Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 05:11 UTC

vprusso / toqito

|toqito> (Theory of Quantum Information Toolkit) is a Python library for research in quantum information theory.

PythonMIT★ 287 stars⑂ 165 forkssince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗

vprusso/toqito holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Vincent RussoPersonal account
798 followers79 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume808 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year808
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases20 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~62.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv1.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases62.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.8/60Stars287 stars
18.5/25Forks165 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks165
stars287
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 58% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth79 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled79
top_contributor_share0.584
How it's scored
41.9/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance1,117/1,277 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 20/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs1,117
open_issues2
closed_issues588
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.997
closed_unmerged_prs160
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
20.9/25Owner reach798 followers of vprusso
25/25Track record79 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers798
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginvprusso
public_repos79
account_age_days5,230
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history26 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestoqito
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://vprusso.github.io/toqito/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsquantum-computing, python, quantum-information, matrix-analysis, python-3, physics, quantum, convex-optimization, linear-algebra, quantum-information-science, quantum-information-theory, quantum-physics, quantum-programming, research, nonlocal-game, semidefinite-programming, entanglement, quantum-channels, quantum-measurements, quantum-states
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://vprusso.github.io/toqito/
docs_sitehttps://vprusso.github.io/toqito/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 20/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
54.8/55Manageable file sizes2/555 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes71,898
source_files_sampled555
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

287GitHub stars
79contributors
808commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
2open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 05:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 20/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIcvxpy>=1.9.0,<2pyproject.toml
PyPImore-itertools>=11.1.0,<12pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.4.1,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.17.1,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIscs>=3.2.11,<4pyproject.toml
PyPIpicos>=2.6.2pyproject.toml
PyPInetworkx>=3.4,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib>=3.11.0,<4pyproject.toml
All dependencies 136

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 128 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcvxpy1.9.0direct
PyPImatplotlib3.11.0direct
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0direct
PyPInetworkx3.5direct
PyPInumpy2.4.1direct
PyPIpicos2.6.2direct
PyPIscipy1.17.1direct
PyPIscs3.2.11direct
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.17.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs6.1indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.2indirect
PyPIbleach6.4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.8.3indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.3indirect
PyPIclarabel0.11.1indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.0indirect
PyPIcvxopt1.3.3indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.17indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.3indirect
PyPIfonttools4.60.2indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgriffe1.15.0indirect
PyPIhighspy1.13.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.14indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIipykernel6.30.1indirect
PyPIipython9.15.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.2indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.8.1indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupytext1.19.1indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.9indirect
PyPIlatexcodec3.0.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-exec1.12.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.1.7indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImike2.1.4indirect
PyPImistune3.3.0indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-api-autonav0.4.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-bibtex4.4.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-gallery0.10.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-jupyter0.25.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.2indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.1indirect
PyPImosek11.2.2indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.2indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.1indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.9.1indirect
PyPIosqp1.0.4indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.2.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.3.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpsutil7.1.0indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpybtex0.25.1indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpygments-ansi-color0.3.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.21.3indirect
PyPIpypandoc1.16.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.2.5indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIqdldl0.1.9.post1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.2indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIresponses0.25.8indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.27.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.9.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsparsediffpy0.3.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPItinycss21.4.0indirect
PyPItoqito1.2.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.7indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPIty0.0.12indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvalidators0.35.0indirect
PyPIverspec0.1.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.36.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.14indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.