Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 20:35 UTC

tig / winprint

Human and AI Agent friendly print utility with syntax highlighting, markdown support, multiple pages-up, headers/footers. Cross platform (Mac, Linux, Windows) GUI and TUI. Print source code, web pages, and reports generated by legacy systems.

C# · HTMLMIT★ 102 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindMobile applicationTerminal interfacehow this is determined
#printing#source-code#syntax-highlighting#windows#windows-app#dotnet#text-files#csharp#linux#macos#lpr#print#tui#markdown-pdf-export#markdown-printer

tig/winprint holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TigPersonal account
172 followers97 public repossince Jan 2011@gui-cs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

63Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 14 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 649 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year649
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 52 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 64 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count52
latest_release_tagv3.1.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release64
mean_days_between_releases1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

40Weak
How it's scored
32.5/60Stars — 102 stars
7/25Forks — 8 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars102
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.956

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good
How it's scored
39.2/42Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 142/168 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs142
open_issues7
closed_issues97
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.933
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.1/25Owner reach — 172 followers of tig
25/25Track record — 97 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers172
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logintig
public_repos97
account_age_days5,713
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

70Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://tig.github.io/winprint/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsprinting, source-code, syntax-highlighting, windows, windows-app, dotnet, text-files, csharp, linux, macos, lpr, print, tui, markdown-pdf-export, markdown-printer
has_wikino
homepagehttps://tig.github.io/winprint/
docs_sitehttps://tig.github.io/winprint/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

53Moderate
How it's scored
7.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: System.Drawing.Common 4.7.0 (critical 9.8)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.1/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,578 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages3
assessed_packages66
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitycritical 3
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 66 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 84 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.84
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes19,118

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj, src/WinPrint.Maui/WinPrint.Maui.csproj, src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 29 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.29
toolchain_manifestssrc/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj, src/WinPrint.Maui/WinPrint.Maui.csproj, src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj, src/libvt100/libvt100.csproj, tests/WinPrint.Core.UnitTests/WinPrint.Core.UnitTests.csproj, tests/WinPrint.Maui.UITests/WinPrint.Maui.UITests.csproj, tests/WinPrint.Maui.UnitTests/WinPrint.Maui.UnitTests.csproj, tests/WinPrint.TUI.UITests/WinPrint.TUI.UITests.csproj, tests/WinPrint.TUI.UnitTests/WinPrint.TUI.UnitTests.csproj, tools/WinPrint.Analyzers/WinPrint.Analyzers.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/404 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes56,100
source_files_sampled404
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

102GitHub stars
2contributors
649commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
52releases
1bus factor
7open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812022-012024-042026-06
Major 0Minor 1Patch 3

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 20:35 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMarkdig1.3.2src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetMermaider0.9.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSvg.Skia5.1.1src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetHtmlRenderer.Core.NetStandard21.5.1.3src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetOnigwrap1.0.11src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSerilog4.1.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.0.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Debug3.0.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File6.0.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp3.119.2src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetTextMateSharp2.0.*src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetTextMateSharp.Grammars2.0.*src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetUTF.Unknown2.5.1src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetVelopack1.1.1src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.ApplicationInsights4.0.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common10.0.0src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux3.119.2src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.macOS3.119.2src/WinPrint.Core/WinPrint.Core.csproj
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1src/WinPrint.Maui/WinPrint.Maui.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Controls$(MauiVersion)src/WinPrint.Maui/WinPrint.Maui.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.0src/WinPrint.Maui/WinPrint.Maui.csproj
NuGetVelopack1.1.1src/WinPrint.Maui/WinPrint.Maui.csproj
NuGetTerminal.Gui2.5.0-beta.1src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj
NuGetTerminal.Gui.Cli0.3.0src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj
NuGetTerminal.Gui.Editor2.5.5src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj
NuGetVelopack1.1.1src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp3.1.11src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing2.1.6src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.Fonts2.1.3src/WinPrint.TUI/WinPrint.TUI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0tools/WinPrint.Analyzers/WinPrint.Analyzers.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.11.0tools/WinPrint.Analyzers/WinPrint.Analyzers.csproj
All dependencies 69

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 36 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCommandLineParser2.6.0direct
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1direct
NuGetHtmlRenderer.Core.NetStandard21.5.1.3direct
NuGetMarkdig1.3.2direct
NuGetMermaider0.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.11.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Controls—direct
NuGetOnigwrap1.0.11direct
NuGetSerilog2.9.1-dev-01154direct
NuGetSerilog4.1.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.ApplicationInsights4.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Debug3.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File6.0.0direct
NuGetSixLabors.Fonts2.1.3direct
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp3.1.11direct
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing2.1.6direct
NuGetSkiaSharp3.119.2direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux3.119.2direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.macOS3.119.2direct
NuGetSvg.Skia5.1.1direct
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common10.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common4.7.0direct
NuGetTerminal.Gui2.5.0-beta.1direct
NuGetTerminal.Gui.Cli0.3.0direct
NuGetTerminal.Gui.Editor2.5.5direct
NuGetTextMateSharp—direct
NuGetTextMateSharp.Grammars—direct
NuGetUTF.Unknown2.5.1direct
NuGetVelopack1.1.1direct
NuGetColorCode.HTML2.0.6indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.2indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers2.9.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics10.0.20indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.3.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.UniversalWindowsPlatform6.2.9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.PowerShell.Commands.Diagnostics7.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.PowerShell.Commands.Management7.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.PowerShell.ConsoleHost7.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Toolkit.Uwp.UI.Controls5.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.UI.Xaml2.2.190917002indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Win32.Registry4.7.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Xaml.Behaviors.Uwp.Managed2.0.1indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter2.0.0indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework2.0.0indirect
NuGetMvvmLightLibsStd105.4.1.1indirect
NuGetMvvmLightStd105.4.1.2indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetNUnit3.12.0indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter3.15.1indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.XUnit3.0.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Dynamic.Runtime4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Dynamic.Core1.0.19indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Dynamic.Core1.1.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Management.Automation7.0.0indirect
NuGetWixSharp1.14.3indirect
NuGetWixSharp.bin1.14.3indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.2indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 66 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
System.Drawing.Common4.7.0directcritical15.0.3
System.Linq.Dynamic.Core1.0.19indirectcritical21.6.0
System.Linq.Dynamic.Core1.1.0indirectcritical21.6.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with tig/winprint. Read them side by side →

100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional99pypa/cibuildwheel🎡 Build Python wheels for all the platforms with minimal configuration. Exceptional98wasmerio/wasmer🚀 Fast, secure, lightweight containers based on WebAssemblyExceptional98spack/spackA flexible package manager that supports multiple versions, configurations, platforms, and compilers.Exceptional98nodejs/nodeNode.js JavaScript runtime ✨🐢🚀✨Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.