Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 10:09 UTC

temporalio / sdk-php

Temporal PHP SDK

PHPMIT★ 416 stars⑂ 61 forkssince Sep 2020View on GitHub ↗

temporalio/sdk-php holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

temporal.ioOrganization
3,629 followers218 public repossince Oct 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagisttemporal/sdkv2.17.1255,00391148 days agoapilibraryworkflowsdkactivitytemporalevent-sourcingservice-bus

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence32/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume192 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year192
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year32
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases90 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 148 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~42.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count90
latest_release_tagv2.17.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release148
mean_days_between_releases42.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.5/60Stars416 stars
14.8/25Forks61 forks
6.4/15Watchers15 watchers
Inputs used
forks61
stars416
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges16
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
72.1/80Monthly downloads255,003 downloads/month across packagist
8.9/20Registry dependents21 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagestemporal/sdk
dependents21
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads3,221,182
monthly_downloads255,003
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 69% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth43 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 37 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled43
top_contributor_share0.693
How it's scored
37.8/42Issue resolution90% of issues closed
26.5/30PR acceptance436/493 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs436
open_issues28
closed_issues249
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.899
closed_unmerged_prs57
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach3,629 followers of temporalio
25/25Track record218 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,629
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logintemporalio
public_repos218
account_age_days2,487
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 148 days ago
20/20Version history91 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestemporal/sdk
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish148

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://php.preview.thundergun.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstemporal, php, roadrunner, hacktoberfest, workflow, workflow-engine, durable-execution, orchestration, temporal-sdk
has_wikino
homepagehttps://php.preview.thundergun.io
docs_sitehttps://php.preview.thundergun.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 37 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate7.3
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier75
security_posture_after_multiplier55
security_posture_before_jurisdiction73
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages36
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 36 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history94 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.979
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1,111 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes55,349
source_files_sampled1,111
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)testing/proto/temporal/api/testservice/v1/request_response.proto, testing/proto/temporal/api/testservice/v1/service.proto, tests/Fixtures/src/Proto/test.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filestesting/proto/temporal/api/testservice/v1/request_response.proto, testing/proto/temporal/api/testservice/v1/service.proto, tests/Fixtures/src/Proto/test.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

416GitHub stars
43contributors
192commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
90releases
1bus factor
28open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 61 ⇿
0Stars
61Forks
90Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

013253850636132020-112023-092026-07
Major 2Minor 21Patch 54

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10
7.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 10:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 37 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistgoogle/common-protos^4.9composer.json
Packagistgoogle/protobuf^4.33.6 || ^5.34.0composer.json
Packagistgrpc/grpc^1.57composer.json
Packagistinternal/destroy^1.0composer.json
Packagistinternal/promise^3.4composer.json
Packagistnesbot/carbon^2.72.6 || ^3.8.4composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^2.0 || ^3.0.2composer.json
Packagistramsey/uuid^4.7.6composer.json
Packagistroadrunner-php/roadrunner-api-dto^1.14.0composer.json
Packagistroadrunner-php/version-checker^1.0.2composer.json
Packagistspiral/attributes^3.1.8composer.json
Packagistspiral/roadrunner^2025.1.5composer.json
Packagistspiral/roadrunner-cli^2.6composer.json
Packagistspiral/roadrunner-kv^4.3.1composer.json
Packagistspiral/roadrunner-worker^3.6.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^5.4.45 || ^6.4.13 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client^5.4.53 || ^6.4.17 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php83^1.31.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^5.4.51 || ^6.4.15 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 37

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistgoogle/common-protosdirect
Packagistgoogle/protobufdirect
Packagistgrpc/grpcdirect
Packagistinternal/destroydirect
Packagistinternal/promisedirect
Packagistnesbot/carbondirect
Packagistpsr/logdirect
Packagistramsey/uuiddirect
Packagistroadrunner-php/roadrunner-api-dtodirect
Packagistroadrunner-php/version-checkerdirect
Packagistspiral/attributesdirect
Packagistspiral/roadrunnerdirect
Packagistspiral/roadrunner-clidirect
Packagistspiral/roadrunner-kvdirect
Packagistspiral/roadrunner-workerdirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystemdirect
Packagistsymfony/http-clientdirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php83direct
Packagistsymfony/processdirect
Packagistbuggregator/trapindirect
Packagistcomposer/composerindirect
Packagistcweagans/composer-patchesindirect
Packagistdereuromark/composer-prefer-lowestindirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotationsindirect
Packagistext-curlindirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistext-simplexmlindirect
Packagistinternal/dloadindirect
Packagistinternal/tomlindirect
Packagistjetbrains/phpstorm-attributesindirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-codeindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit10.5.63indirect
Packagistspiral/code-styleindirect
Packagistspiral/coreindirect
Packagistta-tikoma/phpunit-architecture-testindirect
Packagistvimeo/psalmindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 36 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.