Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 14:40 UTC

sonos / dinghy

Easier cross-compilation for phones and single boards computers

RustCustom license★ 417 stars⑂ 51 forkssince Nov 2016View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

sonos/dinghy holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (54/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sonos, Inc.Organization · verified domain

155 followers28 public repossince Dec 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	dinghy	0.3.0	24	32	1187 days ago	—
crates.io	dinghy-lib	0.8.6	4,305	89	3 days ago	android cargo ios mobile tests
crates.io	dinghy-test	0.8.6	35,305	93	3 days ago	android cargo ios mobile tests
crates.io	cargo-dinghy	0.8.6	4,253	89	3 days ago	android cargo ios mobile tests
crates.io	dinghy-build	0.8.6	31,339	94	3 days ago	android cargo ios mobile tests

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

65Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
4.2/36	Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
14.6/18	Commit volume — 41 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	41
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	6

Release discipline

83Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~95.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	0.8.6
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	3
mean_days_between_releases	95.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good

How it's scored

42.5/60	Stars — 417 stars
14.2/25	Forks — 51 forks
7.9/15	Watchers — 27 watchers

Inputs used

forks	51
stars	417
watchers	27
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

44Weak

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

81Excellent

How it's scored

65/80	Monthly downloads — 75,202 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	dinghy-lib, dinghy-test, cargo-dinghy, dinghy-build
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	2,364,999
monthly_downloads	75,202
unverified_packages_excluded	dinghy

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

41Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 63% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 29 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	29
top_contributor_share	0.633

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good

How it's scored

31.2/42	Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
28.4/30	PR acceptance — 178/188 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	178
open_issues	20
closed_issues	58
prs_merged_7d	3
prs_decided_7d	3
prs_merged_30d	4
prs_decided_30d	4
issue_closed_ratio	0.744
closed_unmerged_prs	10
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

88Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
15.8/25	Owner reach — 155 followers of sonos
22.6/25	Track record — 28 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	155
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	sonos
public_repos	28
account_age_days	4,994

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20	Version history — 94 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	dinghy, dinghy-lib, dinghy-test, cargo-dinghy, dinghy-build
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://medium.com/snips-ai/dinghy-painless-rust-tests-and-benches-on-ios-and-android-c9f94f81d305#.c2sx7two8
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cargo, rust, testing-tools, mobile
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://medium.com/snips-ai/dinghy-painless-rust-tests-and-benches-on-ios-and-android-c9f94f81d305#.c2sx7two8
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 5/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

85Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: json 0.12.4 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,663 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	129
unassessed_packages	24
affected_by_severity	unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 129 resolved dependencies against OSV. 24 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

57Moderate

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.7/40	Legible commit history — 22 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.22
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	3,175

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml, dinghy-build/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml, dinghy-build/Cargo.toml, dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml, dinghy-test/Cargo.toml, legacy/Cargo.toml, test-ws/Cargo.toml, test-ws/test-app/Cargo.toml, test-ws/test-bin/Cargo.toml, test-ws/test-proc-macro/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/38 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	22,021
source_files_sampled	38
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

417GitHub stars

29contributors

41commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

20open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 51 ⇿

0Stars

51Forks

98Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 4Patch 49

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 14:39 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 5/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10	Contributors	project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	18 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 33

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	dinghy-lib	`—`	cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`0.4`	cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap	`4`	cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml
crates.io	env_logger	`0.10`	cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.57`	cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml
crates.io	cargo_metadata	`—`	cargo-dinghy/Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.58`	dinghy-build/Cargo.toml
crates.io	cc	`1`	dinghy-build/Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`0.4`	dinghy-build/Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	dinghy-build	`—`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	dirs	`5`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	filetime	`0.2`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`0.4`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	itertools	`0.10`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	plist	`1`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex	`1.0`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	json	`0.12`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ignore	`0.4`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	toml	`0.7`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	shell-escape	`0.1`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	walkdir	`2.0`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	which	`=4.0`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	shellexpand	`3`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	semver	`1`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	cargo_metadata	`—`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	cargo-platform	`—`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	colored	`2.0.0`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.4.0`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	dyn-clone	`1.0.8`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	fs-err	`2.11.0`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tempfile	`3.1`	dinghy-lib/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 153

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 51 direct and 102 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	direct
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.103`	direct
crates.io	cargo-platform	`0.1.8`	direct
crates.io	cargo_metadata	`0.14.0`	direct
crates.io	cc	`—`	direct
crates.io	cc	`1.2.67`	direct
crates.io	clap	`—`	direct
crates.io	clap	`4.6.1`	direct
crates.io	colored	`—`	direct
crates.io	colored	`2.2.0`	direct
crates.io	dirs	`—`	direct
crates.io	dirs	`5.0.1`	direct
crates.io	dirs	`6.0.0`	direct
crates.io	dyn-clone	`—`	direct
crates.io	dyn-clone	`1.0.20`	direct
crates.io	env_logger	`—`	direct
crates.io	env_logger	`0.10.2`	direct
crates.io	filetime	`—`	direct
crates.io	filetime	`0.2.29`	direct
crates.io	fs-err	`—`	direct
crates.io	fs-err	`2.11.0`	direct
crates.io	ignore	`—`	direct
crates.io	ignore	`0.4.28`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`—`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`0.10.5`	direct
crates.io	json	`—`	direct
crates.io	json	`0.12.4`	direct
crates.io	lazy_static	`—`	direct
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	direct
crates.io	log	`—`	direct
crates.io	log	`0.4.33`	direct
crates.io	plist	`—`	direct
crates.io	plist	`1.10.0`	direct
crates.io	regex	`—`	direct
crates.io	regex	`1.13.0`	direct
crates.io	semver	`—`	direct
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	direct
crates.io	serde	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	direct
crates.io	shell-escape	`—`	direct
crates.io	shell-escape	`0.1.5`	direct
crates.io	shellexpand	`—`	direct
crates.io	shellexpand	`3.1.2`	direct
crates.io	tempfile	`—`	direct
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	direct
crates.io	toml	`—`	direct
crates.io	toml	`0.7.8`	direct
crates.io	walkdir	`—`	direct
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	direct
crates.io	which	`—`	direct
crates.io	which	`4.0.2`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	bstr	`1.12.3`	indirect
crates.io	camino	`1.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.20`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.22`	indirect
crates.io	deranged	`0.5.8`	indirect
crates.io	dinghy	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	dirs-sys	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	dirs-sys	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	globset	`0.4.18`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hermit-abi	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	humantime	`2.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	is-terminal	`0.4.17`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	indirect
crates.io	libredox	`0.1.18`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	num-conv	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	option-ext	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	powerfmt	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	quick-xml	`0.41.0`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.46`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	redox_users	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	redox_users	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.15`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.150`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`0.6.9`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.118`	indirect
crates.io	termcolor	`1.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	time	`0.3.53`	indirect
crates.io	time-core	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	time-macros	`0.2.31`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`0.6.11`	indirect
crates.io	toml_edit	`0.19.15`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.48.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`0.5.40`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.22`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 129 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 24 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
json	`0.12.4`	direct	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records