Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 08:38 UTC

spotDL / spotify-downloader

Download your Spotify playlists and songs along with album art and metadata (from YouTube if a match is found).

PythonMIT★ 25,665 stars⑂ 2,202 forkssince Jul 2016View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

#mp3 #spotify #download-music #music #song-lyrics #song #youtube-music #playlists #spotdl #spotdl-cli #hacktoberfest #python

spotDL/spotify-downloader holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (95/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

spotDLOrganization

380 followers5 public repossince Sep 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	spotdl	4.5.2	-	106	15 days ago	downloader music spotdl spotify

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 2 days ago
21.5/36	Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 446 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	446
human_commit_share	0.95
days_since_last_push	2
active_weeks_last_year	31

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 99 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~39.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	99
latest_release_tag	v4.5.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	15
mean_days_between_releases	39.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

95Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

98Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 25,665 stars
25/25	Forks — 2,202 forks
13/15	Watchers — 216 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2,202
stars	25,665
watchers	216
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

63Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.381

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good

How it's scored

40.7/42	Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
22/30	PR acceptance — 608/828 decided PRs merged
3.9/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/10 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	608
open_issues	59
closed_issues	1,802
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	3
prs_merged_30d	15
prs_decided_30d	24
issue_closed_ratio	0.968
closed_unmerged_prs	220
first_time_authors_30d	8
first_time_prs_merged_30d	3
first_time_prs_decided_30d	10

Ownership & stewardship

82Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
18.6/25	Owner reach — 380 followers of spotDL
17.4/25	Track record — 5 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	380
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	spotDL
public_repos	5
account_age_days	2,138

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20	Version history — 106 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	spotdl
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .pylintrc
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://spotdl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	mp3, spotify, download-music, music, song-lyrics, song, youtube-music, playlists, spotdl, spotdl-cli, hacktoberfest, python
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://spotdl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
docs_site	https://spotdl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	4.7

Dependency advisories

53Moderate

How it's scored

14/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: fastapi 0.103.2 (high 7.5)
10/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: starlette 0.27.0 (high 7.5)
29.1/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 911 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	15
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	58
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Matched the pypi:spotdl@4.5.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 58 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

22At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
22.5/40	Legible commit history — 40 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.421
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .pylintrc
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.05

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.4/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/96 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	260,638
source_files_sampled	96
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

25,665GitHub stars

99contributors

446commits, last 12 months

2days since last push

99releases

2bus factor

59open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 13 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,202 ⇿

0Stars

2,202Forks

20Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 17

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10

4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 08:38 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 3/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10	Contributors	project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	24 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 21

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	spotipy	`>=2.26.0,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	spotipyFree	`>=1.9.13,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ytmusicapi	`>=1.12.1,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	yt-dlp	`>=2026.07.04,<2027`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mutagen	`>=1.47.0,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rich	`>=13.9.4,<14`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`>=4.12.3,<5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.32.3,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rapidfuzz	`>=3.10.1,<4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-slugify	`>=8.0.4,<9`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`>=0.23.2,<0.24`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.9.2,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	fastapi	`>=0.103.0,<0.104`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	platformdirs	`>=4.3.6,<5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pykakasi	`>=2.3.0,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	syncedlyrics	`>=1.0.1,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	soundcloud-v2	`>=1.6.0,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	websockets	`~=14.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	datastar-py	`>=0.6.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jinja2	`>=3.1.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-multipart	`>=0.0.20`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 129 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.14.3`	direct
PyPI	datastar-py	`1.0.0`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.103.2`	direct
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	direct
PyPI	mutagen	`1.47.0`	direct
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.6`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	direct
PyPI	pykakasi	`2.3.0`	direct
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.31`	direct
PyPI	python-slugify	`8.0.4`	direct
PyPI	rapidfuzz	`3.14.5`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.0`	direct
PyPI	rich	`13.9.4`	direct
PyPI	soundcloud-v2	`1.7.0`	direct
PyPI	spotipy	`2.26.0`	direct
PyPI	spotipyfree	`1.9.13`	direct
PyPI	syncedlyrics	`1.0.1`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.23.2`	direct
PyPI	websockets	`14.2`	direct
PyPI	yt-dlp	`2026.7.4`	direct
PyPI	ytmusicapi	`1.12.1`	direct
PyPI	altgraph	`0.17.5`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`3.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`3.3.11`	indirect
PyPI	async-timeout	`5.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`7.0`	indirect
PyPI	black	`26.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	brotli	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	brotlicffi	`1.2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.4.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	curl-cffi	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	dacite	`1.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	deprecated	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.3.9`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffe	`2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	griffecli	`2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`5.13.2`	indirect
PyPI	jaconv	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	linkify-it-py	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	macholib	`1.16.4`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat	`0.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat-gfm	`0.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat-tables	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-autorefs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-gen-files	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-gen-files	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-literate-nav	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-literate-nav	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`9.7.6`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material-extensions	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-section-index	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-section-index	`0.3.12`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`0.26.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`1.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`1.20.2`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	paginate	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pefile	`2024.8.26`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	properdocs	`1.6.7`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycryptodomex	`3.23.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyfakefs	`5.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller	`6.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller-hooks-contrib	`2026.5`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`3.3.9`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`10.21.3`	indirect
PyPI	pymongo	`4.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyotp	`2.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`0.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`6.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-recording	`0.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-subprocess	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	readerwriterlock	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	redis	`7.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect
PyPI	spotapi	`1.2.8`	indirect
PyPI	spotdl	`4.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`0.27.0`	indirect
PyPI	text-unidecode	`1.3`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	types-deprecated	`1.3.1.20260508`	indirect
PyPI	types-orjson	`3.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	types-python-dateutil	`2.9.0.20260508`	indirect
PyPI	types-python-slugify	`8.0.2.20240310`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260510`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.31.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	types-setuptools	`75.8.2.20250305`	indirect
PyPI	types-toml	`0.10.8.20260508`	indirect
PyPI	types-ujson	`5.10.0.20250822`	indirect
PyPI	types-urllib3	`1.26.25.14`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	uc-micro-py	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	unidecode	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	validators	`0.35.0`	indirect
PyPI	vcrpy	`6.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.23.0`	indirect
PyPI	yt-dlp-ejs	`0.8.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

Installing pypi:spotdl@4.5.2 pulls in 58 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
fastapi	`0.103.2`	direct	high	1	`0.109.1`
starlette	`0.27.0`	indirect	high	14	`1.3.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records