Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 20:37 UTC

typicode / husky

Git hooks made easy 🐶 woof!

JavaScriptMIT★ 35,250 stars⑂ 1,098 forkssince Jun 2014View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

typicode/husky holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (81/100) and lowest on Vitality (40/100). It was last updated 137 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

typicodePersonal account

10,215 followers77 public repossince Sep 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	husky	9.1.7	136,934,618	215	624 days ago	git hooks pre-commit

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

40Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

21At Risk

How it's scored

9.9/36	Push recency — last push 137 days ago
2.8/36	Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18	Commit volume — 7 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	7
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	137
active_weeks_last_year	4

Release discipline

68Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 80 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 624 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~32.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	80
latest_release_tag	v9.1.7
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	624
mean_days_between_releases	32.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

97Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 35,250 stars
25/25	Forks — 1,098 forks
12.1/15	Watchers — 152 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1,098
stars	35,250
watchers	152
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 136,934,618 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	husky
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	136,934,618
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.878

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good

How it's scored

38.9/42	Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
17.7/30	PR acceptance — 263/445 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	263
open_issues	82
closed_issues	1,032
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.926
closed_unmerged_prs	182
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

75Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25	Owner reach — 10,215 followers of typicode
25/25	Track record — 77 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	10,215
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	typicode
public_repos	77
account_age_days	4,701

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 624 days ago
20/20	Version history — 215 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	husky
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	624

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://typicode.github.io/husky
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	git, hooks, commit, pre-commit
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://typicode.github.io/husky
docs_site	https://typicode.github.io/husky
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 25 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	25
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	191
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 4, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 191 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

34At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.7/40	Legible commit history — 62 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.633
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

41Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/4 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	1,220
source_files_sampled	4
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

35,250GitHub stars

99contributors

7commits, last 12 months

137days since last push

80releases

1bus factor

82open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,098 ⇿

0Stars

1,098Forks

80Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 6Minor 7Patch 59

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10

4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 20:36 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	25 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 191

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 191 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-core	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-shared	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	@algolia/cache-browser-local-storage	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/cache-common	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/cache-in-memory	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-account	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-analytics	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-common	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-personalization	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-search	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/logger-common	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/logger-console	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/recommend	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-browser-xhr	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-common	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-node-http	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@algolia/transporter	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	@antfu/utils	`0.7.10`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.24.8`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/css	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/js	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/react	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-darwin-arm64	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-darwin-x64	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm64	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x64	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm64	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x64	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm64	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x64	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-arm	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-arm64	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-s390x	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-x64	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm64	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x64	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-wasm32	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-ia32	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-x64	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/core	`1.10.3`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/transformers	`1.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	@types/hast	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/linkify-it	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/markdown-it	`14.1.1`	indirect
npm	@types/mdurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/web-bluetooth	`0.0.20`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-api	`7.3.6`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-kit	`7.3.6`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-shared	`7.3.6`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/core	`10.11.0`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/integrations	`10.11.0`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/metadata	`10.11.0`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/shared	`10.11.0`	indirect
npm	algoliasearch	`4.23.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	birpc	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	boolbase	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	color-string	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	consola	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	copy-anything	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	css-select	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	css-what	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	datauri	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	defu	`6.1.4`	indirect
npm	destr	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	domutils	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	dotenv	`16.4.5`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	focus-trap	`7.5.4`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	hookable	`5.5.3`	indirect
npm	image-size	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-what	`4.1.16`	indirect
npm	jiti	`1.21.6`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.10`	indirect
npm	mark.js	`8.11.1`	indirect
npm	mimer	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	minisearch	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	mitt	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	node-fetch-native	`1.6.4`	indirect
npm	node-html-parser	`6.1.13`	indirect
npm	nth-check	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ofetch	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	perfect-debounce	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.39`	indirect
npm	preact	`10.20.1`	indirect
npm	queue	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	rfdc	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	search-insights	`2.13.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.6.3`	indirect
npm	sharp	`0.33.4`	indirect
npm	shiki	`1.10.3`	indirect
npm	simple-swizzle	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	speakingurl	`14.0.1`	indirect
npm	sponsorkit	`0.9.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	superjson	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	tabbable	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.6.3`	indirect
npm	ufo	`1.5.4`	indirect
npm	unconfig	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	vite	`5.3.4`	indirect
npm	vitepress	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.4.32`	indirect
npm	vue-demi	`0.14.8`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 191 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`4.18.1`	indirect	critical	2	`4.59.0`
defu	`6.1.4`	indirect	high	1	`6.1.5`
postcss	`8.4.39`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
sharp	`0.33.4`	indirect	high	1	`0.35.0`
vite	`5.3.4`	indirect	high	15	`8.0.16`
esbuild	`0.21.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.9`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records