Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-01 08:09 UTC

u9401066 / pubmed-search-mcp

MCP SDK v2 server for PubMed and multi-source biomedical research, with resilient search, full text, citations, and tenant-safe deployment.

PythonCustom license★ 28 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined
#entrez#evidence-based-medicine#literature-search#mcp#model-context-protocol#ncbi#pico#pubmed#python#systematic-review#citation-analysis#europe-pmc#fulltext#mcp-server#open-access#biomedical-research#multi-tenant#openalex#semantic-scholar#streamable-http

u9401066/pubmed-search-mcp holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Tz Ping GauPersonal account
43 followers43 public repossince Nov 2022Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan R.O.C

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpubmed-search-mcp0.7.52,422640 days agoentrezliteraturemcpmedicalmodel-context-protocolncbipubmedresearchsearch

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 440 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year440
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv0.7.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases15.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

31At Risk
How it's scored
23.2/60Stars — 28 stars
7.5/25Forks — 9 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars28
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

64Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
45.1/80Monthly downloads — 2,422 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespubmed-search-mcp
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,422
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

51Moderate
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 16/16 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs16
open_issues2
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d8
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.8/25Owner reach — 43 followers of u9401066
19.6/25Track record — 43 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers43
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginu9401066
public_repos43
account_age_days1,400
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespubmed-search-mcp
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://u9401066.github.io/pubmed-search-mcp/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsentrez, evidence-based-medicine, literature-search, mcp, model-context-protocol, ncbi, pico, pubmed, python, systematic-review, citation-analysis, europe-pmc, fulltext, mcp-server, open-access, biomedical-research, multi-tenant, openalex, semantic-scholar, streamable-http
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://u9401066.github.io/pubmed-search-mcp/
docs_sitehttps://u9401066.github.io/pubmed-search-mcp/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.6

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories29
affected_packages5
assessed_packages139
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 139 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.openclaw.ai/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.openclaw.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes28,432

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/pubmed_search/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/pubmed_search/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/pubmed_search/py.typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 7/479 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes844,361
source_files_sampled479
oversized_source_files7

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

28GitHub stars
1contributors
440commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
2open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:pubmed-search-mcp@0.7.5; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810912026-032026-052026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 5
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-01 08:09 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIapscheduler>=3.10.4,<4pyproject.toml
PyPIbiopython>=1.81,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIpylatexenc>=2.10pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=2.0,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.9,<5pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.128.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.10,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.2,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools>=5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.12pyproject.toml
PyPIpywin32>=311pyproject.toml
PyPIdefusedxml>=0.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPItoons>=0.5.4pyproject.toml
All dependencies 139

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 123 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanyio4.14.2direct
PyPIapscheduler3.11.3direct
PyPIbiopython1.88direct
PyPIcachetools7.1.7direct
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1direct
PyPIfastapi0.141.1direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPImcp2.0.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0direct
PyPIpylatexenc2.11direct
PyPIpywin32312direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIstarlette1.6.0direct
PyPItoons0.7.0direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.7.2indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackports-datetime-fromisoformat2.0.3indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcourlan1.4.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdateparser1.4.2indirect
PyPIdeptry0.25.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdparse0.6.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.5indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhtmldate1.10.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.10.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.10.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.4indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjustext3.0.2indirect
PyPIlibcst1.9.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIlinkify-it-py2.1.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPIlxml-html-clean0.4.5indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImarshmallow4.3.1indirect
PyPImcp-types2.0.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImutmut3.7.0indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInltk3.10.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.3indirect
PyPIplaywright1.62.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpubmed-search-mcp0.7.5indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.2.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.5.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.2indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpytz2026.3.post1indirect
PyPIpyyaml-ft8.0.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequirements-parser0.13.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIruff0.14.14indirect
PyPIsafety3.8.1indirect
PyPIsafety-schemas0.0.16indirect
PyPIsetproctitle1.3.7indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.8indirect
PyPIstevedore5.8.0indirect
PyPIstevedore5.9.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItextual8.2.8indirect
PyPItld0.13.2indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItrafilatura2.2.0indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItyper0.25.1indirect
PyPItypes-cachetools7.0.0.20260713indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260815indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260712indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPItzlocal5.4.4indirect
PyPIuc-micro-py2.0.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.3indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.4indirect
PyPIvulture2.16indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 139 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pyjwt2.13.0indirectcritical132.15.0
httpx22.10.0indirecthigh62.12.0
nltk3.10.3indirecthigh1—
urllib32.7.0indirecthigh32.8.0
virtualenv21.7.4indirecthigh621.7.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with u9401066/pubmed-search-mcp. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional98modelcontextprotocol/python-sdkThe official Python SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clientsExceptional97redis/redis-vl-pythonRedis Vector Library (RedisVL) -- the AI-native Python client for Redis.Exceptional98deepnote/deepnoteDeepnote is a drop-in replacement for Jupyter with an AI-first design, sleek UI, new blocks, and native data integrations. Use Python, R, and SQL locally in your favorite IDE, then scale to Deepnote cloud for real-time collaboration, Deepnote agent, and deployable data apps. https://deepnote.com/Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.