Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-07 02:20 UTC
tls-attacker / TLS-Attacker
TLS-Attacker is a Java-based framework for analyzing TLS libraries. It can be used to manually test TLS clients and servers or as as a software library for more advanced tools.
tls-attacker/TLS-Attacker holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Security (42/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
69
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
TLS-AttackerOrganization
59 followers42 public repossince Feb 2019
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:utils | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-core | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-mitm | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-proxy | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:trace-tool | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:transport | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-client | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-server | 7.8.0 | - | 26 | 37 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
84
Development activity
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 1 days ago |
| 25.6/36 | Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 296 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 296 |
| human_commit_share | 0.98 |
| days_since_last_push | 1 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 37 |
Release discipline
76Good
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 42 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 37 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~124.4 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 42 |
| latest_release_tag | v7.0.0-rtc |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 37 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 124.4 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
63
Popularity & adoption
75Good
How it's scored
| 47.8/60 | Stars — 880 stars |
| 18/25 | Forks — 147 forks |
| 9.5/15 | Watchers — 52 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 147 |
| stars | 880 |
| watchers | 52 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 2 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
61
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 11.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 51% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 92 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 92 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.506 |
How it's scored
| 36.2/42 | Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed |
| 9/30 | PR acceptance — 22/73 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 22 |
| open_issues | 22 |
| closed_issues | 137 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 1 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.862 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 51 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 1 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 1 |
Ownership & stewardship
67Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 12.8/25 | Owner reach — 59 followers of tls-attacker |
| 23.9/25 | Track record — 42 public repos, account ~7 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 59 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | tls-attacker |
| public_repos | 42 |
| account_age_days | 2,770 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on maven |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 37 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 26 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:utils, de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-core, de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-mitm, de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-proxy, de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:trace-tool, de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:transport, de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-client, de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-server |
| ecosystems | maven |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 37 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
56
Engineering practices
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 2 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
42
Security posture
42Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.2 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
41Weak
How it's scored
| 11/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on 1.81 (high 7.7), org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on 1.81 (moderate 5.3), org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api 2.25.1 (low), +1 more |
| 6.8/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.19.1 (high 7.5), com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.19.1 (high 8.1), junit:junit 4.10 (moderate 4.4) |
| 23.3/40 | No advisories left outstanding — 5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,155 days ago |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 16 |
| affected_packages | 7 |
| assessed_packages | 45 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | high 3, moderate 2, low 2 |
| direct_affected_packages | 4 |
Matched the maven:de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:utils@7.8.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 45 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
55
Agent context & guidance
12Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 12/40 | Legible commit history — 22 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.224 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — TLS-Client/pom.xml, TLS-Core/pom.xml, TLS-Mitm/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Java (statically typed) |
| 0/10 | Reproducible environment |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | TLS-Client/pom.xml, TLS-Core/pom.xml, TLS-Mitm/pom.xml, TLS-Proxy/pom.xml, TLS-Server/pom.xml, TraceTool/pom.xml, Transport/pom.xml, Utils/pom.xml, pom.xml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.01 |
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed) |
| 54.8/55 | Manageable file sizes — 7/2,086 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Java |
| largest_source_bytes | 178,992 |
| source_files_sampled | 2,086 |
| oversized_source_files | 7 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
880GitHub stars
92contributors
296commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
42releases
1bus factor
22open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 147 ⇿
0Stars
147Forks
41Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 8Patch 14
Each point covers 10 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 19 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 39
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:tls-core | — | TLS-Client/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:transport | — | TLS-Client/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:utils | — | TLS-Client/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:transport | — | TLS-Core/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:utils | — | TLS-Core/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:tls-core | — | TLS-Mitm/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:utils | — | TLS-Mitm/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:tls-core | — | TLS-Proxy/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:transport | — | TLS-Proxy/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:tls-core | — | TLS-Server/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:tls-core | — | TraceTool/pom.xml |
| Maven | ${project.groupId}:utils | — | Transport/pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-attacker | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-client | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-core | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-mitm | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-proxy | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-server | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:trace-tool | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:transport | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:utils | ${project.version} | pom.xml |
| Maven | com.beust:jcommander | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | com.google.guava:guava | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | com.googlecode.json-simple:json-simple | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:asn1-attacker | 4.2.3 | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:modifiable-variable | 5.3.0 | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:protocol-attacker | 2.2.2 | pom.xml |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:x509-attacker | 4.3.10 | pom.xml |
| Maven | dnsjava:dnsjava | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | jakarta.xml.bind:jakarta.xml.bind-api | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.cryptomator:siv-mode | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.glassfish.jaxb:jaxb-runtime | — | pom.xml |
| Maven | org.reflections:reflections | — | pom.xml |
All dependencies 50
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 23 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | com.beust:jcommander | — | direct |
| Maven | com.google.guava:guava | — | direct |
| Maven | com.googlecode.json-simple:json-simple | — | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-attacker | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-client | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-core | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-mitm | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-proxy | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:tls-server | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:trace-tool | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:transport | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:utils | 7.8.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:asn1-attacker | 4.2.3 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:modifiable-variable | 5.3.0 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:protocol-attacker | 2.2.2 | direct |
| Maven | de.rub.nds:x509-attacker | 4.3.10 | direct |
| Maven | dnsjava:dnsjava | — | direct |
| Maven | jakarta.xml.bind:jakarta.xml.bind-api | — | direct |
| Maven | org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 | — | direct |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api | — | direct |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core | — | direct |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl | — | direct |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on | — | direct |
| Maven | org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on | — | direct |
| Maven | org.cryptomator:siv-mode | — | direct |
| Maven | org.glassfish.jaxb:jaxb-runtime | — | direct |
| Maven | org.reflections:reflections | — | direct |
| Maven | com.diffplug.spotless:spotless-maven-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | com.github.spotbugs:spotbugs-maven-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | com.openpojo:openpojo | — | indirect |
| Maven | de.rub.nds.tls.dockerlib:tls-docker-library | 3.2.2 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin | 7.8.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jxr-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-pmd-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.codehaus.mojo:flatten-maven-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.platform:junit-platform-launcher | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.mockito:mockito-core | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.mockito:mockito-junit-jupiter | — | indirect |
Dependency advisories 7
Installing maven:de.rub.nds.tls.attacker:utils@7.8.0 pulls in 45 packages, direct and transitive: 7 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct dependencies.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on | 1.81 | direct | high | 2 | 1.84 |
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core | 2.19.1 | indirect | high | 2 | 3.1.4 |
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.19.1 | indirect | high | 5 | 3.1.4 |
| org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on | 1.81 | direct | moderate | 1 | 1.84 |
| junit:junit | 4.10 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 4.13.1 |
| org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api | 2.25.1 | direct | low | 1 | 2.26.1 |
| org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core | 2.25.1 | direct | low | 4 | 2.25.4 |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.