Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 01:08 UTC

stepanenko3 / nova-command-runner

This Laravel Nova tool lets you run artisan and bash commands directly from Nova 4 or higher.

PHP · VueMIT★ 36 stars⑂ 23 forkssince Apr 2022View on GitHub ↗

stepanenko3/nova-command-runner holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (54/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (23/100). It was last updated 195 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Artem StepanenkoPersonal account

35 followers50 public repossince Aug 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	stepanenko3/nova-command-runner	v4.5.1	19,270	31	195 days ago	shell commands nova laravel bash artisan

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

32At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

7Critical

How it's scored

3.6/36	Push recency — last push 195 days ago
0.7/36	Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18	Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1
human_commit_share	0.701
days_since_last_push	195
active_weeks_last_year	1

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 30 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 195 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~79.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	30
latest_release_tag	v4.5.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	195
mean_days_between_releases	79.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak

How it's scored

25/60	Stars — 36 stars
11.2/25	Forks — 23 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	23
stars	36
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate

How it's scored

57.1/80	Monthly downloads — 19,270 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	stepanenko3/nova-command-runner
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	1,093,347
monthly_downloads	19,270
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	11
top_contributor_share	0.773

Issue & PR responsiveness

53Moderate

How it's scored

23.1/42	Issue resolution — 55% of issues closed
7.6/30	PR acceptance — 47/186 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	47
open_issues	9
closed_issues	11
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.55
closed_unmerged_prs	139
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.2/25	Owner reach — 35 followers of stepanenko3
24.4/25	Track record — 50 public repos, account ~9 yr old

Inputs used

followers	35
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	stepanenko3
public_repos	50
account_age_days	3,316

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 195 days ago
20/20	Version history — 31 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	stepanenko3/nova-command-runner
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	195

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

38Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 50 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	3.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	50
affected_packages	8
assessed_packages	147
unassessed_packages	5
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 5, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 147 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

23At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

15Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.9/40	Legible commit history — 19 of 68 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.279
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

18Critical

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 97
8/8	Automated maintenance — 29 of the last 97 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.299

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/16 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	6,725
source_files_sampled	16
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

36GitHub stars

11contributors

1commits, last 12 months

195days since last push

30releases

1bus factor

9open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 23 ⇿

0Stars

23Forks

28Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 5Patch 23

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10

3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 01:07 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	50 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	laravel/nova	`^5.0 \|\| ^4.0`	composer.json
Packagist	stepanenko3/laravel-helpers	`^1.3.2`	composer.json
npm	autoprefixer	`^10.4.20`	package.json
npm	tailwindcss	`^4.0.14`	package.json

All dependencies 152

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 148 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	autoprefixer	`10.4.20`	direct
npm	tailwindcss	`4.2.1`	direct
Packagist	laravel/nova	`—`	direct
Packagist	stepanenko3/laravel-helpers	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.25.9`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.25.9`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.26.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.26.3`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	@inertiajs/inertia	`0.11.1`	indirect
npm	@inertiajs/inertia-vue3	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loongarch64-gnu	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/node	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm64	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm64	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x64	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x64	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.13`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.13`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.5.13`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.5.13`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.13`	indirect
npm	axios	`0.21.4`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.24.3`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001689`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	define-data-property	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.73`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.20.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.25.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.15.6`	indirect
npm	fraction.js	`4.3.7`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-property-descriptors	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	has-proto	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.6.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.31.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.clonedeep	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.isequal	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.8`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.19`	indirect
npm	normalize-range	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.3`	indirect
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.12.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.34.4`	indirect
npm	set-function-length	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.4.27`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`—`	indirect
Packagist	tightenco/duster	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 147 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`4.34.4`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
axios	`0.21.4`	indirect	high	23	`1.18.0`
browserslist	`4.24.3`	indirect	high	2	`4.28.7`
nanoid	`3.3.8`	indirect	high	3	`5.1.16`
postcss	`8.5.3`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
vite	`6.2.1`	indirect	high	12	`8.0.16`
follow-redirects	`1.15.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.16.0`
qs	`6.12.1`	indirect	moderate	4	`6.16.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records