasets5.0.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocker—indirect
PyPIdocker7.2.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.23indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfastcore1.14.5indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIfilelock—indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.5indirect
PyPIfonttools4.64.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.4.0indirect
PyPIgenbadge1.1.3indirect
PyPIghapi1.1.1indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.5indirect
PyPIgrimp3.14indirect
PyPIgrpclib0.4.9indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.6.0indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhttpx22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.29.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.155.2indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimport-linter2.12indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.9.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke3.0.3indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.16.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonpatch1.33indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.1indirect
PyPIlangchain—indirect
PyPIlangchain1.3.18indirect
PyPIlangchain-classic1.0.8indirect
PyPIlangchain-community—indirect
PyPIlangchain-community0.4.2indirect
PyPIlangchain-core—indirect
PyPIlangchain-core1.6.1indirect
PyPIlangchain-protocol0.0.19indirect
PyPIlangchain-text-splitters1.1.2indirect
PyPIlanggraph—indirect
PyPIlanggraph1.2.11indirect
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint4.2.0indirect
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint-sqlite—indirect
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint-sqlite3.1.1indirect
PyPIlanggraph-prebuilt1.1.0indirect
PyPIlanggraph-sdk0.4.4indirect
PyPIlangsmith0.11.2indirect
PyPIlinkify-it-py2.2.0indirect
PyPIloro1.13.2indirect
PyPImando0.7.1indirect
PyPImarimo—indirect
PyPImarimo0.24.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib—indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1indirect
PyPImcp—indirect
PyPImcp1.29.1indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImodal1.5.5indirect
PyPImsgspec0.21.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImultiprocess0.70.19indirect
PyPInarwhals2.25.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy—indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.2indirect
PyPIopenai2.54.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.12.0indirect
PyPIormsgpack1.12.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandas—indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.5indirect
PyPIparamiko5.0.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.5indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIpsutil—indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpygithub—indirect
PyPIpygithub2.10.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt—indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.1indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.2indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-gitlab—indirect
PyPIpython-gitlab8.6.0indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.2.0indirect
PyPIradon6.0.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.8.31indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.15.16indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIscipy1.18.1indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnodo0.19.0indirect
PyPIsnodo-provider-gitlab0.18.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.2indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.52indirect
PyPIsqlite-vec0.1.9indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.8indirect
PyPIstarlette1.6.0indirect
PyPIswebench5.0.2indirect
PyPIsynchronicity0.12.5indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItiktoken0.14.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.1indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItomlkit—indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItypes-certifi2021.10.8.3indirect
PyPItypes-toml0.10.8.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIunidiff1.0.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuuid-utils0.17.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.7indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.1.1indirect
PyPIxxhash4.0.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 215 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 24 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
virtualenv21.7.7indirecthigh621.7.13
gitpython3.1.61directmoderate13.1.62

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with snodo-dev/snodo. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99google/adk-pythonAn open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional98langchain-ai/langchainThe agent engineering platform.Exceptional98strands-agents/toolsA set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.Exceptional98Netflix/metaflowBuild, Manage and Deploy AI/ML SystemsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.