Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 20:35 UTC

stuinfla / ruvnet-brain

RuvNet Brain — a downloadable, source-grounded brain for Claude Code over Reuven Cohen's (rUv's) RuvNet stack: RuVector/RVF, Ruflo, AgentDB, RuLake, SPARC + 21 building blocks. Grounds Claude in real source via one MCP tool (search_ruvnet), so it builds with the stack instead of drifting off it.

JavaScript · HTMLCustom license★ 17 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#agentdb#ai-agents#anthropic-claude#claude-code#claude-code-plugin#knowledge-base#llm-tools#mcp#model-context-protocol#rag#reuven-cohen#ruflo#ruvector#ruvnet#source-grounded#sparc#vector-search#rulake

stuinfla/ruvnet-brain holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

stuart kerrPersonal account
20 followers52 public repossince Jul 2021ISO Vision, LLC

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmruvnet-brain2.9.12,264152 days agoruvnetruvrufloruvectorrvfagentdbgroundingbrainmcpclaude-codeinstaller

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

56Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 252 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year252
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagv3.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

25At Risk
How it's scored
19.5/60Stars — 17 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars17
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

79Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.7/80Monthly downloads — 2,264 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesruvnet-brain
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,264
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.96

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
20/30PR acceptance — 4/6 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs4
open_issues1
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.923
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of stuinfla
22.6/25Track record — 52 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginstuinfla
public_repos52
account_age_days1,839
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesruvnet-brain
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://isovision.ai/ruvnet-brain/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagentdb, ai-agents, anthropic-claude, claude-code, claude-code-plugin, knowledge-base, llm-tools, mcp, model-context-protocol, rag, reuven-cohen, ruflo, ruvector, ruvnet, source-grounded, sparc, vector-search, rulake
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://isovision.ai/ruvnet-brain/
docs_sitehttps://isovision.ai/ruvnet-brain/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 2/164 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes120,621
source_files_sampled164
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

17GitHub stars
4contributors
252commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 20:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@ruvector/rvf0.2.3kb/package.json
npm@xenova/transformers2.17.2kb/package.json
npm@metaharness/flywheel^0.1.7package.json
npm@metaharness/router^0.3.2package.json
All dependencies 173

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 169 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@metaharness/flywheel0.1.7direct
npm@metaharness/router0.3.2direct
npm@ruvector/rvf0.2.3direct
npm@xenova/transformers2.17.2direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@huggingface/jinja0.2.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@metaharness/darwin0.8.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.138.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-node0.1.8indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-node-darwin-arm640.1.7indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-node-darwin-x640.1.7indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-node-linux-arm64-gnu0.1.7indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-node-linux-x64-gnu0.1.7indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-node-win32-x64-msvc0.1.7indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-solver0.1.8indirect
npm@ruvector/rvf-wasm0.1.7indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.4indirect
npmb4a1.8.1indirect
npmbare-events2.9.1indirect
npmbare-fs4.7.3indirect
npmbare-os3.9.3indirect
npmbare-path3.0.1indirect
npmbare-stream2.13.3indirect
npmbare-url2.4.5indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbl4.1.0indirect
npmbuffer5.7.1indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmchownr1.1.4indirect
npmcolor4.2.3indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolor-string1.9.1indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdecompress-response6.0.0indirect
npmdeep-extend0.6.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.5indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmevents-universal1.0.1indirect
npmexpand-template2.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfast-fifo1.3.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmflatbuffers1.12.0indirect
npmfs-constants1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgithub-from-package0.0.0indirect
npmguid-typescript1.0.9indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmini1.3.8indirect
npmis-arrayish0.3.4indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlong4.0.0indirect
npmlong5.3.2indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.3indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmimic-response3.1.0indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmmkdirp-classic0.5.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmnapi-build-utils2.0.0indirect
npmnode-abi3.94.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api6.1.0indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmonnx-proto4.0.4indirect
npmonnxruntime-common1.14.0indirect
npmonnxruntime-node1.14.0indirect
npmonnxruntime-web1.14.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplatform1.3.6indirect
npmpostcss8.5.16indirect
npmprebuild-install7.1.3indirect
npmprotobufjs8.7.0indirect
npmpump3.0.4indirect
npmrc1.2.8indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmrolldown1.1.4indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsharp0.32.6indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsimple-concat1.0.1indirect
npmsimple-get4.0.1indirect
npmsimple-swizzle0.2.4indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmstreamx2.28.0indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments2.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtar-fs2.1.5indirect
npmtar-fs3.1.3indirect
npmtar-stream2.2.0indirect
npmtar-stream3.2.0indirect
npmteex1.0.1indirect
npmtext-decoder1.2.7indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtunnel-agent0.6.0indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvite8.1.3indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with stuinfla/ruvnet-brain. Read them side by side →

95Tencent/WeKnoraOpen-source LLM knowledge platform: turn raw documents into a queryable RAG, an autonomous reasoning agent, and a self-maintaining Wiki.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional94smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-goSupercharge AI Agents, SafelyExceptional95trpc-group/trpc-agent-goA Go framework for building production agent systems with graph workflows, tools, memory, A2A, AG-UI, MCP, evaluation, and observability.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional96microsoft/agent-governance-toolkitAI Agent Governance Toolkit — Policy enforcement, zero-trust identity, execution sandboxing, and reliability engineering for autonomous AI agents. Covers 10/10 OWASP Agentic Top 10.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.