Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 08:03 UTC

vgmello / momentum

Momentum.Net - Start Building

C#MIT★ 3 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jul 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

vgmello/momentum holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Vitor MPersonal account
2 followers20 public repossince Jun 2013@ellosoft

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmdocs0.4.04,0901340 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume106 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year106
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year16

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagtemplate-v0.0.12-preview.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars3 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 49% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.486
How it's scored
37.8/42Issue resolution90% of issues closed
12.7/30PR acceptance115/272 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs115
open_issues1
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.9
closed_unmerged_prs157
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach2 followers of vgmello
21.6/25Track record20 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginvgmello
public_repos20
account_age_days4,772
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history13 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdocs
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://momentumlib.net/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscsharp, dotnet, dotnet-template, microservice, mmt, momentum
has_wikino
homepagehttps://momentumlib.net/
docs_sitehttps://momentumlib.net/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.claude_project/CLAUDE.md, CLAUDE.md, libs/Momentum/CLAUDE.md, libs/Momentum/docs/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.claude_project/CLAUDE.md, CLAUDE.md, libs/Momentum/CLAUDE.md, libs/Momentum/docs/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes15,773
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingdocs/tsconfig.json, libs/Momentum/docs/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsdocs/tsconfig.json, libs/Momentum/docs/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/374 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes33,576
source_files_sampled374
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)src/AppDomain.Api/Cashiers/Protos/Models/cashier.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Cashiers/Protos/cashiers.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Common/Protos/decimal.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Invoices/Protos/Models/invoice.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Invoices/Protos/invoices.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/OpenApi/openapi.json, tests/performance/k6/protos/cashiers.proto
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filessrc/AppDomain.Api/Cashiers/Protos/Models/cashier.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Cashiers/Protos/cashiers.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Common/Protos/decimal.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Invoices/Protos/Models/invoice.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/Invoices/Protos/invoices.proto, src/AppDomain.Api/OpenApi/openapi.json, tests/performance/k6/protos/cashiers.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3GitHub stars
3contributors
106commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
1open issues
npm, NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 08:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmglob^13.0.6docs/package.json
npmgray-matter^4.0.3docs/package.json
npmyaml^2.8.1docs/package.json
All dependencies 100

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmglob^13.0.6direct
npmgray-matter^4.0.3direct
npmyaml^2.8.1direct
npm@faker-js/faker^8.4.1indirect
npm@mermaid-js/layout-elk^0.2.1indirect
npm@types/bun^1.2.14indirect
npm@types/node^26.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it^14.1.0indirect
npmmermaid^11.16.0indirect
npmvitepress^1.6.4indirect
NuGetAsp.Versioning.Httpindirect
NuGetAspire.Azure.Data.Tablesindirect
NuGetAspire.Azure.Storage.Blobsindirect
NuGetAspire.Confluent.Kafkaindirect
NuGetAspire.Hosting.AppHostindirect
NuGetAspire.Hosting.Azure.Storageindirect
NuGetAspire.Hosting.Kafkaindirect
NuGetAspire.Hosting.Orleansindirect
NuGetAspire.Hosting.PostgreSQLindirect
NuGetAspire.Npgsqlindirect
NuGetBogusindirect
NuGetCloudNative.CloudEvents.Kafkaindirect
NuGetCloudNative.CloudEvents.SystemTextJsonindirect
NuGetcoverlet.collectorindirect
NuGetDapperindirect
NuGetFluentValidationindirect
NuGetFluentValidation.DependencyInjectionExtensionsindirect
NuGetFluid.Coreindirect
NuGetGoogle.Protobufindirect
NuGetGrpc.AspNetCoreindirect
NuGetGrpc.AspNetCore.Server.Reflectionindirect
NuGetGrpc.AspNetCore.Webindirect
NuGetGrpc.Net.Clientindirect
NuGetGrpc.Toolsindirect
NuGetlinq2dbindirect
NuGetlinq2db.Extensionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApiindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHostindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzersindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Commonindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.ApiDescription.Serverindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configurationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binderindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.CommandLineindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariablesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Jsonindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hostingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http.Resilienceindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.ServiceDiscoveryindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Analyzersindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Clientindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Clustering.AzureStorageindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Core.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Dashboardindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.GrainDirectory.AzureStorageindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Persistence.AzureStorageindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Reminders.AzureStorageindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Serverindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.TestingHostindirect
NuGetMomentum.Extensionsindirect
NuGetMomentum.Extensions.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMomentum.Extensions.Messaging.Kafkaindirect
NuGetMomentum.Extensions.SourceGeneratorsindirect
NuGetMomentum.ServiceDefaultsindirect
NuGetMomentum.ServiceDefaults.Apiindirect
NuGetNetArchTest.Rulesindirect
NuGetNpgsqlindirect
NuGetNSubstituteindirect
NuGetOneOfindirect
NuGetOneOf.SourceGeneratorindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocolindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hostingindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCoreindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.GrpcCoreindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.GrpcNetClientindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Httpindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Runtimeindirect
NuGetRefit.HttpClientFactoryindirect
NuGetRefitter.MSBuildindirect
NuGetRiok.Mapperlyindirect
NuGetScalar.AspNetCoreindirect
NuGetSerilog.AspNetCoreindirect
NuGetSerilog.Exceptionsindirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.OpenTelemetryindirect
NuGetShouldlyindirect
NuGetSpectre.Console.Cliindirect
NuGetTestcontainersindirect
NuGetTestcontainers.Kafkaindirect
NuGetTestcontainers.PostgreSqlindirect
NuGetWolverineFxindirect
NuGetWolverineFx.Kafkaindirect
NuGetWolverineFx.Postgresqlindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioindirect
NuGetxunit.v3indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.