Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-03 04:09 UTC

sonata-project / SonataMediaBundle

Symfony SonataMediaBundle

PHPMIT★ 462 stars⑂ 481 forkssince Nov 2010View on GitHub ↗

KindPluginLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#php #symfony-bundle #bundle #dailymotion #file #media #pdf #sonata #symfony #upload #vimeo #youtube

sonata-project/SonataMediaBundle holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Vitality (44/100). It was last updated 92 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sonata ProjectOrganization

68 followers55 public repossince Sep 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	sonata-project/media-bundle	4.20.0	39,286	117	226 days ago	media file sonata upload pdf youtube dailymotion vimeo

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

44Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

27At Risk

How it's scored

9.9/36	Push recency — last push 92 days ago
5.5/36	Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
11.5/18	Commit volume — 18 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	18
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	92
active_weeks_last_year	8

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 99 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 226 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~72.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	99
latest_release_tag	4.20.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	226
mean_days_between_releases	72.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

74Good

How it's scored

43.2/60	Stars — 462 stars
22.3/25	Forks — 481 forks
8.8/15	Watchers — 40 watchers

Inputs used

forks	481
stars	462
watchers	40
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

74Good

How it's scored

61.3/80	Monthly downloads — 39,286 downloads/month across packagist
13/20	Registry dependents — 87 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	sonata-project/media-bundle
dependents	87
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	5,683,567
monthly_downloads	39,286
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

77Good

How it's scored

36/54	Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 22% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 50 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	3
contributors_sampled	100
top_contributor_share	0.222

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

41.8/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
23.8/30	PR acceptance — 1,431/1,803 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

merged_prs	1,431
open_issues	3
closed_issues	679
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.996
closed_unmerged_prs	372
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
13.2/25	Owner reach — 68 followers of sonata-project
24.7/25	Track record — 55 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	68
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	sonata-project
public_repos	55
account_age_days	5,798

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 226 days ago
20/20	Version history — 117 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	sonata-project/media-bundle
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	226

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.sonata-project.org/projects/SonataMediaBundle
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	php, symfony-bundle, bundle, dailymotion, file, media, pdf, sonata, symfony, upload, vimeo, youtube
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.sonata-project.org/projects/SonataMediaBundle
docs_site	https://docs.sonata-project.org/projects/SonataMediaBundle
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

39Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5	Code-Review — Found 12/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 50 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	3.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	3
unassessed_packages	64
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 64 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

36Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.3/40	Legible commit history — 68 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.68
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11	Static type checking
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/217 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	26,099
source_files_sampled	217
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

462GitHub stars

100contributors

18commits, last 12 months

92days since last push

99releases

3bus factor

3open issues

Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 481 ⇿

0Stars

481Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 58Patch 37

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10

3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 04:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5	CI-Tests	13 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4	Code-Review	Found 12/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10	Contributors	project has 50 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 35

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	doctrine/persistence	`^3.0.2 \|\| ^4.0`	composer.json
Packagist	imagine/imagine	`^1.3`	composer.json
Packagist	knplabs/gaufrette	`^0.10 \|\| ^0.11`	composer.json
Packagist	nyholm/psr7	`^1.4`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-client	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-message	`^1.0 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/log	`^2.0 \|\| ^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	sonata-project/doctrine-extensions	`^1.13 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	sonata-project/form-extensions	`^1.4 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	sonata-project/twig-extensions	`^1.3 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/asset	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/config	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/console	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/finder	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/form	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/framework-bundle	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/http-client	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/http-foundation	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/mime	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/routing	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/security-bundle	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/security-core	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/translation	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/translation-contracts	`^2.0 \|\| ^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/twig-bridge	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/twig-bundle	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/validator	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.3 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	twig/string-extra	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	twig/twig	`^3.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 67

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 35 direct and 32 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	doctrine/persistence	`—`	direct
Packagist	imagine/imagine	`—`	direct
Packagist	knplabs/gaufrette	`—`	direct
Packagist	nyholm/psr7	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-client	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-message	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`—`	direct
Packagist	sonata-project/doctrine-extensions	`—`	direct
Packagist	sonata-project/form-extensions	`—`	direct
Packagist	sonata-project/twig-extensions	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/asset	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/config	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/console	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/finder	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/form	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/framework-bundle	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/http-client	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/http-foundation	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/mime	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/routing	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/security-bundle	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/security-core	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/translation	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/translation-contracts	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/twig-bridge	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/twig-bundle	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/validator	`—`	direct
Packagist	twig/string-extra	`—`	direct
Packagist	twig/twig	`—`	direct
Packagist	async-aws/simple-s3	`—`	indirect
Packagist	aws/aws-sdk-php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	dama/doctrine-test-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/doctrine-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/mongodb-odm	`—`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/orm	`—`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	knplabs/knp-menu-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	liip/imagine-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	masterminds/html5	`—`	indirect
Packagist	matthiasnoback/symfony-config-test	`—`	indirect
Packagist	matthiasnoback/symfony-dependency-injection-test	`—`	indirect
Packagist	microsoft/azure-storage-blob	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/extension-installer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-strict-rules	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-symfony	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	rector/rector	`—`	indirect
Packagist	sonata-project/admin-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	sonata-project/block-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	sonata-project/classification-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	sonata-project/doctrine-orm-admin-bundle	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/browser-kit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/messenger	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/security-csrf	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`6.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-rtd-theme	`1.2.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 64 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records