Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 21:30 UTC

tdiary / tdiary-core

tDiary, The TSUKKOMI-able Weblog.

RubyGPL-2.0★ 170 stars⑂ 70 forksgrowth anomalysince May 2010View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined

tdiary/tdiary-core holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (47/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

tDiaryOrganization
13 followers21 public repossince Apr 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemstdiary5.6.0-648 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
28.4/36Commit cadence — 41/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 286 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year286
human_commit_share0.84
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year41
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 55 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~173.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count55
latest_release_tagv5.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases173.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.7/60Stars — 170 stars, discounted for inorganic growth: 64 stars over 1 day(s) from 2010-05-29, 64× the repository's own daily baseline
9.2/25Forks — 70 forks, discounted for inorganic growth: 64 stars over 1 day(s) from 2010-05-29, 64× the repository's own daily baseline
8.1/15Watchers — 30 watchers
Inputs used
forks70
stars170
watchers30
growth_stateanomalous
growth_signalsacquisition_burst, fork_divergence, missing_decay
growth_windows2010-05-29/2010-05-29
growth_peak_days1
growth_factor_pct60
growth_peak_stars64
growth_peak_window2010-05-29
growth_peak_multiple64
growth_top_days_share0.415
growth_baseline_per_day1
growth_history_completeyes
Inorganic Growth Policy discounts the stars and forks components by 40%. The finding describes the timing of public star and fork events; it does not establish that attention was purchased, or that the maintainers were involved.
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54/80Total downloads — 158,972 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestdiary
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads158,972
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 38 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled38
top_contributor_share0.574
How it's scored
40.2/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 918/990 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs918
open_issues17
closed_issues379
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.957
closed_unmerged_prs72
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of tdiary
21.8/25Track record — 21 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintdiary
public_repos21
account_age_days6,001

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestdiary
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://tdiary.org/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsruby, blog, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://tdiary.org/
docs_sitehttps://tdiary.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.6

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages205
unassessed_packages11
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 205 resolved dependencies against OSV. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 76 of 84 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.905
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 39 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 16 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.39
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.16
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/280 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes44,057
source_files_sampled280
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

170GitHub stars
38contributors
286commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
55releases
1bus factor
17open issues
npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-19: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 170 stars today.
  • Could not fetch npm package 'tdiary-core' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 171 ★ / 70 ⇿
171Stars
70Forks
50Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-19. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

The shaded band marks the burst the Inorganic Growth Policy confirmed. How growth authenticity is assessed

0408012016020017170652010-052018-062026-07
Major 2Minor 8Patch 40

Each point covers 15 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 21:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsrack—Gemfile
RubyGemsrack-session—Gemfile
RubyGemsrackup—Gemfile
RubyGemshikidoc—Gemfile
RubyGemsfastimage—Gemfile
RubyGemsemot—Gemfile
RubyGemsmail—Gemfile
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemscgi—Gemfile
RubyGemspstore—Gemfile
RubyGemslogger—Gemfile
RubyGemspuma—Gemfile
RubyGemstdiary-contrib—Gemfile
RubyGemstdiary-style-gfm—Gemfile
RubyGemstdiary-style-rd—Gemfile
RubyGemsracc—Gemfile
RubyGemstdiary-io-mongodb—Gemfile
RubyGemsomniauth—Gemfile
RubyGemsomniauth-github—Gemfile
RubyGemsdalli—Gemfile
RubyGemsconnection_pool—Gemfile
RubyGemsmemcachier—Gemfile
All dependencies 216

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 188 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemscgi—direct
RubyGemscgi0.5.2direct
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2direct
RubyGemsdalli5.1.0direct
RubyGemsemot—direct
RubyGemsemot0.0.4direct
RubyGemsfastimage—direct
RubyGemsfastimage2.4.1direct
RubyGemshikidoc—direct
RubyGemshikidoc0.1.1direct
RubyGemslogger1.7.0direct
RubyGemsmail—direct
RubyGemsmail2.9.1direct
RubyGemsmemcachier0.0.2direct
RubyGemsomniauth2.1.4direct
RubyGemsomniauth-github2.0.1direct
RubyGemspstore—direct
RubyGemspstore0.2.1direct
RubyGemspuma8.0.2direct
RubyGemsracc1.8.1direct
RubyGemsrack—direct
RubyGemsrack3.2.7direct
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2direct
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1direct
RubyGemsrake—direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemstdiary-style-gfm1.4.0direct
RubyGemstdiary-style-rd0.0.3direct
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color3.2.0indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers5.0.2indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc2.1.4indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser3.0.10indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms3.0.5indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer3.0.4indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npmagent-base7.1.3indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.1.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcssstyle4.4.0indirect
npmdata-urls5.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.1indirect
npmdecimal.js10.5.0indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmentities6.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer4.0.0indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmiconv-lite0.6.3indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjasmine5.8.0indirect
npmjasmine-core5.8.0indirect
npmjasmine-jquery2.1.1indirect
npmjquery3.5.1indirect
npmjsdom24.1.3indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnwsapi2.2.20indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmparse57.3.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpsl1.15.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmquerystringify2.2.0indirect
npmrequires-port1.0.0indirect
npmrrweb-cssom0.7.1indirect
npmrrweb-cssom0.8.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtough-cookie4.1.4indirect
npmtr465.1.1indirect
npmuniversalify0.2.0indirect
npmurl-parse1.5.10indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions7.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-encoding3.1.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype4.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url14.2.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmws8.21.1indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel7.0.10indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport7.0.10indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsauth-sanitizer0.2.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbson5.2.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.40.0indirect
RubyGemschildprocess5.1.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemscuprite0.18indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday0.17.6indirect
RubyGemsferrum0.18.0indirect
RubyGemshashie5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsholiday_japan1.4.4indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsidn-ruby0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsjwt3.2.0indirect
RubyGemslaunchy3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2026.0701indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmongo2.24.1indirect
RubyGemsmongoid7.6.1indirect
RubyGemsmulti_xml0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.6indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnkf0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsoauth22.0.25indirect
RubyGemsomniauth-oauth21.9.0indirect
RubyGemspit0.0.7indirect
RubyGemspower_assert3.0.1indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemspushbullet_ruby1.1.4indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsracksh1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrake-compiler-dock1.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrb_sys0.9.128indirect
RubyGemsrdtool0.6.39indirect
RubyGemsredcarpet3.6.1indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml—indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssequel5.108.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov1.2.0indirect
RubyGemssnaky_hash2.0.7indirect
RubyGemssqlite32.9.6indirect
RubyGemstdiary5.6.0indirect
RubyGemstest-unit3.7.8indirect
RubyGemsthor—indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstwitter-text3.1.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunf0.1.4indirect
RubyGemsunf_ext0.0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem1.1.14indirect
RubyGemswebrick—indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 205 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
activesupport7.0.10indirecthigh38.1.2.1
brace-expansion2.1.2indirecthigh25.0.9

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.