Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 20:47 UTC

tradik / schema-resume

JSON Schema for CV/Resume parsing and validation. Self-hosted with JSON-LD, Schema.org integration, online validator, converter tools, and XML support.

JavaScript · XSLT · HTMLMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

tradik/schema-resume holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Tradik LimitedOrganization · verified domain
2 followers10 public repossince Nov 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/tradik/schema-resumev1.3.0-317 days ago—
PyPIschema-resume-validator1.3.0163317 days agojson-schemaresumecvcurriculum-vitaevalidationjson-ldparser
npmschema-resume-validator1.3.017022 days agojson-schemaresumecvcurriculum-vitaeparservalidationjson-ldschemavalidatorcareerprofessional
RubyGemsschema-resume-validator1.3.0-317 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 123 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year123
human_commit_share0.85
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~101.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv1.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release17
mean_days_between_releases101.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars8
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges10
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

42Weak
How it's scored
33.6/80Monthly downloads — 333 downloads/month across go, npm, pypi, rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/tradik/schema-resume, schema-resume-validator, schema-resume-validator, schema-resume-validator
dependents—
ecosystemsgo, npm, pypi, rubygems
total_downloads704
monthly_downloads333
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 33/36 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs33
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

73Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of tradik
19.6/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logintradik
public_repos10
account_age_days4,690

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on go, npm, pypi, rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
12/20Version history — 3 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/tradik/schema-resume, schema-resume-validator, schema-resume-validator, schema-resume-validator
ecosystemsgo, npm, pypi, rubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json, packages/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.black])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://schema-resume.org/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://schema-resume.org/
docs_sitehttps://schema-resume.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

57Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:schema-resume-validator@1.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 10 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://schema-resume.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 83 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://schema-resume.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.976
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json, packages/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.black])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 15 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspackages/golang/go.mod, packages/java/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.15

Code legibility for models

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 1/31 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes107,615
source_files_sampled31
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars
1contributors
123commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'ui-resume-editor' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'org.schema-resume:schema-resume-validator' from its registry
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'schema-resume/validator' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 20:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschemav1.2.0packages/golang/go.mod
Mavencom.networknt:json-schema-validator3.0.7packages/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.22.2packages/java/pom.xml
npmajv^8.12.0packages/npm/package.json
npmajv-formats^3.0.1packages/npm/package.json
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema^5.2 || ^6.0packages/php/composer.json
PyPIjsonschema>=4.17.0packages/python/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.28.0packages/python/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 198

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 190 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschemav1.2.0direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.22.2direct
Mavencom.networknt:json-schema-validator3.0.7direct
npmajv8.20.0direct
npmajv-formats3.0.1direct
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema—direct
PyPIjsonschema—direct
PyPIrequests—direct
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointerv0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreferencev0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.16.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter6.1.3indirect
npm@antfu/install-pkg1.1.0indirect
npm@braintree/sanitize-url7.1.2indirect
npm@chevrotain/types11.1.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@iconify/utils3.1.4indirect
npm@kurkle/color0.3.4indirect
npm@mermaid-js/parser1.2.1indirect
npm@tradik/xslt-processor1.0.3indirect
npm@types/d37.4.3indirect
npm@types/d3-array3.2.2indirect
npm@types/d3-axis3.0.6indirect
npm@types/d3-brush3.0.6indirect
npm@types/d3-chord3.0.6indirect
npm@types/d3-color3.1.3indirect
npm@types/d3-contour3.0.6indirect
npm@types/d3-delaunay6.0.4indirect
npm@types/d3-dispatch3.0.7indirect
npm@types/d3-drag3.0.7indirect
npm@types/d3-dsv3.0.7indirect
npm@types/d3-ease3.0.2indirect
npm@types/d3-fetch3.0.7indirect
npm@types/d3-force3.0.10indirect
npm@types/d3-format3.0.4indirect
npm@types/d3-geo3.1.1indirect
npm@types/d3-hierarchy3.1.7indirect
npm@types/d3-interpolate3.0.4indirect
npm@types/d3-path3.1.1indirect
npm@types/d3-polygon3.0.2indirect
npm@types/d3-quadtree3.0.6indirect
npm@types/d3-random3.0.4indirect
npm@types/d3-scale4.0.9indirect
npm@types/d3-scale-chromatic3.1.0indirect
npm@types/d3-selection3.0.11indirect
npm@types/d3-shape3.1.8indirect
npm@types/d3-time3.0.4indirect
npm@types/d3-time-format4.0.3indirect
npm@types/d3-timer3.0.2indirect
npm@types/d3-transition3.0.9indirect
npm@types/d3-zoom3.0.8indirect
npm@types/geojson7946.0.16indirect
npm@types/trusted-types2.0.7indirect
npm@upsetjs/venn.js2.0.0indirect
npmajv-cli5.0.0indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.18indirect
npmchart.js4.5.1indirect
npmcommander7.2.0indirect
npmcommander8.3.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcose-base1.0.3indirect
npmcose-base2.2.0indirect
npmcytoscape3.34.0indirect
npmcytoscape-cose-bilkent4.1.0indirect
npmcytoscape-fcose2.2.0indirect
npmd37.9.0indirect
npmd3-array2.12.1indirect
npmd3-array3.2.4indirect
npmd3-axis3.0.0indirect
npmd3-brush3.0.0indirect
npmd3-chord3.0.1indirect
npmd3-color3.1.0indirect
npmd3-contour4.0.2indirect
npmd3-delaunay6.0.4indirect
npmd3-dispatch3.0.1indirect
npmd3-drag3.0.0indirect
npmd3-dsv3.0.1indirect
npmd3-ease3.0.1indirect
npmd3-fetch3.0.1indirect
npmd3-force3.0.0indirect
npmd3-format3.1.2indirect
npmd3-geo3.1.1indirect
npmd3-hierarchy3.1.2indirect
npmd3-interpolate3.0.1indirect
npmd3-path1.0.9indirect
npmd3-path3.1.0indirect
npmd3-polygon3.0.1indirect
npmd3-quadtree3.0.1indirect
npmd3-random3.0.1indirect
npmd3-sankey0.12.3indirect
npmd3-scale4.0.2indirect
npmd3-scale-chromatic3.1.0indirect
npmd3-selection3.0.0indirect
npmd3-shape1.3.7indirect
npmd3-shape3.2.0indirect
npmd3-time3.1.0indirect
npmd3-time-format4.1.0indirect
npmd3-timer3.0.1indirect
npmd3-transition3.0.1indirect
npmd3-zoom3.0.0indirect
npmdagre-d3-es7.0.14indirect
npmdayjs1.11.21indirect
npmdelaunator5.1.0indirect
npmdompurify3.4.13indirect
npmes-toolkit1.50.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmeslint^10.9.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal2.0.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-patch2.2.1indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.6indirect
npmfastdom1.0.12indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmhachure-fill0.5.2indirect
npmiconv-lite0.6.3indirect
npmimport-meta-resolve4.2.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npminternmap1.0.1indirect
npminternmap2.0.3indirect
npmjs-yaml3.15.2indirect
npmjson-schema-migrate2.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmkatex0.16.47indirect
npmkhroma2.1.0indirect
npmlayout-base1.0.2indirect
npmlayout-base2.0.1indirect
npmlodash-es4.18.1indirect
npmlucide-static1.34.0indirect
npmmarked16.4.2indirect
npmmermaid11.17.2indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpackage-manager-detector1.8.0indirect
npmpath-data-parser0.1.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpoints-on-curve0.2.0indirect
npmpoints-on-path0.2.1indirect
npmprettier^3.2.4indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrobust-predicates3.0.3indirect
npmroughjs4.6.6indirect
npmrw1.3.3indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmschema-resume-validator1.3.0indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstrictdom1.0.1indirect
npmstylelint^17.14.1indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard^40.0.0indirect
npmstylis4.4.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmts-dedent2.3.0indirect
npmuuid14.0.1indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
PyPIblack—indirect
PyPIflake8—indirect
PyPIlxml—indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:schema-resume-validator@1.3.0 pulls in 10 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with tradik/schema-resume. Read them side by side →

90samchon/typiaSuper-fast/easy runtime validators and serializers via transformationExcellent91sourcemeta/jsonschemaThe CLI for working with JSON Schema. Covers formatting, linting, testing, bundling, and more for both local development and CI/CD pipelinesExcellent88readmeio/oasComprehensive tooling for working with OpenAPI definitions.Excellent88Blackcat-Informatics/purrdfPurRDF — one RDF 1.2 engine, one behavior, in Rust, Python, WebAssembly and C. Deterministic BM25 full-text search, exact GeoSPARQL 1.1 and embedding kNN answered from SPARQL, in-process, over one dataset: the three jobs a triple store usually kept PostgreSQL beside it for. Plus native codecs, RDFC-1.0, SHACL, ShEx, entailment and GTS transport.Excellent98aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-typescriptPowertools for AWS is a developer toolkit to implement Serverless best practices and increase developer velocity.Exceptional94python-jsonschema/jsonschemaAn implementation of the JSON Schema specification for PythonExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, PyPI, npm, RubyGems.