Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:01 UTC

w8r / splay-tree

Fast splay-tree data structure

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 122 stars⑂ 19 forkssince Sep 2017View on GitHub ↗

#binary-search-tree #splay-trees #data-structures #algorithms #performance #tree

w8r/splay-tree holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (70/100) and lowest on Vitality (36/100). It was last updated 126 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Alexander MilevskiPersonal account

390 followers163 public repossince Sep 2008@Linkurious

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	splaytree	3.2.3	12,020,981	19	295 days ago	binary-tree bst splay-tree splay balanced-search-tree

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

19Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 295 daysautomated commits excludedissues left unansweredOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedcontinuous integration broken

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

9.9/36	Push recency — last push 126 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18	Commit volume — 7 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	7
human_commit_share	0.635
days_since_last_push	126
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

62Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 5 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 295 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~245.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	5
latest_release_tag	v3.2.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	295
mean_days_between_releases	245.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

46Weak

How it's scored

33.8/60	Stars — 122 stars
10.5/25	Forks — 19 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	19
stars	122
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 12,020,981 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	splaytree
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	12,020,981
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
6.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	5
top_contributor_share	0.897

Issue & PR responsiveness

59Moderate

How it's scored

21/42	Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
26.9/30	PR acceptance — 35/39 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	35
open_issues	5
closed_issues	5
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.5
closed_unmerged_prs	4
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.6/25	Owner reach — 390 followers of w8r
25/25	Track record — 163 public repos, account ~18 yr old

Inputs used

followers	390
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	w8r
public_repos	163
account_age_days	6,592

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 295 days ago
20/20	Version history — 19 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	splaytree
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	295

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
2/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://npm.runkit.com/splaytree
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	binary-search-tree, splay-trees, data-structures, algorithms, performance, tree
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://npm.runkit.com/splaytree
docs_site	https://npm.runkit.com/splaytree
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

30At Risk

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

2 contributor organization profilesRussia

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	75
security_posture_after_multiplier	30
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	40

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	38
affected_packages	16
assessed_packages	201
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 10, moderate 5
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 201 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

13Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
13.3/40	Legible commit history — 10 of 40 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.25
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
6.3/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 63 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 23 of the last 63 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.032
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.365

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/21 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	15,628
source_files_sampled	21
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

122GitHub stars

5contributors

7commits, last 12 months

126days since last push

5releases

1bus factor

5open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿

0Stars

19Forks

5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 1Patch 4

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 10:00 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1	CI-Tests	3 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 3/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
4	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	33 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 201 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@bcoe/v8-coverage	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/balanced-match	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/brace-expansion	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/api-extractor	`7.55.2`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/api-extractor-model	`7.32.2`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/tsdoc	`0.16.0`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/tsdoc-config	`0.18.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/darwin-arm64	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/darwin-x64	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/linux-arm64-gnu	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/linux-arm64-musl	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/linux-x64-gnu	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/linux-x64-musl	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/win32-arm64	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@oxlint/win32-x64	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/pluginutils	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/node-core-library	`5.19.1`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/problem-matcher	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/rig-package	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/terminal	`0.19.5`	indirect
npm	@rushstack/ts-command-line	`5.1.5`	indirect
npm	@standard-schema/spec	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/argparse	`1.0.38`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@vitest/coverage-v8	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	@volar/language-core	`2.4.27`	indirect
npm	@volar/source-map	`2.4.27`	indirect
npm	@volar/typescript	`2.4.27`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.26`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.26`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-vue2	`2.7.16`	indirect
npm	@vue/language-core	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.26`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.12.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.13.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-draft-04	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	alien-signals	`0.4.14`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	ast-v8-to-istanbul	`0.3.10`	indirect
npm	avl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	bintrees	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	chai	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	compare-versions	`6.1.1`	indirect
npm	confbox	`0.1.8`	indirect
npm	confbox	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	de-indent	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	diff	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	entities	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	exsolve	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`11.3.3`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	html-escaper	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	import-lazy	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-coverage	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-report	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-source-maps	`5.0.6`	indirect
npm	istanbul-reports	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	jju	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	kolorist	`1.8.0`	indirect
npm	local-pkg	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.23`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	magicast	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.0.3`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	mlly	`1.8.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	muggle-string	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect
npm	obug	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	oxlint	`1.35.0`	indirect
npm	path-browserify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	pkg-types	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	pkg-types	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	quansync	`0.2.11`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.11`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.59.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.5.4`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.10.0`	indirect
npm	string-argv	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.15`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.8.2`	indirect
npm	ufo	`1.6.1`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-dts	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	vitest	`4.0.16`	indirect
npm	vscode-uri	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 16

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 201 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 16 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
vitest	`4.0.16`	indirect	critical	2	`5.0.0-rc.2`
@isaacs/brace-expansion	`5.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`5.0.1`
brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect	high	7	`5.0.12`
lodash	`4.17.23`	indirect	high	2	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`10.0.3`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`9.0.5`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect	high	3	`5.1.16`
picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect	high	1	`1.2.2`
vite	`7.3.0`	indirect	high	5	`8.0.16`
@vitest/mocker	`4.0.16`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.0-rc.2`
ajv	`8.12.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
ajv	`8.13.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
diff	`8.0.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.3`
sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect	moderate	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records