Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 21:39 UTC

tighten / jigsaw

Simple static sites with Laravel’s Blade.

HTML · PHPMIT★ 2,251 stars⑂ 188 forkssince May 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#jigsaw#laravel#blade#php#static-site-generator#jamstack

tighten/jigsaw holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated 33 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TightenOrganization
295 followers105 public repossince Jul 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagisttightenco/jigsawv1.8.85,181105115 days agogeneratorstaticsitelaravelblade

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

45Weak
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 33 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume — 65 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year65
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push33
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 89 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 115 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~42.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count89
latest_release_tagv1.8.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release115
mean_days_between_releases42.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

83Excellent
How it's scored
54.4/60Stars — 2,251 stars
18.9/25Forks — 188 forks
9.3/15Watchers — 48 watchers
Inputs used
forks188
stars2,251
watchers48
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate
How it's scored
49.5/80Monthly downloads — 5,181 downloads/month across packagist
10/20Registry dependents — 31 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagestightenco/jigsaw
dependents31
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads464,921
monthly_downloads5,181
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 55% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 79 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled79
top_contributor_share0.553

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
41.9/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
22.7/30PR acceptance — 206/272 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs206
open_issues1
closed_issues444
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.998
closed_unmerged_prs66
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

73Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.8/25Owner reach — 295 followers of tighten
25/25Track record — 105 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers295
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintighten
public_repos105
account_age_days4,793

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 115 days ago
20/20Version history — 105 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestightenco/jigsaw
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish115

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://jigsaw.tighten.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjigsaw, laravel, blade, php, static-site-generator, jamstack
has_wikino
homepagehttps://jigsaw.tighten.com
docs_sitehttps://jigsaw.tighten.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories15
affected_packages4
assessed_packages119
unassessed_packages24
affected_by_severityhigh 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 119 resolved dependencies against OSV. 24 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

23At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23/40Legible commit history — 38 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.432
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HTML without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/220 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes20,830
source_files_sampled220
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2,251GitHub stars
79contributors
65commits, last 12 months
33days since last push
89releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 188 ⇿
0Stars
188Forks
85Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020018662015-122021-042026-08
Major 1Minor 11Patch 73

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 21:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 5/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/collections^11.0 || ^12.0 || ^13.0 || dev-mastercomposer.json
Packagistilluminate/console^11.0 || ^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/container^11.0 || ^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/filesystem^11.0 || ^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/queue^11.0 || ^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^11.0 || ^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/view^11.0 || ^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistleague/commonmark^2.4composer.json
Packagistmichelf/php-markdown^2.0composer.json
Packagistmnapoli/front-yaml^2.0composer.json
Packagistnunomaduro/collision^8.1composer.json
Packagistramsey/uuid^4.9composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-ignition^2.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/error-handler^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/finder^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv^5.6composer.json
All dependencies 143

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 123 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistilluminate/collections—direct
Packagistilluminate/console—direct
Packagistilluminate/container—direct
Packagistilluminate/filesystem—direct
Packagistilluminate/queue—direct
Packagistilluminate/support—direct
Packagistilluminate/view—direct
Packagistleague/commonmark—direct
Packagistmichelf/php-markdown—direct
Packagistmnapoli/front-yaml—direct
Packagistnunomaduro/collision—direct
Packagistramsey/uuid—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-ignition—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/error-handler—direct
Packagistsymfony/finder—direct
Packagistsymfony/process—direct
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml—direct
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv—direct
npm@ampproject/remapping2.3.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.4.3indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.4.3indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.0.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.1indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.8indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime0.2.10indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.59.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.59.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.1.8indirect
npm@tailwindcss/vite4.1.8indirect
npm@tighten/jigsaw-vite-plugin1.0.1indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.9.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npmasync1.5.2indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.0.4indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.18.1indirect
npmesbuild0.25.1indirect
npmfdir6.4.5indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhasbin1.2.3indirect
npmjiti2.4.2indirect
npmlaravel-vite-plugin1.2.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.30.1indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.30.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.17indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.9indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.3indirect
npmrollup4.59.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.1.8indirect
npmtapable2.2.2indirect
npmtar7.5.11indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.14indirect
npmtslib2.8.0indirect
npmvite6.4.2indirect
npmvite-plugin-full-reload1.2.0indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint—indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 119 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 24 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.9indirecthigh35.1.16
postcss8.5.3indirecthigh48.5.23
tar7.5.11indirecthigh67.5.21
vite6.4.2indirecthigh28.0.16

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with tighten/jigsaw. Read them side by side →

94statamic/cmsThe core Laravel CMS Composer packageExceptional94decaporg/decap-cmsA Git-based CMS for Static Site GeneratorsExceptional98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional95laravel/frameworkLaravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax.Exceptional94craftcms/cmsBuild bespoke content experiences with Craft.Exceptional94getsentry/sentry-laravelThe official Laravel SDK for Sentry (sentry.io)Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.