Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 17:43 UTC

spf13 / viper

Go configuration with fangs

GoMIT★ 30,456 stars⑂ 2,273 forkssince Apr 2014View on GitHub ↗

spf13/viper holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (76/100) and lowest on Vitality (35/100). It was last updated 246 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Steve FranciaPersonal account
16,649 followers117 public repossince Dec 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0-44373 days ago
Gogithub.com/spf13/viper/remotev1.21.0-9373 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

35Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 246 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume15 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share0.64
days_since_last_push246
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases35 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 373 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~71.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tagv1.21.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release373
mean_days_between_releases71.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars30,456 stars
25/25Forks2,273 forks
13.6/15Watchers276 watchers
Inputs used
forks2,273
stars30,456
watchers276
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgoreportcard.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 51% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 54 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.511
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
17.4/30PR acceptance520/894 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs520
open_issues8
closed_issues929
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.991
closed_unmerged_prs374
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach16,649 followers of spf13
25/25Track record117 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers16,649
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginspf13
public_repos117
account_age_days6,105
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on go
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 373 days ago
20/20Version history44 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/spf13/viper, github.com/spf13/viper/remote
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish373

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yaml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 54 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
4/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities40 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories63
affected_packages9
assessed_packages85
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1, moderate 1, unknown 5
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 85 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history56 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.875
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yaml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentNix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance36 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, remote/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.36
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
51.7/55Manageable file sizes2/33 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes66,591
source_files_sampled33
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

30,456GitHub stars
99contributors
15commits, last 12 months
246days since last push
35releases
1bus factor
8open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,273 ⇿
0Stars
2,273Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

1,2001,4001,6001,8002,0002,2002,4002,273502021-072024-022026-09
Major 0Minor 13Patch 4

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 17:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
4Code-ReviewFound 4/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 54 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities40 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.2.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0go.mod
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/cryptv0.31.0remote/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0remote/go.mod
All dependencies 85

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 73 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v22.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v22.2.4direct
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/crypt0.31.0direct
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locafero0.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locafero0.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/afero1.15.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cast1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.10direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenv1.6.0direct
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v33.0.4direct
Gocloud.google.com/go0.120.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth0.16.5indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adapt0.2.8indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata0.8.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/firestore1.18.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/longrunning0.6.7indirect
Gogithub.com/armon/go-metrics0.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-semver0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-systemd/v2222.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/color1.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoop1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdr1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-go0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxy0.3.6indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v22.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v22.26.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/consul/api1.32.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrap1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclog1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-immutable-radix1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierror1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-rootcerts1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru0.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/serf0.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compress1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorable0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedir1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats.go1.45.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nkeys0.4.11indirect
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nuid1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/conc0.3.1-0.20240121214520-5f936abd7ae8indirect
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v33.6.4indirect
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v33.6.4indirect
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v22.305.22indirect
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v33.6.4indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk1.1.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc0.61.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp0.61.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel1.37.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric1.37.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace1.37.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierr1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zap1.27.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp0.0.0-20250305212735-054e65f0b394indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.30.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.16.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.28.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.12.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/api0.248.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto0.0.0-20250603155806-513f23925822indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api0.0.0-20250707201910-8d1bb00bc6a7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20250818200422-3122310a409cindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.75.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.36.7indirect
Gogopkg.in/check.v11.0.0-20190902080502-41f04d3bba15indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 85 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.41.0indirectcritical350.56.0
google.golang.org/grpc1.75.0indirectcritical101.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
go.opentelemetry.io/otel1.37.0indirecthigh21.41.0
golang.org/x/net0.43.0indirectmoderate111.27.0-rc.3
github.com/klauspost/compress1.18.0indirectunknown11.18.7
go.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v33.6.4indirectunknown13.7.1
golang.org/x/sys0.29.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/sys0.35.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.28.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.