Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 06:41 UTC
superbasedapp / observer
Local-first control plane for AI coding agents — launch browser terminals, run and remotely control sessions, and track files, tokens & cost across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI and 20+ more. 100% local, no telemetry.
superbasedapp/observer holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (45/100). It was last updated 15 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
75
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
▞ superbasedOrganization
2 followers2 public repossince Jul 2026
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/marmutapp/superbased-observerpoints to another repo — not scored | v1.32.0 | - | 52 | 15 days ago | — |
| npm | @superbased/observer | 1.32.0 | 1,604 | 119 | 15 days ago | aiobservabilityanthropicopenaiclaude-codecodexcursormcptokenscostcost-trackingtoken-usageai-coding-agentllm-observabilityspend |
| PyPI | superbased-observer | 1.32.0 | - | 33 | 15 days ago | aiai-coding-agentanthropicclaude-codecodexcostcost-trackingcursorllm-observabilitymcpobservabilityopenaispendtoken-usagetokens |
| npm | @superbased/opencode-pluginpoints to another repo — not scored | 1.27.0 | 35 | 1 | 41 days ago | opencodeopencode-pluginmcpobservabilitycosttokens |
| npm | @superbased/observer-linux-x64 | 1.32.0 | 1,191 | 119 | 15 days ago | — |
| npm | @superbased/observer-win32-x64 | 1.32.0 | 1,198 | 119 | 15 days ago | — |
| npm | @superbased/observer-darwin-x64 | 1.32.0 | 1,143 | 119 | 15 days ago | — |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
72
Development activity
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 28.8/36 | Push recency — last push 15 days ago |
| 4.2/36 | Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits |
| 10.6/18 | Commit volume — 14 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 14 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 15 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 6 |
Release discipline
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 51 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 15 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~3.7 days |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 51 |
| latest_release_tag | v1.32.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 15 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 3.7 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
58
Popularity & adoption
32At Risk
How it's scored
| 26.5/60 | Stars — 44 stars |
| 5.8/25 | Forks — 6 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 1 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 6 |
| stars | 44 |
| watchers | 1 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
86Excellent
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 16.9/22.5 | License — license file present, not a recognized license |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 13.5/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 5 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | yes |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
62Moderate
How it's scored
| 49.5/80 | Monthly downloads — 5,136 downloads/month across npm, pypi |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | @superbased/observer, superbased-observer, @superbased/observer-linux-x64, @superbased/observer-win32-x64, @superbased/observer-darwin-x64 |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | npm, pypi |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 5,136 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
45
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
13Critical
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 0/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| 1.4/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 1 contributors |
| 3/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 1 |
| top_contributor_share | 1 |
How it's scored
| 42/42 | Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed |
| 0/30 | PR acceptance — 0/2 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 0 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 7 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 1 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 2 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
37Weak
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 3.4/25 | Owner reach — 2 followers of superbasedapp |
| 3.8/25 | Track record — 2 public repos, account ~0 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 2 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | superbasedapp |
| public_repos | 2 |
| account_age_days | 51 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on npm, pypi |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 119 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | @superbased/observer, superbased-observer, @superbased/observer-linux-x64, @superbased/observer-win32-x64, @superbased/observer-darwin-x64 |
| ecosystems | npm, pypi |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 15 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
84
Engineering practices
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 1 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://superbased.app |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 20 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | claude-code, cost-tracking, cursor, local-first, mcp-server, token-tracking, agent-governance, agent-management, agent-observability, agent-orchestration, ai-agent-control-plane, browser-terminal, codex-cli, coding-agents, gemini-cli, local-ai-agents, opencode, remote-agents, remote-terminal, self-hosted |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://superbased.app |
| docs_site | https://superbased.app |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
65
Security posture
56Moderate
How it's scored
| 6.8/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0.8/2.5 | Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 5/5 | Fuzzing — project is fuzzed |
| 2.2/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 2.5/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
| 7.5/7.5 | Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 75 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 16 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 2 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5.6 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 25/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 0 |
| affected_packages | 0 |
| assessed_packages | 5 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | none |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@superbased/observer@1.32.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 5 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
75
Agent context & guidance
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 15/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://superbased.app/llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | yes |
| llms_txt_url | https://superbased.app/llms.txt |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — plugins/opencode/tsconfig.json, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, vscode/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no data |
| 5/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | go.sum, package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | plugins/opencode/tsconfig.json, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, vscode/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | benchmarks/corpus/representative/example-go-build-fix/workspace/go.mod, benchmarks/corpus/representative/go-brackets-feature-add/workspace/go.mod, benchmarks/corpus/representative/go-pricing-refactor/workspace/go.mod, browser-extension/tools/cdp-capture/go.mod, go.mod, internal/compression/shell/filters/defaults/cargo.toml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
99Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed) |
| 53.9/55 | Manageable file sizes — 54/2,622 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Go |
| largest_source_bytes | 283,263 |
| source_files_sampled | 2,622 |
| oversized_source_files | 54 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 20/20 | MCP server |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples, recipes |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples, recipes |
| has_mcp_signal | yes |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
44GitHub stars
1contributors
14commits, last 12 months
15days since last push
51releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- go package 'github.com/marmutapp/superbased-observer' points at a different repository (https://github.com/marmutapp/superbased-observer); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Could not fetch npm package 'superbased-observer' from its registry
- Could not fetch pypi package 'superbased-observer-sdk' from its registry
- Could not fetch npm package '@superbased/observer-sdk' from its registry
- pypi download statistics for 'superbased-observer' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
- npm package '@superbased/opencode-plugin' points at a different repository (https://github.com/superbasedapp/plugins); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
47Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 22Patch 25
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 9 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 3 | Contributors | project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 10 | Fuzzing | project is fuzzed |
| 9 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 5 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 10 | Signed-Releases | 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
| 10 | Token-Permissions | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 75 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 60
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/BurntSushi/toml | v1.6.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/billgraziano/dpapi | v0.5.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/cilium/ebpf | v0.21.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/coder/websocket | v1.8.15 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/creack/pty | v1.1.24 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/crewjam/saml | v0.5.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/elimity-com/scim | v0.0.0-20260506142751-830e1caafcc3 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify | v1.9.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/google/uuid | v1.6.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/jackc/pgx/v5 | v5.9.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/klauspost/compress | v1.18.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/oapi-codegen/runtime | v1.4.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/open-telemetry/opamp-go | v0.23.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/scim2/filter-parser/v2 | v2.2.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/cobra | v1.10.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/pflag | v1.0.9 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tailscale/hujson | v0.0.0-20260302212456-ecc657c15afd | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tetratelabs/wazero | v1.12.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 | v2.10.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/zalando/go-keyring | v0.2.8 | go.mod |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel | v1.43.0 | go.mod |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttp | v1.43.0 | go.mod |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk | v1.43.0 | go.mod |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace | v1.43.0 | go.mod |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlp | v1.10.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/crypto | v0.53.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/net | v0.56.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/sync | v0.21.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/sys | v0.47.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/term | v0.45.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/text | v0.39.0 | go.mod |
| Go | google.golang.org/grpc | v1.82.1 | go.mod |
| Go | google.golang.org/protobuf | v1.36.11 | go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/yaml.v3 | v3.0.1 | go.mod |
| Go | modernc.org/sqlite | v1.48.2 | go.mod |
| npm | adm-zip | ^0.5.16 | vscode/package.json |
| npm | tar | ^7.4.3 | vscode/package.json |
| npm | @floating-ui/react | ^0.27.19 | web/package.json |
| npm | @fontsource/inter | ^5.1.0 | web/package.json |
| npm | @fontsource/jetbrains-mono | ^5.1.0 | web/package.json |
| npm | @tanstack/react-table | ^8.20.5 | web/package.json |
| npm | @types/react-grid-layout | ^1.3.6 | web/package.json |
| npm | @xterm/addon-fit | ^0.10.0 | web/package.json |
| npm | @xterm/xterm | ^5.5.0 | web/package.json |
| npm | clsx | ^2.1.1 | web/package.json |
| npm | framer-motion | ^11.13.1 | web/package.json |
| npm | lucide-react | ^0.469.0 | web/package.json |
| npm | qrcode | ^1.5.4 | web/package.json |
| npm | react | ^18.3.1 | web/package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^18.3.1 | web/package.json |
| npm | react-grid-layout | ^1.4.4 | web/package.json |
| npm | react-router-dom | ^6.28.0 | web/package.json |
| npm | recharts | ^2.13.3 | web/package.json |
| PyPI | opentelemetry-api | >=1.20 | sdk/python/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | opentelemetry-sdk | >=1.20 | sdk/python/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http | >=1.20 | sdk/python/pyproject.toml |
| npm | @opentelemetry/api | ^1.9.0 | sdk/typescript/package.json |
| npm | @opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http | ^0.52.0 | sdk/typescript/package.json |
| npm | @opentelemetry/resources | ^1.25.0 | sdk/typescript/package.json |
| npm | @opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node | ^1.25.0 | sdk/typescript/package.json |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Dependency advisories 0
Installing npm:@superbased/observer@1.32.0 pulls in 5 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm, PyPI.