Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 20:13 UTC

tigerfintech / openapi-python-sdk

Python SDK for Tiger Open API

PythonNo license detected★ 148 stars⑂ 27 forkssince Nov 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#python#quant#openapi#tigerbrokers#trade

tigerfintech/openapi-python-sdk holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Security (19/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

tigerfintechOrganization
33 followers35 public repossince Sep 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPItigeropen3.8.024,1151251 day agotigerbrokersopenapitradingquantfinance

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

89Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 353 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year353
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year36

Release discipline

76Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~135.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv3.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases135.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

52Moderate
How it's scored
35.2/60Stars — 148 stars
11.8/25Forks — 27 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks27
stars148
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

73Good
How it's scored
58.4/80Monthly downloads — 24,115 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestigeropen
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads24,115
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.859

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
36.3/42Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 51/54 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs51
open_issues5
closed_issues32
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.865
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11/25Owner reach — 33 followers of tigerfintech
23.3/25Track record — 35 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers33
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintigerfintech
public_repos35
account_age_days3,640

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 125 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestigeropen
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.itigerup.com/docs
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, quant, openapi, tigerbrokers, trade
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.itigerup.com/docs
docs_sitehttps://docs.itigerup.com/docs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

19Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

19Critical
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate1.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

47Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 18 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.18
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.3/55Manageable file sizes — 7/231 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes185,489
source_files_sampled231
oversized_source_files7

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — tigeropen/push/pb/AssetData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/KlineData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/OptionTopData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/OrderStatusData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/OrderTransactionData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/PositionData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/PushData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteBBOData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteBasicData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteDepthData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/Request.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/Response.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/SocketCommon.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/StockTopData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/TickData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/TradeTickData.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filestigeropen/push/pb/AssetData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/KlineData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/OptionTopData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/OrderStatusData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/OrderTransactionData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/PositionData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/PushData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteBBOData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteBasicData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/QuoteDepthData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/Request.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/Response.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/SocketCommon.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/StockTopData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/TickData.proto, tigeropen/push/pb/TradeTickData.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

148GitHub stars
6contributors
353commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
5open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:tigeropen@3.8.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 27 ⇿
0Stars
27Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302722021-062023-122026-06
Major 0Minor 3Patch 20

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.9 / 10
1.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 20:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIsimplejson—pyproject.toml
PyPIdelorean—pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas—pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil—pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz—pyproject.toml
PyPIpyasn1—pyproject.toml
PyPIrsa—pyproject.toml
PyPIstomp.py—pyproject.toml
PyPIgetmac—pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography—pyproject.toml
PyPIbackoff—pyproject.toml
PyPIjproperties—pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf—pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3—pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbackoff—direct
PyPIclick—direct
PyPIcryptography—direct
PyPIdelorean—direct
PyPIgetmac—direct
PyPIjproperties—direct
PyPIpandas—direct
PyPIprotobuf—direct
PyPIpyasn1—direct
PyPIpython-dateutil—direct
PyPIpytz—direct
PyPIrsa—direct
PyPIsimplejson—direct
PyPIstomp-py—direct
PyPIurllib3—direct
PyPI-—indirect
PyPImcp—indirect
PyPItigeropen—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with tigerfintech/openapi-python-sdk. Read them side by side →

99nautechsystems/nautilus_traderProduction-grade Rust-native trading engine with deterministic event-driven architectureExceptional99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional97plotly/dashData Apps & Dashboards for Python. No JavaScript Required.Exceptional100huggingface/transformers🤗 Transformers: the model-definition framework for state-of-the-art machine learning models in text, vision, audio, and multimodal models, for both inference and training. Exceptional100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional100matplotlib/matplotlibmatplotlib: plotting with PythonExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.