Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-31 03:55 UTC

webc-site / webc.site

JavaScript · StylusNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

webc-site/webc.site holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (61/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (25/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

38
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

38
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WebC.siteOrganization
4 followers10 public repossince May 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmwebc.site0.2.414,996678 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

61Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

43Weak
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume — 4 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 15 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv0.2.41
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

25At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

62Moderate
How it's scored
49.3/80Monthly downloads — 4,996 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageswebc.site
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,996
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

34At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

43Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of webc-site
8/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginwebc-site
public_repos10
account_age_days71

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 67 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageswebc.site
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

26At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

26At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): ci_tests, packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — skills/af/AGENTS.md, skills/ar/AGENTS.md, skills/as/AGENTS.md, skills/az/AGENTS.md, skills/be/AGENTS.md, skills/bg/AGENTS.md, skills/bn/AGENTS.md, skills/bs/AGENTS.md, skills/ca/AGENTS.md, skills/ceb/AGENTS.md, skills/cs/AGENTS.md, skills/cy/AGENTS.md, skills/da/AGENTS.md, skills/de/AGENTS.md, skills/el/AGENTS.md, skills/en/AGENTS.md, skills/es/AGENTS.md, skills/et/AGENTS.md, skills/eu/AGENTS.md, skills/fa/AGENTS.md, skills/fi/AGENTS.md, skills/fil/AGENTS.md, skills/fr/AGENTS.md, skills/gl/AGENTS.md, skills/gu/AGENTS.md, skills/hi/AGENTS.md, skills/hr/AGENTS.md, skills/hu/AGENTS.md, skills/hy/AGENTS.md, skills/id/AGENTS.md, skills/is/AGENTS.md, skills/it/AGENTS.md, skills/iw/AGENTS.md, skills/ja/AGENTS.md, skills/jv/AGENTS.md, skills/ka/AGENTS.md, skills/kk/AGENTS.md, skills/km/AGENTS.md, skills/kn/AGENTS.md, skills/ko/AGENTS.md, skills/lb/AGENTS.md, skills/lo/AGENTS.md, skills/lt/AGENTS.md, skills/lv/AGENTS.md, skills/mk/AGENTS.md, skills/mr/AGENTS.md, skills/ms/AGENTS.md, skills/mt/AGENTS.md, skills/my/AGENTS.md, skills/ne/AGENTS.md, skills/nl/AGENTS.md, skills/no/AGENTS.md, skills/or/AGENTS.md, skills/pl/AGENTS.md, skills/pt/AGENTS.md, skills/ro/AGENTS.md, skills/ru/AGENTS.md, skills/sd/AGENTS.md, skills/si/AGENTS.md, skills/sk/AGENTS.md, skills/sl/AGENTS.md, skills/sq/AGENTS.md, skills/sr/AGENTS.md, skills/sv/AGENTS.md, skills/sw/AGENTS.md, skills/ta/AGENTS.md, skills/te/AGENTS.md, skills/th/AGENTS.md, skills/tr/AGENTS.md, skills/uk/AGENTS.md, skills/ur/AGENTS.md, skills/uz/AGENTS.md, skills/vi/AGENTS.md, skills/zh-TW/AGENTS.md, skills/zh/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesskills/af/AGENTS.md, skills/ar/AGENTS.md, skills/as/AGENTS.md, skills/az/AGENTS.md, skills/be/AGENTS.md, skills/bg/AGENTS.md, skills/bn/AGENTS.md, skills/bs/AGENTS.md, skills/ca/AGENTS.md, skills/ceb/AGENTS.md, skills/cs/AGENTS.md, skills/cy/AGENTS.md, skills/da/AGENTS.md, skills/de/AGENTS.md, skills/el/AGENTS.md, skills/en/AGENTS.md, skills/es/AGENTS.md, skills/et/AGENTS.md, skills/eu/AGENTS.md, skills/fa/AGENTS.md, skills/fi/AGENTS.md, skills/fil/AGENTS.md, skills/fr/AGENTS.md, skills/gl/AGENTS.md, skills/gu/AGENTS.md, skills/hi/AGENTS.md, skills/hr/AGENTS.md, skills/hu/AGENTS.md, skills/hy/AGENTS.md, skills/id/AGENTS.md, skills/is/AGENTS.md, skills/it/AGENTS.md, skills/iw/AGENTS.md, skills/ja/AGENTS.md, skills/jv/AGENTS.md, skills/ka/AGENTS.md, skills/kk/AGENTS.md, skills/km/AGENTS.md, skills/kn/AGENTS.md, skills/ko/AGENTS.md, skills/lb/AGENTS.md, skills/lo/AGENTS.md, skills/lt/AGENTS.md, skills/lv/AGENTS.md, skills/mk/AGENTS.md, skills/mr/AGENTS.md, skills/ms/AGENTS.md, skills/mt/AGENTS.md, skills/my/AGENTS.md, skills/ne/AGENTS.md, skills/nl/AGENTS.md, skills/no/AGENTS.md, skills/or/AGENTS.md, skills/pl/AGENTS.md, skills/pt/AGENTS.md, skills/ro/AGENTS.md, skills/ru/AGENTS.md, skills/sd/AGENTS.md, skills/si/AGENTS.md, skills/sk/AGENTS.md, skills/sl/AGENTS.md, skills/sq/AGENTS.md, skills/sr/AGENTS.md, skills/sv/AGENTS.md, skills/sw/AGENTS.md, skills/ta/AGENTS.md, skills/te/AGENTS.md, skills/th/AGENTS.md, skills/tr/AGENTS.md, skills/uk/AGENTS.md, skills/ur/AGENTS.md, skills/uz/AGENTS.md, skills/vi/AGENTS.md, skills/zh-TW/AGENTS.md, skills/zh/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,755
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/187 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes42,781
source_files_sampled187
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
4commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-31 03:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with webc-site/webc.site. Read them side by side →

100dotnet/aspnetcoreASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100streamlit/streamlitStreamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.Exceptional100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional99argoproj/argo-workflowsWorkflow Engine for KubernetesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.