Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 05:22 UTC

softprops / action-gh-release

📦 :octocat: GitHub Action for creating GitHub Releases

TypeScriptMIT★ 5,748 stars⑂ 638 forkssince Aug 2019View on GitHub ↗

softprops/action-gh-release holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (53/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Doug TangrenPersonal account

968 followers475 public repossince Mar 2008https://www.mongodb.com/atlas

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 11 days ago
17.3/36	Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 126 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	126
human_commit_share	0.57
days_since_last_push	11
active_weeks_last_year	25

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 43 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 45 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~24.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	43
latest_release_tag	v3.0.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	45
mean_days_between_releases	24.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

91Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 5,748 stars
23.4/25	Forks — 638 forks
7.6/15	Watchers — 24 watchers

Inputs used

forks	638
stars	5,748
watchers	24
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 73 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	73
top_contributor_share	0.522

Issue & PR responsiveness

48Weak

How it's scored

29.5/42	Issue resolution — 70% of issues closed
18.7/30	PR acceptance — 271/435 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	271
open_issues	114
closed_issues	270
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.703
closed_unmerged_prs	164
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

71Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
21.5/25	Owner reach — 968 followers of softprops
25/25	Track record — 475 public repos, account ~18 yr old

Inputs used

followers	968
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	softprops
public_repos	475
account_age_days	6,750

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	github-actions, github-releases
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	182
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 182 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 49 of 57 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.86
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	3,803

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 43 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.43

Code legibility for models

95Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
50.4/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/12 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	85,476
source_files_sampled	12
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

5,748GitHub stars

73contributors

126commits, last 12 months

11days since last push

43releases

1bus factor

114open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 638 ⇿

0Stars

638Forks

42Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 6Patch 34

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10

6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 05:22 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@actions/core	`^3.0.1`	package.json
npm	@actions/github	`^9.1.1`	package.json
npm	@octokit/plugin-retry	`^8.1.1`	package.json
npm	@octokit/plugin-throttling	`^11.0.5`	package.json
npm	glob	`^13.0.6`	package.json
npm	mime-types	`^3.0.2`	package.json

All dependencies 182

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 176 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@actions/core	`3.0.1`	direct
npm	@actions/github	`9.1.1`	direct
npm	@octokit/plugin-retry	`8.1.1`	direct
npm	@octokit/plugin-throttling	`11.0.5`	direct
npm	glob	`13.0.6`	direct
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	direct
npm	@actions/exec	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@actions/http-client	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	@actions/http-client	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@actions/io	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@bcoe/v8-coverage	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	@octokit/auth-token	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/core	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	@octokit/endpoint	`11.0.3`	indirect
npm	@octokit/graphql	`9.0.3`	indirect
npm	@octokit/openapi-types	`27.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/openapi-types	`28.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest	`14.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods	`17.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request	`10.0.8`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request-error	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/types	`16.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/types	`17.0.0`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.139.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@standard-schema/spec	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/mime-types	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.13.3`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/coverage-v8	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	ast-v8-to-istanbul	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	before-after-hook	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	bottleneck	`2.19.5`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.9`	indirect
npm	chai	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-content-type-parse	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	html-escaper	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-coverage	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-report	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-reports	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`10.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-with-bigint	`3.5.7`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.2.7`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	magicast	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.4`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	obug	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.25`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.9.6`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.3`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	tunnel	`0.0.6`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	undici	`6.28.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.18.2`	indirect
npm	universal-user-agent	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.1.5`	indirect
npm	vitest	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 182 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records