Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 01:18 UTC

stolostron / gatekeeper

🐊 Gatekeeper - Policy Controller for Kubernetes

Makefile · ShellApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Nov 2020forkView on GitHub ↗

stolostron/gatekeeper holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (69/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (16/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

41
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

41
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StolostronOrganization
210 followers365 public repossince Jan 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
11.7/18Commit volume19 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year19
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~26.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.24.0-beta.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases26.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

16Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
7.5/25Forks9 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
13.2/30PR acceptance352/799 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs352
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs447
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
16.7/25Owner reach210 followers of stolostron
25/25Track record365 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers210
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginstolostron
public_repos365
account_age_days2,365
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

17Critical · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/
docs_sitehttps://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,400
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeMakefile without a type-check config
0/55Manageable file sizesno source files detected
Inputs used
primary_languageMakefile
largest_source_bytes
source_files_sampled0
oversized_source_files0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Manageable file sizes. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
19commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 01:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 138

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute1.6.1indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/monitoring1.5.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/trace1.2.0indirect
Gocontrib.go.opencensus.io/exporter/ocagent0.7.0indirect
Gocontrib.go.opencensus.io/exporter/prometheus0.4.2indirect
Gocontrib.go.opencensus.io/exporter/stackdriver0.13.14indirect
Gogithub.com/agnivade/levenshtein1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/antlr/antlr4/runtime/go/antlr0.0.0-20210826220005-b48c857c3a0eindirect
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/govalidator0.0.0-20210307081110-f21760c49a8dindirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.44.23indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ansiterm0.0.0-20210617225240-d185dfc1b5a1indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/blang/semver/v44.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/census-instrumentation/opencensus-proto0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/containerd1.6.12indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/cli20.10.21+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/distribution2.8.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/docker20.10.21+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/docker-credential-helpers0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connections0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-metrics0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-units0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful2.16.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch5.6.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoop1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yaml1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-kit/log0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logfmt/logfmt0.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/zapr1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.19.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.21.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/glob0.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/glog1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcache0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daindirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/cel-go0.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v22.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/mux1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway1.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergo0.3.13indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespath0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compress1.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/locker1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/term0.0.0-20221205130635-1aeaba878587indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/morikuni/aec1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/nxadm/tail1.4.8indirect
Gogithub.com/oneofone/xxhash1.2.8indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo1.16.5indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomega1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/cert-controller0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/frameworks/constraint0.0.0-20221214024800-b745745c4118indirect
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opa0.47.2indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digest1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-spec1.1.0-rc2indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.14.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/prometheus0.35.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/statsd_exporter0.22.7indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metrics0.0.0-20201227073835-cf1acfcdf475indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/stoewer/go-strcase1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tchap/go-patricia/v22.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointer0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreference0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Gogithub.com/yashtewari/glob-intersection0.1.0indirect
Gogo.opencensus.io0.23.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib0.20.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp0.32.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel1.7.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp0.20.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric0.30.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk1.7.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/export/metric0.20.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metric0.20.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace1.7.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlp0.16.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomic1.9.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/automaxprocs1.5.1indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierr1.8.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zap1.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.4.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20220622183110-fd043fe589d2indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.1.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.3.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.3.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.5.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.0.0-20220609170525-579cf78fd858indirect
Gogomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v22.2.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/api0.81.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto0.0.0-20220527130721-00d5c0f3be58indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.51.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.28.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/tomb.v11.0.0-20141024135613-dd632973f1e7indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/api0.24.9indirect
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver0.24.7indirect
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.24.9indirect
Gok8s.io/apiserver0.24.7indirect
Gok8s.io/client-go0.24.9indirect
Gok8s.io/component-base0.24.7indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.70.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20220413171646-5e7f5fdc6da6indirect
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20220210201930-3a6ce19ff2f9indirect
Gooras.land/oras-go1.2.2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client0.0.33indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime0.12.3indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20220525155127-227cbc7cc124indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.2.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.3.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.