Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 10:33 UTC

teamneusta / pw_comments

Powerful TYPO3 CMS extension for providing comments, including replies on comments and votings, as well as mail notifications.

PHPNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 10 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindPluginhow this is determined

teamneusta/pw_comments holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

team neusta SEOrganization · verified domain

23 followers37 public repossince Jun 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	teamneusta/pw_comments	8.0.1	3,813	18	54 days ago	comment extension typo3 voting

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

50Moderate

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 31 days ago
4.8/36	Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 275 commits in the last year
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

commits_last_year	275
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	31
active_weeks_last_year	7

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 54 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~86.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	11
latest_release_tag	7.1.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	54
mean_days_between_releases	86.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 1 stars
8/25	Forks — 10 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	10
stars	1
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

50Moderate

How it's scored

47.8/80	Monthly downloads — 3,813 downloads/month across packagist
2/20	Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	teamneusta/pw_comments
dependents	1
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	71,912
monthly_downloads	3,813
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	14
top_contributor_share	0.601

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.7/30	PR acceptance — 36/42 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	36
open_issues	0
closed_issues	29
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	6
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

83Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
9.9/25	Owner reach — 23 followers of teamneusta
23.5/25	Track record — 37 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	23
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	teamneusta
public_repos	37
account_age_days	4,104

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 54 days ago
20/20	Version history — 18 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	teamneusta/pw_comments
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/pw_comments
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/pw_comments
docs_site	https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/pw_comments
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

38Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
6.8/7.5	Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	3.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	25
affected_packages	10
assessed_packages	143
unassessed_packages	10
affected_by_severity	critical 3, high 6, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 143 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

51Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
35.7/40	Legible commit history — 67 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.67
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
11/11	Static type checking — Build/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	Build/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — PHP with type-check config (Build/tsconfig.json)
54.3/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/76 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	82,378
source_files_sampled	76
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

1GitHub stars

14contributors

275commits, last 12 months

31days since last push

11releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿

0Stars

10Forks

9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 1Patch 5

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10

3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 10:32 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 1/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
9	Maintained	9 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 5

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`^14.3`	composer.json
Packagist	typo3/cms-backend	`^14.3`	composer.json
Packagist	typo3/cms-extbase	`^14.3`	composer.json
Packagist	typo3/cms-frontend	`^14.3`	composer.json
Packagist	typo3/cms-install	`^14.3`	composer.json

All dependencies 153

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 148 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	typo3/cms-backend	`—`	direct
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`—`	direct
Packagist	typo3/cms-extbase	`—`	direct
Packagist	typo3/cms-frontend	`—`	direct
Packagist	typo3/cms-install	`—`	direct
npm	@asamuzakjp/css-color	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/color-helpers	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-calc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-color-parser	`3.0.10`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-parser-algorithms	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-tokenizer	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@polka/url	`1.0.0-next.29`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loongarch64-gnu	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/jsdom	`21.1.7`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/tough-cookie	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/ui	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	chai	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	check-error	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	cssstyle	`4.6.0`	indirect
npm	data-urls	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	decimal.js	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	entities	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.25.5`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.4.6`	indirect
npm	fflate	`0.8.2`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	is-potential-custom-element-name	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`26.1.0`	indirect
npm	loupe	`3.1.4`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.17`	indirect
npm	mrmime	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect
npm	nwsapi	`2.2.20`	indirect
npm	parse5	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	pathval	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.44.1`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	saxes	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	sirv	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.9.0`	indirect
npm	strip-literal	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	symbol-tree	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.14`	indirect
npm	tinypool	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinyspy	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	tldts	`6.1.86`	indirect
npm	tldts-core	`6.1.86`	indirect
npm	totalist	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	tr46	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.8.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.8.0`	indirect
npm	vite	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	vite-node	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	vitest	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	w3c-xmlserializer	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.18.2`	indirect
npm	xml-name-validator	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlchars	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpcov	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	roave/security-advisories	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/testing-framework	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 143 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
rollup	`4.44.1`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
vitest	`3.2.4`	indirect	critical	2	`5.0.0-rc.2`
fflate	`0.8.2`	indirect	high	1	`0.8.3`
nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect	high	3	`5.1.16`
picomatch	`4.0.2`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
vite	`7.0.0`	indirect	high	7	`8.0.16`
ws	`8.18.2`	indirect	high	2	`8.21.0`
@vitest/mocker	`3.2.4`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.0-rc.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records