Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 23:36 UTC

traefik / hub

Traefik Hub Tutorials

Go · PythonApache-2.0★ 4 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

traefik/hub holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (72/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Traefik LabsOrganization
1,140 followers65 public repossince Sep 2015TraefikLabs

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume4 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~4.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.20.13
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases4.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars4 stars
8/25Forks10 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars4
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 45% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.448
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
23/30PR acceptance43/56 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs43
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
22/25Owner reach1,140 followers of traefik
25/25Track record65 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,140
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintraefik
public_repos65
account_age_days4,009

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

55Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://hub.traefik.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstraefik-hub, api, api-gateway, api-management, ingress, kubernetes, openapi, openapi3, swagger
has_wikino
homepagehttps://hub.traefik.io
docs_sitehttps://hub.traefik.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: github.com/go-chi/chi/v5 5.2.1 (moderate)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 442 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories150
affected_packages10
assessed_packages107
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 2, moderate 3, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 107 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history64 of 67 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.955
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, src/api-server/Makefile, tests/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 67
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, src/api-server/Makefile, tests/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/api-server/go.mod, tests/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes25,209
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)src/api-server/fixtures/openapi.yaml
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filessrc/api-server/fixtures/openapi.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

4GitHub stars
7contributors
4commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
46Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012024-062025-032026-01
Major 0Minor 1Patch 24

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 23:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests1 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patchv0.5.2src/api-server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.2.1src/api-server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/loadsv0.22.0src/api-server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0src/api-server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0src/api-server/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1src/api-server/go.mod
All dependencies 107

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 100 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch0.5.2direct
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v55.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/loads0.22.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.9.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1direct
Godario.cat/mergo1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/adalogics/go-fuzz-headers0.0.0-20230811130428-ced1acdcaa24indirect
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/govalidator0.0.0-20230301143203-a9d515a09cc2indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ansiterm0.0.0-20230124172434-306776ec8161indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v44.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/log0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/platforms0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/dockercfg0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/reference0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/docker27.3.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connections0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-units0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.12.1indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch/v55.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoop1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/fxamacker/cbor/v22.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdr1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-ole1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/analysis0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/errors0.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/spec0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/strfmt0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-models0.6.8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergo0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compress1.17.9indirect
Gogithub.com/kvtools/valkeyrie1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9stats0.0.0-20240909124753-873cd0166683indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/properties1.8.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorable0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winio0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/docker-image-spec1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/patternmatcher0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/sequential0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/user0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/userns0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/term0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/morikuni/aec1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/ulid1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digest1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-spec1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstat0.0.0-20240221224432-82ca36839d55indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/zerolog1.29.0indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v33.24.5indirect
Gogithub.com/shoenig/go-m1cpu0.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.3indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go0.33.0indirect
Gogithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go/modules/k3s0.33.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconf0.3.14indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpus0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/traefik/traefik/v33.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/x448/float160.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmi1.2.4indirect
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driver1.16.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp0.55.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel1.30.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric1.30.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace1.30.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.27.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.25.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.18.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.6.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.34.2indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gok8s.io/api0.31.0indirect
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.31.0indirect
Gok8s.io/client-go0.31.0indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.130.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20240812233141-91dab695df6findirect
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20240711033017-18e509b52bc8indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime0.19.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20221116044647-bc3834ca7abdindirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.4.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.4.0indirect
Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 107 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/traefik/traefik/v33.1.4indirectcritical733.7.10
golang.org/x/crypto0.27.0indirectcritical390.56.0
github.com/docker/docker27.3.0+incompatibleindirecthigh1028.0.0
golang.org/x/oauth20.22.0indirecthigh20.27.0
github.com/go-chi/chi/v55.2.1directmoderate55.3.0
go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver1.16.1indirectmoderate22.4.2
golang.org/x/net0.29.0indirectmoderate161.27.0-rc.3
github.com/klauspost/compress1.17.9indirectunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/sys0.25.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.18.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.