Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 09:30 UTC

sparkutils / quality

A Quality Spark DQ and transformation Library

ScalaApache-2.0★ 5 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

sparkutils/quality holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

sparkutilsOrganization
0 followers18 public repossince Nov 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 16 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume501 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year501
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year40
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases9 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 22 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~156.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tagv0.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases156.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars5
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
36/42Issue resolution86% of issues closed
10/30PR acceptance1/3 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues20
closed_issues120
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.857
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach0 followers of sparkutils
16.8/25Track record18 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsparkutils
public_repos18
account_age_days1,375

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://sparkutils.github.io/quality/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdata-ingestion, data-quality, databricks, lambda, spark, data-transformation
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://sparkutils.github.io/quality/
docs_sitehttps://sparkutils.github.io/quality/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities126 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories276
affected_packages27
assessed_packages89
unassessed_packages25
affected_by_severitycritical 4, high 5, moderate 2, unknown 16
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 89 resolved dependencies against OSV. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history95 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.95
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapapi/pom.xml, api_stub/pom.xml, connect_api/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingScala (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsapi/pom.xml, api_stub/pom.xml, connect_api/pom.xml, core/pom.xml, pom.xml, server/pom.xml, shared_server/pom.xml, testShades/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeScala (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes2/347 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageScala
largest_source_bytes89,899
source_files_sampled347
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

5GitHub stars
1contributors
501commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
20open issues
Maven, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'quality_mkdocs' from its registry
  • Advisory severity resolved for 120 of 271 advisories (lookup cap); the remainder are reported as unknown severity

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

23456622023-072024-122026-05
Major 0Minor 1Patch 2

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 09:30 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities126 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 35
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_connect_api_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${revision}api/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_core_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${revision}api_stub/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:shim_runtime_${shimRuntime}_${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${shimRuntimeVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_api_stub_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${revision}connect_api/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_core_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${revision}connect_api/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-rng-simple${rngVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-dataset${framelessCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-core${framelessCoreCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-ml${framelessCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-cats${framelessCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Mavencom.chuusai:shapeless_${scalaCompatVersion}${shapelessVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Mavenorg.scala-lang.modules:scala-collection-compat_${scalaCompatVersion}${scalaCollectionCompatVersion}connect_api/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:shim_runtime_${shimRuntime}_${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${shimRuntimeVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:testing-runtime_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${testingVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_server_shared_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${revision}server/pom.xml
Mavennet.openhft:zero-allocation-hashing${zeroAllocHashingVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-rng-client-api${rngVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-rng-core${rngVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-rng-simple${rngVersion}server/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-dataset${framelessCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}server/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-core${framelessCoreCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}server/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-ml${framelessCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}server/pom.xml
Maven${framelessOrg}:frameless-cats${framelessCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${framelessVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavenorg.scala-lang.modules:scala-parser-combinators_${scalaCompatVersion}${parserCombinatorVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavencom.chuusai:shapeless_${scalaCompatVersion}${shapelessVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavenorg.yaml:snakeyaml${snakeVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavenorg.scala-lang.modules:scala-collection-compat_${scalaCompatVersion}${scalaCollectionCompatVersion}server/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_api_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${revision}shared_server/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_${qualityArtifact}${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${project.version}testShades/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${project.version}testShades/pom.xml
Mavenorg.scalatest:scalatest_${scalaCompatVersion}${scalatestVersion}testShades/pom.xml
Mavencom.sparkutils:testing_${dbrCompatVersion}${sparkCompatVersion}_${scalaCompatVersion}${testingVersion}testShades/pom.xml
Mavencom.storm-enroute:scalameter_${scalaCompatVersion}${scalaMeterVersion}testShades/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.groovy:groovy-jsr2234.0.26testShades/pom.xml
Mavencom.eed3si9n.jarjarabrams:jarjar-abrams-core_${scalaCompatVersion}${jarjarVersion}testShades/pom.xml
All dependencies 114

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 108 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavennet.openhft:zero-allocation-hashingdirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-rng-client-apidirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-rng-coredirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-rng-simpledirect
Mavenorg.apache.groovy:groovy-jsr2234.0.26direct
Mavenorg.yaml:snakeyamldirect
Mavencom.chuusai:shapeless_2.11indirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.9.9indirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-scala_2.112.9.9indirect
Mavencom.globalmentor:hadoop-bare-naked-local-fsindirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava15.0indirect
Mavencom.sparkutils:quality_2.4_2.110.1.3.1indirect
Mavencom.sparkutils:shim_compilation_2.4.0.oss_2.4_2.11indirect
Mavencom.sparkutils:shim_runtime_2.4.0.oss_2.4_2.11indirect
Mavencom.storm-enroute:scalameter_2.11indirect
Mavencom.storm-enroute:scalameter_2.110.19indirect
Maveneu.timepit:refined_2.110.9.12indirect
Mavenjunit:junitindirect
Mavennet.alchim31.maven:scala-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin2.9.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scripting-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin2.2.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-report-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.spark:spark-avro_2.112.4.6indirect
Mavenorg.apache.spark:spark-hive_2.112.4.6indirect
Mavenorg.apache.spark:spark-sql_2.112.4.6indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin3.2.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:flatten-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.scala-lang.modules:scala-collection-compat_2.11indirect
Mavenorg.scala-lang.modules:scala-parser-combinators_2.111.1.2indirect
Mavenorg.scala-lang:scala-compiler2.11.12indirect
Mavenorg.scala-lang:scala-library2.11.12indirect
Mavenorg.scalatest:scalatest_2.11indirect
Mavenorg.scoverage:scoverage-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.7.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.9.1indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.9.3indirect
PyPIbrotli1.0.9indirect
PyPIbrotlipy0.7.0indirect
PyPIcairocffi1.2.0indirect
PyPIcairosvg2.5.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2020.6.20indirect
PyPIcffi1.14.3indirect
PyPIchardet3.0.4indirect
PyPIclick8.0.1indirect
PyPIcryptography3.2.1indirect
PyPIcssselect20.4.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIfonttools4.37.1indirect
PyPIghp-import2.0.1indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.7indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.20indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIhttplib20.19.1indirect
PyPIidna2.10indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata4.6.3indirect
PyPIjinja23.0.1indirect
PyPIlxml4.9.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.3.4indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.0.1indirect
PyPImdx-gh-links0.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImike1.1.2indirect
PyPImkdocs1.4.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin0.9.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-macros-plugin0.7.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.1.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-redirects1.0.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-with-pdf0.9.3indirect
PyPIpackaging21.0indirect
PyPIpillow8.3.1indirect
PyPIpip20.2.4indirect
PyPIplantuml0.3.0indirect
PyPIplantuml-markdown3.4.2indirect
PyPIpycosat0.6.3indirect
PyPIpycparser2.20indirect
PyPIpydyf0.2.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.14indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions9.9.1indirect
PyPIpyopenssl19.1.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing2.4.7indirect
PyPIpyphen0.11.0indirect
PyPIpysocks1.7.1indirect
PyPIpytest-runner5.3.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.8.2indirect
PyPIpytz2021.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag0.1indirect
PyPIrequests2.26indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.17.16indirect
PyPIsix1.15.0indirect
PyPIsmmap4.0.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.2.1indirect
PyPItermcolor1.1.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.1.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.51.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions3.10.0.0indirect
PyPIurllib31.25.11indirect
PyPIverspec0.1.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog2.1.3indirect
PyPIweasyprint56.1indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwheel0.35.1indirect
PyPIzipp3.5.0indirect
PyPIzopfli0.2.1indirect
Dependency advisories 27

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 89 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 27 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
cairosvg2.5.2indirectcritical42.9.0
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.9.9indirectcritical543.1.4
cryptography3.2.1indirectcritical22300.0.12
gitpython3.1.20indirectcritical403.1.58
brotli1.0.9indirecthigh22.13.4
certifi2020.6.20indirecthigh52024.7.4
click8.0.1indirecthigh18.3.3
fonttools4.37.1indirecthigh44.60.2
pillow8.3.1indirecthigh5027.0.0-beta.2
com.google.guava:guava15.0indirectmoderate332.0.0-android
mkdocs-material9.1.2indirectmoderate19.7.7
httplib20.19.1indirectunknown2
idna2.10indirectunknown4
jinja23.0.1indirectunknown10
lxml4.9.1indirectunknown2
markdown3.3.4indirectunknown2
pip20.2.4indirectunknown16
pygments2.14indirectunknown4
pymdown-extensions9.9.1indirectunknown8
pyopenssl19.1.0indirectunknown2
requests2.26indirectunknown8
soupsieve2.2.1indirectunknown4
tqdm4.51.0indirectunknown2
urllib31.25.11indirectunknown18
weasyprint56.1indirectunknown4
wheel0.35.1indirectunknown2
zipp3.5.0indirectunknown2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.