Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 06:45 UTC

tenzir / tree-sitter-tql

Tree-sitter grammar for TQL

JavaScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗

tenzir/tree-sitter-tql holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TenzirOrganization · verified domain
57 followers65 public repossince May 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/tenzir/tree-sitter-tqlv1.2.0-822 days ago—
npmtree-sitter-tql1.2.02,485622 days agoincrementalparsingtree-sittertql

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 22 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 107 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year107
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push22
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~47.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv1.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases47.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,485 downloads/month across go, npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/tenzir/tree-sitter-tql, tree-sitter-tql
dependents—
ecosystemsgo, npm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,485
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.936
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 10/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
12.7/25Owner reach — 57 followers of tenzir
25/25Track record — 65 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers57
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logintenzir
public_repos65
account_age_days3,393

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go, npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history — 8 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/tenzir/tree-sitter-tql, tree-sitter-tql
ecosystemsgo, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:tree-sitter-tql@1.2.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.tenzir.com/llms.txt)
12.3/40Legible commit history — 23 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.tenzir.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.23
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,607
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — bindings/python/tree_sitter_tql/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsbindings/python/tree_sitter_tql/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (bindings/python/tree_sitter_tql/py.typed)
53/55Manageable file sizes — 1/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes659,271
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
3contributors
107commits, last 12 months
22days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Go, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'tree-sitter-tql' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'tree-sitter-tql' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 06:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests8 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotree-sitter-language0.1Cargo.toml
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitterv0.24.0go.mod
npmnode-addon-api^8.9.1package.json
npmnode-gyp-build^4.8.4package.json
All dependencies 137

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 133 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iotree-sitter-language—direct
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitter0.24.0direct
npmnode-addon-api8.9.1direct
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4direct
crates.iocc—indirect
crates.iotree-sitter—indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@types/debug4.1.13indirect
npm@types/katex0.16.8indirect
npm@types/ms2.1.0indirect
npm@types/unist2.0.11indirect
npmabbrev5.0.0indirect
npmadm-zip0.6.0indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbl4.1.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbuffer5.7.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities2.0.2indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcharacter-reference-invalid2.0.1indirect
npmchownr1.1.4indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmcommander15.0.0indirect
npmcommander8.3.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecode-named-character-reference1.3.0indirect
npmdeep-extend0.6.0indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.5indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmexponential-backoff3.1.3indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfs-constants1.0.0indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmgithub-actionlint1.7.12indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmini7.0.0indirect
npmis-alphabetical2.0.1indirect
npmis-alphanumerical2.0.1indirect
npmis-decimal2.0.1indirect
npmis-hexadecimal2.0.1indirect
npmisexe4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml5.2.3indirect
npmjsonc-parser3.3.1indirect
npmjsonpointer5.0.1indirect
npmkatex0.16.47indirect
npmlefthook2.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-darwin-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-darwin-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-freebsd-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-freebsd-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-linux-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-linux-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-openbsd-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-openbsd-x642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-windows-arm642.1.10indirect
npmlefthook-windows-x642.1.10indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmarkdownlint0.41.1indirect
npmmarkdownlint-cli0.49.1indirect
npmmdurl2.1.0indirect
npmmicromark4.0.2indirect
npmmicromark-core-commonmark2.0.3indirect
npmmicromark-extension-directive4.0.0indirect
npmmicromark-extension-gfm-autolink-literal2.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-extension-gfm-footnote2.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-extension-gfm-table2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-extension-math3.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-factory-destination2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-label2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-space2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-title2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-factory-whitespace2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-chunked2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-classify-character2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-combine-extensions2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-decode-numeric-character-reference2.0.2indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-html-tag-name2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-normalize-identifier2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-resolve-all2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-subtokenize2.1.0indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmmkdirp-classic0.5.3indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-abi3.94.0indirect
npmnode-gyp13.0.1indirect
npmnopt10.0.1indirect
npmnpm-run-path3.1.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparse-entities4.0.2indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmprebuildify6.0.1indirect
npmprettier3.9.6indirect
npmproc-log7.0.0indirect
npmpump3.0.4indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmrun-con1.3.3indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsmol-toml1.7.1indirect
npmstring-width8.2.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmtar7.5.22indirect
npmtar-fs2.1.5indirect
npmtar-stream2.2.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtree-sitter0.25.1indirect
npmtree-sitter-cli0.26.11indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmundici8.10.0indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwhich7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPItree-sitter—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:tree-sitter-tql@1.2.0 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm.