Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 14:25 UTC

tenzir / tree-sitter-tql

Tree-sitter grammar for TQL

JavaScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗

tenzir/tree-sitter-tql holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (76/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TenzirOrganization
56 followers62 public repossince May 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/tenzir/tree-sitter-tqlv1.1.1-65 days ago
npmtree-sitter-tql1.1.12,07845 days agoincrementalparsingtree-sittertql

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume101 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year101
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases6 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~59.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv1.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases59.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.2/80Monthly downloads2,078 downloads/month across go, npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/tenzir/tree-sitter-tql, tree-sitter-tql
dependents
ecosystemsgo, npm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,078
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.962
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance6/6 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
12.6/25Owner reach56 followers of tenzir
25/25Track record62 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logintenzir
public_repos62
account_age_days3,341
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on go, npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history6 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/tenzir/tree-sitter-tql, tree-sitter-tql
ecosystemsgo, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages132
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 132 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.2/40Legible commit history21 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.21
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,607
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingbindings/python/tree_sitter_tql/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsbindings/python/tree_sitter_tql/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (bindings/python/tree_sitter_tql/py.typed)
53/55Manageable file sizes1/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes554,560
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
3contributors
101commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Go, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'tree-sitter-tql' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'tree-sitter-tql' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index npm:tree-sitter-tql@1.1.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 14:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotree-sitter-language0.1Cargo.toml
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitterv0.24.0go.mod
npmnode-addon-api^8.9.0package.json
npmnode-gyp-build^4.8.4package.json
All dependencies 137

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 133 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iotree-sitter-languagedirect
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitter0.24.0direct
npmnode-addon-api8.9.0direct
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4direct
crates.ioccindirect
crates.iotree-sitterindirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@types/debug4.1.13indirect
npm@types/katex0.16.8indirect
npm@types/ms2.1.0indirect
npm@types/unist2.0.11indirect
npmabbrev5.0.0indirect
npmadm-zip0.6.0indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbl4.1.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.7indirect
npmbuffer5.7.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities2.0.2indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcharacter-reference-invalid2.0.1indirect
npmchownr1.1.4indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmcommander15.0.0indirect
npmcommander8.3.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecode-named-character-reference1.3.0indirect
npmdeep-extend0.6.0indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.5indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmexponential-backoff3.1.3indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfs-constants1.0.0indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmgithub-actionlint1.7.12indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmini7.0.0indirect
npmis-alphabetical2.0.1indirect
npmis-alphanumerical2.0.1indirect
npmis-decimal2.0.1indirect
npmis-hexadecimal2.0.1indirect
npmisexe4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml5.2.1indirect
npmjsonc-parser3.3.1indirect
npmjsonpointer5.0.1indirect
npmkatex0.16.47indirect
npmlefthook2.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-darwin-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-darwin-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-freebsd-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-freebsd-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-linux-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-linux-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-openbsd-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-openbsd-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-windows-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-windows-x642.1.10indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmarkdownlint0.41.1indirect
npmmarkdownlint-cli0.49.1indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmmicromark4.0.2indirect
npmmicromark-core-commonmark2.0.3indirect
npmmicromark-extension-directive4.0.0indirect
npmmicromark-extension-gfm-autolink-literal2.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-extension-gfm-footnote2.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-extension-gfm-table2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-extension-math3.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-factory-destination2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-label2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-space2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-title2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-whitespace2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-chunked2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-classify-character2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-combine-extensions2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-decode-numeric-character-reference2.0.2indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-html-tag-name2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-normalize-identifier2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-resolve-all2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-subtokenize2.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmmkdirp-classic0.5.3indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-abi3.94.0indirect
npmnode-gyp13.0.1indirect
npmnopt10.0.1indirect
npmnpm-run-path3.1.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparse-entities4.0.2indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmprebuildify6.0.1indirect
npmprettier3.9.5indirect
npmproc-log7.0.0indirect
npmpump3.0.4indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmrun-con1.3.3indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsmol-toml1.7.0indirect
npmstring-width8.2.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmtar7.5.20indirect
npmtar-fs2.1.5indirect
npmtar-stream2.2.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtree-sitter0.25.0indirect
npmtree-sitter-cli0.25.4indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmundici8.7.0indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwhich7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPItree-sitterindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 132 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo, npm.