Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 08:58 UTC

wh1t3p1g / ysomap

A helpful Java Deserialization exploit framework.

JavaApache-2.0★ 1,249 stars⑂ 149 forkssince Feb 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

wh1t3p1g/ysomap holds a health index of 17 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (64/100) and lowest on Security (3/100). It was last updated 570 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

17
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

17
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

wh1t3P1gPersonal account
1,401 followers30 public repossince Dec 2015Never Stop Exploiting

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 570 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push570
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,010 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~180.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv0.1.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,010
mean_days_between_releases180.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.2/60Stars — 1,249 stars
18.1/25Forks — 149 forks
7.7/15Watchers — 25 watchers
Inputs used
forks149
stars1,249
watchers25
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.977
How it's scored
37/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
7.9/30PR acceptance — 11/42 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues2
closed_issues15
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.882
closed_unmerged_prs31
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
22.6/25Owner reach — 1,401 followers of wh1t3p1g
22.9/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,401
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginwh1t3p1g
public_repos30
account_age_days3,929
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava-deserialization, exploitation-framework
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

3Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestscli/pom.xml, common/pom.xml, core/pom.xml, pom.xml, thirdparty/pom.xml
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
How it's scored
1.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 19 affected: com.alibaba:hessian-lite 3.2.12 (critical 9.8), commons-collections:commons-collections 3.2.1 (critical 9.8), commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload 1.3.1 (critical 9.8), +16 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
8.4/40No advisories left outstanding — 18 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,885 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories94
affected_packages20
assessed_packages47
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitycritical 7, high 10, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages19
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 47 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
6.9/40Legible commit history — 13 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.13
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — cli/pom.xml, common/pom.xml, core/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscli/pom.xml, common/pom.xml, core/pom.xml, pom.xml, thirdparty/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/221 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes23,377
source_files_sampled221
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,249GitHub stars
6contributors
0commits, last 12 months
570days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch maven package 'ysomap:cli' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'ysomap:core' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'ysomap:common' from its registry
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/wh1t3p1g/ysomap: run: RepoClient.LocalPath: error during tarballHandler.setup: internal error: handler.httpClient.Do: Get "https://codeload.github.com/wh1t3p1g/ysomap/legacy.tar.gz/refs/heads/master": internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: error in HTTP: dial tcp: lookup codeload.github.com on 127.0.0.11:53: server misbehaving); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 149 ⇿
0Stars
149Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014772020-032023-012025-12
Major 0Minor 0Patch 5

Each point covers 6 days.

Direct dependencies 48
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavende.vandermeer:asciitable0.3.2cli/pom.xml
Mavende.vandermeer:ascii-utf-themes0.0.1cli/pom.xml
Mavenorg.reflections:reflections0.9.12cli/pom.xml
Mavenysomap:core0.1.1-SNAPSHOTcli/pom.xml
Mavenysomap:common0.1.1-SNAPSHOTcli/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jline:jline—common/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang3—common/pom.xml
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec—common/pom.xml
Mavenysomap:common0.1.1-SNAPSHOTcore/pom.xml
Mavenysomap:thirdparty0.1.1-SNAPSHOTcore/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind${jackson.version}core/pom.xml
Maven${hessian.group}:hessian${hessian.version}core/pom.xml
Mavencom.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream${xstream.version}core/pom.xml
Mavencom.alibaba:fastjson${fastjson.version}core/pom.xml
Mavencom.alibaba.fastjson2:fastjson22.0.23core/pom.xml
Mavencom.esotericsoftware:kryo-shaded${kryo.version}core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.javassist:javassist3.19.0-GAcore/pom.xml
Mavencom.nqzero:permit-reflect0.4core/pom.xml
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp4.8.1core/pom.xml
Mavencom.unboundid:unboundid-ldapsdk5.0.0core/pom.xml
Mavencom.caucho:quercus4.0.45core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-aop${spring.version}core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-web${spring.version}core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context${spring.version}core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-tx${spring.version}core/pom.xml
Mavenjavax.transaction:jta1.1core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.aspectj:aspectjweaver1.7.4core/pom.xml
Mavencommons-fileupload:commons-fileupload1.3.1core/pom.xml
Mavencommons-collections:commons-collections${cc.version}core/pom.xml
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils${cb.version}core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-collections44.0core/pom.xml
Mavenmysql:mysql-connector-java5.1.47core/pom.xml
Mavencom.rometools:rome1.7.0core/pom.xml
Mavencom.rometools:rome-utils1.7.0core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.xbean:xbean-naming4.20core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina8.0.36core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.tomcat:tomcat-dbcp7.0.47core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all2.1.9core/pom.xml
Mavencom.mchange:c3p00.9.5.5core/pom.xml
Mavencom.mchange:mchange-commons-java0.2.20core/pom.xml
Mavencastor:castor0.9.7core/pom.xml
Mavenxerces:xercesImpl2.9.1core/pom.xml
Mavennet.sourceforge.htmlunit:htmlunit-core-js2.55.0core/pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-all4.1.85.Finalcore/pom.xml
Mavencom.alibaba:hessian-lite3.2.12core/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jline:jline3.20.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.12.0pom.xml
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.15pom.xml
All dependencies 50

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 46 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencastor:castor0.9.7direct
Mavencom.alibaba.fastjson2:fastjson22.0.23direct
Mavencom.alibaba:fastjson1.2.58direct
Mavencom.alibaba:hessian-lite3.2.12direct
Mavencom.caucho:quercus4.0.45direct
Mavencom.esotericsoftware:kryo-shaded3.0.3direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.15.0direct
Mavencom.mchange:c3p00.9.5.5direct
Mavencom.mchange:mchange-commons-java0.2.20direct
Mavencom.nqzero:permit-reflect0.4direct
Mavencom.rometools:rome1.7.0direct
Mavencom.rometools:rome-utils1.7.0direct
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp4.8.1direct
Mavencom.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream1.4.7direct
Mavencom.unboundid:unboundid-ldapsdk5.0.0direct
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.7.0direct
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec—direct
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.15direct
Mavencommons-collections:commons-collections3.2.1direct
Mavencommons-fileupload:commons-fileupload1.3.1direct
Mavende.vandermeer:ascii-utf-themes0.0.1direct
Mavende.vandermeer:asciitable0.3.2direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-all4.1.85direct
Mavenjavax.transaction:jta1.1direct
Mavenmysql:mysql-connector-java5.1.47direct
Mavennet.sourceforge.htmlunit:htmlunit-core-js2.55.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-collections44.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang3—direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.12.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina8.0.36direct
Mavenorg.apache.tomcat:tomcat-dbcp7.0.47direct
Mavenorg.apache.xbean:xbean-naming4.20direct
Mavenorg.aspectj:aspectjweaver1.7.4direct
Mavenorg.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all2.1.9direct
Mavenorg.javassist:javassist3.19.0-GAdirect
Mavenorg.jline:jline—direct
Mavenorg.jline:jline3.20.0direct
Mavenorg.reflections:reflections0.9.12direct
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-aop4.3.16.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context4.3.16.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-tx4.3.16.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-web4.3.16.RELEASEdirect
Mavenxerces:xercesImpl2.9.1direct
Mavenysomap:common0.1.1-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenysomap:core0.1.1-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenysomap:thirdparty0.1.1-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavencom.caucho:hessian4.0.38indirect
Mavenjunit:junit4.12indirect
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.8.1indirect
Dependency advisories 20

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 47 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 20 carry known advisories, of which 19 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
com.alibaba:hessian-lite3.2.12directcritical13.2.13
commons-collections:commons-collections3.2.1directcritical24.1
commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload1.3.1directcritical411.0.0-M5
org.apache.commons:commons-collections44.0directcritical24.1
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina8.0.36directcritical1211.0.22
org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all2.1.9directcritical33.0.7
org.springframework:spring-web4.3.16.RELEASEdirectcritical76.1.14
com.alibaba:fastjson1.2.58directhigh11.2.83
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.15.0directhigh53.1.4
com.mchange:c3p00.9.5.5directhigh20.14.0
com.mchange:mchange-commons-java0.2.20directhigh20.6.0
com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp4.8.1directhigh14.9.2
com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream1.4.7directhigh351.4.21
commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.7.0directhigh22.0.0-M2
mysql:mysql-connector-java5.1.47directhigh48.2.0
org.springframework:spring-context4.3.16.RELEASEdirecthigh36.2.7
xerces:xercesImpl2.9.1directhigh52.12.2
castor:castor0.9.7directmoderate11.3.3
org.apache.commons:commons-lang33.12.0directmoderate13.18.0
junit:junit4.12indirectmoderate14.13.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.