Public record
Software health reportschema 0.13.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 15:25 UTC

vasilistotskas / grooveshop-django-api

Django Ecommerce

PythonCustom license★ 8 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#admin-dashboard#authentication#authorization#django#django-rest-framework

vasilistotskas/grooveshop-django-api holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Vasilis TotskasPersonal account
31 followers12 public repossince Jan 2020Advisable

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIgrooveshop-django-api1.156.72,7984940 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 910 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year910
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.156.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars8
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46/80Monthly downloads — 2,798 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgrooveshop-django-api
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,798
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

19Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.927

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 10/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.8/25Owner reach — 31 followers of vasilistotskas
20.1/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers31
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginvasilistotskas
public_repos12
account_age_days2,364
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 494 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgrooveshop-django-api
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

94Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsadmin-dashboard, authentication, authorization, django, django-rest-framework
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,775
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 11/1,299 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes124,340
source_files_sampled1,299
oversized_source_files11

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

8GitHub stars
4contributors
910commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 15:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 56
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIasgiref==3.11.1pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3==1.43.46pyproject.toml
PyPIcharset_normalizer==3.4.9pyproject.toml
PyPIchannels==4.3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIchannels-redis==4.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography==49.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango==6.0.7pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-admin-thumbnails==1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-allauth==65.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-extra-settings==0.14.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-celery-beat==2.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-celery-results==2.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-cors-headers==4.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-simple-history==3.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-filter==26.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-unfold==0.100.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-money==3.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-mptt==0.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-parler==2.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-parler-rest==2.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-phonenumber-field==8.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-rosetta==0.10.3pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-rest-knox==5.0.4pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-storages==1.14.6pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-tinymce==5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework==3.17.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework-camel-case==1.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-spectacular==0.30.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfido2==2.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIflower==2.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIgunicorn==26.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIimportlib-resources==6.5.2pyproject.toml
PyPImeasurement==3.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPImeilisearch==0.42.0pyproject.toml
PyPIphonenumbers==9.0.34pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow==12.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg== 3.3.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv==1.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIqrcode==8.2pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3==2.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn==0.51.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcelery>=5.6.3,<6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdisposable-email-domains==0.0.218pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-stubs-ext==6.0.6pyproject.toml
PyPItwisted==26.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdj-stripe==2.11.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdefusedxml>=0.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPInh3>=0.3.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt==2.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIweasyprint>=69.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests==2.34.2pyproject.toml
PyPIxmlschema==4.3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIargon2-cffi>=25.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfacebook-business==25.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn-worker>=0.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=16.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with vasilistotskas/grooveshop-django-api. Read them side by side →

95supabase/supabase-pyPython Client for Supabase. Query Postgres from Flask, Django, FastAPI. Python user authentication, security policies, edge functions, file storage, and realtime data streaming. Good first issue.Exceptional94django-hijack/django-hijackWith Django Hijack, admins can log in and work on behalf of other users without having to know their credentials.Exceptional90goauthentik/authentikThe authentication glue you need.Excellent96django-guardian/django-guardianPer object permissions for DjangoExceptional96auth0/auth0.jsAuth0 headless browser sdkExceptional96ansible/awxAWX provides a web-based user interface, REST API, and task engine built on top of Ansible. It is one of the upstream projects for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.13.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.