Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-09 16:44 UTC

tales-from-a-dev / flowbite-bundle

🎨 A Symfony form theme for Flowbite

PHP · TwigMIT★ 90 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Mar 2023View on GitHub ↗

#flowbite #form #symfony #symfony-bundle #theme

tales-from-a-dev/flowbite-bundle holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (77/100) and lowest on Security (35/100). It was last updated 249 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Tales from a DevOrganization

5 followers5 public repossince Oct 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	tales-from-a-dev/flowbite-bundle	v1.0.1	12,139	23	249 days ago	symfony theme form bundle flowbite

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

38Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

16Critical

How it's scored

3.6/36	Push recency — last push 249 days ago
2.1/36	Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
10/18	Commit volume — 12 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	12
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	249
active_weeks_last_year	3

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 23 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 249 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~67.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	23
latest_release_tag	v1.0.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	249
mean_days_between_releases	67.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

39Weak

How it's scored

31.6/60	Stars — 90 stars
7/25	Forks — 8 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	8
stars	90
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate

How it's scored

54.5/80	Monthly downloads — 12,139 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20	Registry dependents — 2 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	tales-from-a-dev/flowbite-bundle
dependents	2
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	314,391
monthly_downloads	12,139

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.961

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good

How it's scored

32.3/42	Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
29.2/30	PR acceptance — 37/38 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	37
open_issues	3
closed_issues	10
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.769
closed_unmerged_prs	1
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
5.6/25	Owner reach — 5 followers of tales-from-a-dev
13.2/25	Track record — 5 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	5
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	tales-from-a-dev
public_repos	5
account_age_days	1,380

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 249 days ago
20/20	Version history — 23 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	tales-from-a-dev/flowbite-bundle
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	249

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

78Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
8/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	flowbite, form, symfony, symfony-bundle, theme
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

35Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1/2.5	CI-Tests — 6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	3.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, dangerous_workflow, packaging, pinned_dependencies, signed_releases, token_permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40	Legible commit history — 34 of 77 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.442
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

37Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11	Static type checking
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 77
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/26 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	10,367
source_files_sampled	26
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

90GitHub stars

3contributors

12commits, last 12 months

249days since last push

23releases

1bus factor

3open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿

0Stars

8Forks

9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 3Patch 5

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10

3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-09 16:44 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
4	CI-Tests	6 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/twig-bridge	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.0 \|\| ^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	tales-from-a-dev/twig-tailwind-extra	`^1.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 10

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/twig-bridge	`—`	direct
Packagist	tales-from-a-dev/twig-tailwind-extra	`—`	direct
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/form	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/intl	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/security-csrf	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records