Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 23:18 UTC

vierisid / jarvis

TypeScript · GoCustom license★ 659 stars⑂ 184 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolWeb interfaceChat bothow this is determined

vierisid/jarvis holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Security (48/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

vierisidPersonal account
36 followers2 public repossince Aug 2024

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@usejarvis/brain0.13.71,921403 days agojarvisaidaemonassistantcli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 379 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year379
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year29
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 45 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_taginstaller-v0.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases0.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.7/60Stars — 659 stars
18.9/25Forks — 184 forks
6.2/15Watchers — 14 watchers
Inputs used
forks184
stars659
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
43.8/80Monthly downloads — 1,921 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@usejarvis/brain
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,921
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 66% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.66
How it's scored
37.5/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 335/396 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs335
open_issues4
closed_issues33
prs_merged_7d33
prs_decided_7d34
prs_merged_30d48
prs_decided_30d50
issue_closed_ratio0.892
closed_unmerged_prs61
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.3/25Owner reach — 36 followers of vierisid
7.7/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers36
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginvierisid
public_repos2
account_age_days772
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 40 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@usejarvis/brain
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 24 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.usejarvis.dev/
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.usejarvis.dev/
docs_sitehttps://www.usejarvis.dev/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 24 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 70 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages252
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@usejarvis/brain@0.13.7 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 252 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.8/40Legible commit history — 61 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.709
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — sidecar/Makefile, src/sites/fixtures/security-test-site/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checking — src/sites/fixtures/security-test-site/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/common/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/approval/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/delay/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/file-helper/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/http/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/schedule/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/store/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/webhook/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/framework/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/server/engine/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/shared/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/web/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filessidecar/Makefile, src/sites/fixtures/security-test-site/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/sites/fixtures/security-test-site/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/common/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/approval/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/delay/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/file-helper/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/http/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/schedule/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/store/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/core/webhook/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/pieces/framework/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/server/engine/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/shared/tsconfig.json, src/workflows/activepieces/packages/web/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssidecar/go.mod, sidecar/third_party/webview_go/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 10/2,217 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes287,534
source_files_sampled2,217
oversized_source_files10
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofchat-bot
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

659GitHub stars
9contributors
379commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
45releases
1bus factor
4open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/jarvis/sidecar' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 184 ⇿
0Stars
184Forks
45Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020018072026-032026-062026-09
Major 0Minor 13Patch 28
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 23:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests24 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities70 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 39
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@codemirror/autocomplete^6.20.1package.json
npm@codemirror/commands^6.10.3package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-css^6.3.1package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-html^6.4.11package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-javascript^6.2.5package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-json^6.0.2package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-markdown^6.5.0package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-python^6.2.1package.json
npm@codemirror/language^6.12.2package.json
npm@codemirror/state^6.6.0package.json
npm@codemirror/theme-one-dark^6.1.3package.json
npm@codemirror/view^6.40.0package.json
npm@types/react^19.2.14package.json
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.3package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.10.1package.json
npmdiscord.js^14.25.1package.json
npmedge-tts-universal^1.4.0package.json
npmfuse.js^7.3.0package.json
npmjose^6.2.0package.json
npmlucide-react^1.9.0package.json
npmnanoid^5.1.11package.json
npmonnxruntime-web^1.20.1package.json
npmopenwakeword-wasm-browser^0.1.1package.json
npmreact^19.2.4package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.4package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1package.json
npmsocket.io^4.8.3package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.2.1package.json
npmyaml^2.7.0package.json
Gogithub.com/gen2brain/malgov0.11.24sidecar/go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.3.0sidecar/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0sidecar/go.mod
Gogithub.com/hajimehoshi/go-mp3v0.3.4sidecar/go.mod
Gogithub.com/webview/webview_gov0.0.0-20240831120633-6173450d4dd6sidecar/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.39.0sidecar/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0sidecar/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1sidecar/go.mod
Gonhooyr.io/websocketv1.8.17sidecar/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@usejarvis/brain@0.13.7 pulls in 252 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.