Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 14:09 UTC

syncfusion / ej2-javascript-ui-controls

Syncfusion JavaScript UI controls library offer more than 50+ cross-browser, responsive, and lightweight HTML5 UI controls for building modern web applications.

Custom license★ 448 stars⑂ 160 forkssince May 2017View on GitHub ↗
#ui-components#ui-library#ui-controls#aspnet-mvc#aspnet-core#material-design#bootstrap#office-ui-fabric#accessibility#module-pattern#javascript-ui#data-grid#charts#scheduler#diagram-generator#javascript#word-processor#data-visualization#form-controls#pivot-grid

syncfusion/ej2-javascript-ui-controls holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (1/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The World's Best UI Component Suite for Building Powerful AppsOrganization
797 followers336 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume — 65 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year65
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv34.1.30
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases7.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

71Good
How it's scored
43/60Stars — 448 stars
18.3/25Forks — 160 forks
9.8/15Watchers — 60 watchers
Inputs used
forks160
stars448
watchers60
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

74Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 22% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.224

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
10/30PR acceptance — 20/60 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues16
closed_issues128
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.889
closed_unmerged_prs40
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

95Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20.9/25Owner reach — 797 followers of syncfusion
25/25Track record — 336 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers797
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginsyncfusion
public_repos336
account_age_days5,186
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.syncfusion.com/javascript-ui-controls
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsui-components, ui-library, ui-controls, aspnet-mvc, aspnet-core, material-design, bootstrap, office-ui-fabric, accessibility, module-pattern, javascript-ui, data-grid, charts, scheduler, diagram-generator, javascript, word-processor, data-visualization, form-controls, pivot-grid
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.syncfusion.com/javascript-ui-controls
docs_sitehttps://www.syncfusion.com/javascript-ui-controls
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

1Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

1Critical
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — no dependency manifests — not applicable
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifests—
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

46Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — controls/barcodegenerator/tsconfig.json, controls/base/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configscontrols/barcodegenerator/tsconfig.json, controls/base/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — primary language unknown
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 51/2,511 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_language—
largest_source_bytes1,893,571
source_files_sampled2,511
oversized_source_files51
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Type-checkable code. Remaining weights renormalized.

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, recipes
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

448GitHub stars
21contributors
65commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
16open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Language breakdown unavailable
  • File tree truncated by GitHub API; file-based signals may be incomplete
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

All dependencies 108

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 108 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@syncfusion/ej2-barcode-generator*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-base*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-blockeditor*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-buttons*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-calendars*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-charts*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-circulargauge*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-compression*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-data*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-diagrams*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-documenteditor*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-drawings*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-dropdowns*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-excel-export*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-file-utils*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-filemanager*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-gantt*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-grid-chart*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-grids*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-heatmap*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-icons*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-image-editor*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-inplace-editor*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-inputs*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-interactive-chat*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-kanban*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-layouts*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-lineargauge*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-lists*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-maps*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-markdown-converter*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-multicolumn-combobox*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-navigations*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-notifications*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-office-chart*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-pdf*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-pdf-data-extract*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-pdf-export*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-pdfviewer*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-pivotview*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-popups*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-progressbar*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-querybuilder*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-ribbon*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-richtexteditor*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-schedule*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-splitbuttons*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-spreadsheet*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-staging^1.0.14indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-staging^1.0.2indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-staging^1.0.3indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-staging^1.0.4indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-svg-base*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-treegrid*indirect
npm@syncfusion/ej2-treemap*indirect
npm@types/chai3.4.28indirect
npm@types/chai^3.4.28indirect
npm@types/es6-promise0.0.28indirect
npm@types/jasmine2.5.43indirect
npm@types/jasmine2.8.22indirect
npm@types/jasmine2.8.9indirect
npm@types/jasmine-ajax3.1.27indirect
npm@types/jasmine-ajax^3.1.27indirect
npm@types/lodash4.14.159indirect
npm@types/node10.14.0indirect
npm@types/node18.11.11indirect
npm@types/requirejs2.1.26indirect
npm@types/requirejs^2.1.26indirect
npm@types/requirejs^2.1.37indirect
npmcanteen^1.0.5indirect
npmes6-promise^3.2.1indirect
npmgulp^3.9.1indirect
npmgulp-print^5.0.2indirect
npmgulp-prompt1.2.0indirect
npmgulp-replace^1.1.4indirect
npmgulp-sass^3.1.0indirect
npmgulp-stylelint^13.0.0indirect
npmgulp-typescript^3.1.6indirect
npmgulp-util^3.0.8indirect
npmjasmine-ajax^3.3.1indirect
npmjasmine-core^2.6.1indirect
npmjenkins-api0.3.1indirect
npmkarma6.4.2indirect
npmkarma-chrome-launcher^2.2.0indirect
npmkarma-generic-preprocessor^1.1.0indirect
npmkarma-htmlfile-reporter^0.3.5indirect
npmkarma-jasmine^1.1.0indirect
npmkarma-jasmine-ajax^0.1.13indirect
npmkarma-requirejs^1.1.0indirect
npmmarkdown-spellcheck^1.3.1indirect
npmnedb^1.8.0indirect
npmpostcss^8.4.14indirect
npmreadline-sync^1.4.10indirect
npmrequirejs^2.3.3indirect
npmrollup1.32.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-commonjs10.1.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-node-resolve5.2.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-sourcemaps0.6.3indirect
npmrollup-plugin-typescript1.0.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-uglify6.0.4indirect
npmsass1.51.0indirect
npmserve12.0.1indirect
npmsimple-odata-server^0.3.1indirect
npmstylelint^13.13.1indirect
npmstylelint-scss^3.18.0indirect
npmtable^6.8.0indirect
npmtslib^1.8.0indirect
npmtypescript2.3.4indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with syncfusion/ej2-javascript-ui-controls. Read them side by side →

98DevExpress/DevExtremeHTML5 JavaScript Component Suite for Responsive Web DevelopmentExceptional96vuetifyjs/vuetify🐉 Vue Component FrameworkExceptional100ionic-team/ionic-frameworkA powerful cross-platform UI toolkit for building native-quality iOS, Android, and Progressive Web Apps with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.Exceptional99mui/mui-xMUI X: Build complex and data-rich applications using a growing list of advanced React components, like the Data Grid, Date and Time Pickers, Charts, and more!Exceptional98apache/echartsApache ECharts is a powerful, interactive charting and data visualization library for browserExceptional98adobe/react-spectrumA collection of libraries and tools that help you build adaptive, accessible, and robust user experiences.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.