Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 02:38 UTC

tdiary / tdiary-core

tDiary, The TSUKKOMI-able Weblog.

RubyGPL-2.0★ 171 stars⑂ 70 forksgrowth anomalysince May 2010View on GitHub ↗

tdiary/tdiary-core holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

tDiaryOrganization

11 followers21 public repossince Apr 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
RubyGems	tdiary	5.4.0	-	61	0 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

92Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27.7/36	Commit cadence — 40/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 236 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	236
human_commit_share	0.93
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	40

Release discipline

76Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 52 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~198.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	52
latest_release_tag	v5.5.0.beta2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	198.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

39Weak

Growth anomaly alert

Inorganic growth pattern detected

64 stars in a single day, 64× the baseline2010-05-29No fork response — the code was not touchedNo decay — the burst stopped deadPopularity & adoption: stars and forks discounted by 40%

Based on the timing of public star and fork events. It describes a pattern that organic attention does not produce; it does not establish that attention was purchased, or that the maintainers were involved.

How growth authenticity is assessed

How it's scored

21.7/60	Stars — 171 stars, discounted for inorganic growth: 64 stars over 1 day(s) from 2010-05-29, 64× the repository's own daily baseline
9.2/25	Forks — 70 forks, discounted for inorganic growth: 64 stars over 1 day(s) from 2010-05-29, 64× the repository's own daily baseline
8.1/15	Watchers — 30 watchers

Inputs used

forks	70
stars	171
watchers	30
growth_state	anomalous
growth_signals	acquisition_burst, fork_divergence, missing_decay
growth_windows	2010-05-29/2010-05-29
growth_peak_days	1
growth_factor_pct	60
growth_peak_stars	64
growth_peak_window	2010-05-29
growth_peak_multiple	64
growth_top_days_share	0.415
growth_baseline_per_day	1
growth_history_complete	yes

Inorganic Growth Policy discounts the stars and forks components by 40%. The finding describes the timing of public star and fork events; it does not establish that attention was purchased, or that the maintainers were involved.

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

67Good

How it's scored

53.8/80	Total downloads — 151,113 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	tdiary
dependents	—
ecosystems	rubygems
total_downloads	151,113
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 38 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	38
top_contributor_share	0.568

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good

How it's scored

39.9/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
27.8/30	PR acceptance — 893/963 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	893
open_issues	19
closed_issues	372
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.951
closed_unmerged_prs	70
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
7.8/25	Owner reach — 11 followers of tdiary
21.8/25	Track record — 21 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	11
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	tdiary
public_repos	21
account_age_days	5,948

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 61 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	tdiary
ecosystems	rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://tdiary.org/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ruby, blog, hacktoberfest
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://tdiary.org/
docs_site	https://tdiary.org/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	4.8

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	3
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	207
unassessed_packages	11
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 207 resolved dependencies against OSV. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 88 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.946
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

50Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 51 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Gemfile.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.51
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.07

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/276 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	44,057
source_files_sampled	276
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

171GitHub stars

38contributors

236commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

52releases

1bus factor

19open issues

npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Could not fetch npm package 'tdiary-core' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 171 ★ / 70 ⇿

171Stars

70Forks

50Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

The shaded band marks the burst the Inorganic Growth Policy confirmed. How growth authenticity is assessed

Major 2Minor 8Patch 40

Each point covers 15 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 02:38 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 21

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	rack	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rack-session	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rackup	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	hikidoc	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	fastimage	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	emot	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	mail	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rake	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	cgi	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	pstore	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	puma	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	tdiary-contrib	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	tdiary-style-gfm	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	tdiary-style-rd	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	racc	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	tdiary-io-mongodb	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	omniauth	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	omniauth-github	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	dalli	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	connection_pool	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	memcachier	`—`	Gemfile

All dependencies 218

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 191 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
RubyGems	cgi	`—`	direct
RubyGems	cgi	`0.5.2`	direct
RubyGems	connection_pool	`3.0.2`	direct
RubyGems	dalli	`5.0.5`	direct
RubyGems	emot	`—`	direct
RubyGems	emot	`0.0.4`	direct
RubyGems	fastimage	`—`	direct
RubyGems	fastimage	`2.4.1`	direct
RubyGems	hikidoc	`—`	direct
RubyGems	hikidoc	`0.1.1`	direct
RubyGems	mail	`—`	direct
RubyGems	mail	`2.9.1`	direct
RubyGems	memcachier	`0.0.2`	direct
RubyGems	omniauth	`2.1.4`	direct
RubyGems	omniauth-github	`2.0.1`	direct
RubyGems	pstore	`—`	direct
RubyGems	pstore	`0.2.1`	direct
RubyGems	puma	`8.0.2`	direct
RubyGems	racc	`1.8.1`	direct
RubyGems	rack	`—`	direct
RubyGems	rack	`3.2.6`	direct
RubyGems	rack-session	`2.1.2`	direct
RubyGems	rackup	`2.3.1`	direct
RubyGems	rake	`—`	direct
RubyGems	rake	`13.4.2`	direct
RubyGems	tdiary-style-gfm	`1.4.0`	direct
RubyGems	tdiary-style-rd	`0.0.3`	direct
npm	@asamuzakjp/css-color	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/color-helpers	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-calc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-color-parser	`3.0.10`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-parser-algorithms	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-tokenizer	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	cssstyle	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	data-urls	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	decimal.js	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	entities	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-potential-custom-element-name	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	jasmine	`5.8.0`	indirect
npm	jasmine-core	`5.8.0`	indirect
npm	jasmine-jquery	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	jquery	`3.5.1`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`24.1.3`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.9`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nwsapi	`2.2.20`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse5	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	psl	`1.15.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	querystringify	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	requires-port	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	saxes	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	symbol-tree	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`4.1.4`	indirect
npm	tr46	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	universalify	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	url-parse	`1.5.10`	indirect
npm	w3c-xmlserializer	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.1`	indirect
npm	xml-name-validator	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlchars	`2.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	activemodel	`7.0.10`	indirect
RubyGems	activesupport	`7.0.10`	indirect
RubyGems	addressable	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	anonymous_loader	`0.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	auth-sanitizer	`0.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	base64	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	benchmark	`0.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	bigdecimal	`4.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	bson	`5.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	capybara	`3.40.0`	indirect
RubyGems	childprocess	`5.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	coderay	`1.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	commonmarker	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.8`	indirect
RubyGems	date	`3.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	diff-lcs	`1.6.2`	indirect
RubyGems	docile	`1.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	drb	`2.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	faraday	`0.17.6`	indirect
RubyGems	hashie	`5.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	holiday_japan	`1.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n	`1.15.2`	indirect
RubyGems	idn-ruby	`0.1.5`	indirect
RubyGems	jwt	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	launchy	`3.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	matrix	`0.4.2`	indirect
RubyGems	mime-types	`3.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	mime-types-data	`3.2025.0603`	indirect
RubyGems	mini_mime	`1.1.5`	indirect
RubyGems	mini_portile2	`2.8.9`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest	`6.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	mongo	`2.24.1`	indirect
RubyGems	mongoid	`7.6.1`	indirect
RubyGems	multi_xml	`0.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	multipart-post	`2.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	mutex_m	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	net-imap	`0.5.15`	indirect
RubyGems	net-pop	`0.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	net-protocol	`0.2.2`	indirect
RubyGems	net-smtp	`0.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	nio4r	`2.7.5`	indirect
RubyGems	nkf	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nokogiri	`1.19.4`	indirect
RubyGems	oauth2	`2.0.25`	indirect
RubyGems	omniauth-oauth2	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	pit	`0.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	power_assert	`3.0.1`	indirect
RubyGems	prism	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	public_suffix	`7.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	pushbullet_ruby	`1.1.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rack-protection	`4.2.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rack-test	`2.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	racksh	`1.0.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rake-compiler-dock	`1.12.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rb_sys	`0.9.128`	indirect
RubyGems	rdtool	`0.6.39`	indirect
RubyGems	redcarpet	`3.6.1`	indirect
RubyGems	regexp_parser	`2.10.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`3.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec	`3.13.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-core	`3.13.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-expectations	`3.13.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-mocks	`3.13.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-support	`3.13.6`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby2_keywords	`0.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rubyzip	`2.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	securerandom	`0.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	selenium-webdriver	`4.33.0`	indirect
RubyGems	sequel	`5.106.0`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov	`0.22.0`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov-html	`0.13.1`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov_json_formatter	`0.1.4`	indirect
RubyGems	snaky_hash	`2.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	sqlite3	`2.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	tdiary	`5.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	test-unit	`3.7.8`	indirect
RubyGems	thor	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	thor	`1.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	timeout	`0.6.1`	indirect
RubyGems	twitter-text	`3.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	tzinfo	`2.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	unf	`0.1.4`	indirect
RubyGems	unf_ext	`0.0.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	version_gem	`1.1.14`	indirect
RubyGems	webrick	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	webrick	`1.9.2`	indirect
RubyGems	websocket	`1.2.11`	indirect
RubyGems	xpath	`3.2.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 207 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
activesupport	`7.0.10`	indirect	high	3	`8.1.2.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records