Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 07:27 UTC

vilicvane / extendable-error

A simple extendable error class that extends Error.

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 8 stars⑂ 1 forksince Dec 2015View on GitHub ↗

vilicvane/extendable-error holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (41/100) and lowest on Vitality (13/100). It was last updated 1221 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 25 is calibrated to 19 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

vilicvanePersonal account
507 followers191 public repossince Aug 2011Enverse

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmextendable-errorpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.714,872,95082252 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 1,221 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1,221
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,252 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.1.7
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,252
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

19Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars8
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

25At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
19.5/25Owner reach507 followers of vilicvane
25/25Track record191 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers507
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginvilicvane
public_repos191
account_age_days5,515
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

29At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate1.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories27
affected_packages16
assessed_packages142
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 4, high 8, moderate 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 142 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history0 of 22 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 22
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes3,274
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,221days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package 'extendable-error' points at a different repository (https://github.com/vilic/extendable-error); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.1 / 10
1.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 07:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 142

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 142 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@types/chai3.5.2indirect
npm@types/mocha2.2.48indirect
npm@types/node7.10.11indirect
npmansi-align2.0.0indirect
npmansi-regex2.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex3.0.0indirect
npmansi-styles2.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmbabel-code-frame6.26.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.0indirect
npmboxen1.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.0indirect
npmcamelcase4.1.0indirect
npmcapture-stack-trace1.0.1indirect
npmchai3.5.0indirect
npmchalk1.1.3indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmci-info1.6.0indirect
npmcli-boxes1.0.0indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcolors1.4.0indirect
npmcommander2.9.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconfigstore3.1.2indirect
npmcreate-error-class3.0.2indirect
npmcross-spawn5.1.0indirect
npmcrypto-random-string1.0.0indirect
npmdebug2.6.8indirect
npmdeep-eql0.1.3indirect
npmdeep-extend0.6.0indirect
npmdiff3.2.0indirect
npmdiff3.5.0indirect
npmdot-prop4.2.0indirect
npmduplexer30.1.4indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmexeca0.7.0indirect
npmfindup-sync0.3.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmget-stream3.0.0indirect
npmglob5.0.15indirect
npmglob7.1.1indirect
npmglob7.1.6indirect
npmglobal-dirs0.1.1indirect
npmgot6.7.1indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.4indirect
npmgraceful-readlink1.0.1indirect
npmgrowl1.9.2indirect
npmhas-ansi2.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag1.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhe1.1.1indirect
npmimport-lazy2.1.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmini1.3.5indirect
npmis-ci1.2.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point2.0.0indirect
npmis-installed-globally0.1.0indirect
npmis-npm1.0.0indirect
npmis-obj1.0.1indirect
npmis-path-inside1.0.1indirect
npmis-redirect1.0.0indirect
npmis-retry-allowed1.2.0indirect
npmis-stream1.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens3.0.2indirect
npmjson33.3.2indirect
npmlatest-version3.1.0indirect
npmlodash._baseassign3.2.0indirect
npmlodash._basecopy3.0.1indirect
npmlodash._basecreate3.0.3indirect
npmlodash._getnative3.9.1indirect
npmlodash._isiterateecall3.0.9indirect
npmlodash.create3.1.1indirect
npmlodash.isarguments3.1.0indirect
npmlodash.isarray3.0.4indirect
npmlodash.keys3.1.2indirect
npmlowercase-keys1.0.1indirect
npmlru-cache4.1.5indirect
npmmake-dir1.3.0indirect
npmminimatch3.0.4indirect
npmminimist0.0.10indirect
npmminimist0.0.8indirect
npmminimist1.2.5indirect
npmmkdirp0.5.1indirect
npmmocha3.5.3indirect
npmms2.0.0indirect
npmnpm-run-path2.0.2indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptimist0.6.1indirect
npmp-finally1.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json4.0.1indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-is-inside1.0.2indirect
npmpath-key2.0.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.6indirect
npmpify3.0.0indirect
npmprepend-http1.0.4indirect
npmpseudomap1.0.2indirect
npmrc1.2.8indirect
npmregistry-auth-token3.4.0indirect
npmregistry-url3.1.0indirect
npmresolve1.17.0indirect
npmrimraf2.7.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver5.7.1indirect
npmsemver-diff2.1.0indirect
npmshebang-command1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-regex1.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.3indirect
npmstring-width2.1.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi3.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi4.0.0indirect
npmstrip-eof1.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments2.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color2.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color3.1.2indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmterm-size1.2.0indirect
npmtimed-out4.0.1indirect
npmtslint4.5.1indirect
npmtsutils1.9.1indirect
npmtype-detect0.1.1indirect
npmtype-detect1.0.0indirect
npmtypescript2.9.2indirect
npmunique-string1.0.0indirect
npmunzip-response2.0.1indirect
npmupdate-notifier2.5.0indirect
npmurl-parse-lax1.0.0indirect
npmvts0.1.2indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmwidest-line2.0.1indirect
npmwordwrap0.0.3indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmwrite-file-atomic2.4.3indirect
npmxdg-basedir3.0.0indirect
npmyallist2.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 16

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 142 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 16 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
growl1.9.2indirectcritical11.10.0
minimist0.0.10indirectcritical21.2.6
minimist0.0.8indirectcritical21.2.6
minimist1.2.5indirectcritical11.2.6
ansi-regex3.0.0indirecthigh16.0.1
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
cross-spawn5.1.0indirecthigh17.0.5
debug2.6.8indirecthigh24.3.1
dot-prop4.2.0indirecthigh15.1.1
ini1.3.5indirecthigh11.3.6
minimatch3.0.4indirecthigh410.2.3
semver5.7.1indirecthigh17.5.2
diff3.2.0indirectmoderate28.0.3
diff3.5.0indirectmoderate18.0.3
got6.7.1indirectmoderate112.1.0
path-parse1.0.6indirectmoderate11.0.7

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.