Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 23:47 UTC

widefix / actual_db_schema

Keep DB schema in sync across branches effortlessly. Install and use rails db:migrate as normal. The gem handles the rest automatically.

RubyMIT★ 395 stars⑂ 19 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined

widefix/actual_db_schema holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (73/100) and lowest on Security (38/100). It was last updated 18 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WideFixOrganization
9 followers27 public repossince Aug 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsactual_db_schema0.9.2-2689 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 18 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume — 15 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push18
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 12 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 89 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~59 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv0.9.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release89
mean_days_between_releases59
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.1/60Stars — 395 stars
10.5/25Forks — 19 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks19
stars395
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.8/80Total downloads — 716,241 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesactual_db_schema
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads716,241
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 67% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.674
How it's scored
27.8/42Issue resolution — 66% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 89/98 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 16/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs89
open_issues29
closed_issues57
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.663
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of widefix
22.5/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginwidefix
public_repos27
account_age_days4,761

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 89 days ago
20/20Version history — 26 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesactual_db_schema
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish89

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

73Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
8/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://blog.widefix.com/actual-db-schema/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdbschema, migrations, rails
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://blog.widefix.com/actual-db-schema/
docs_sitehttps://blog.widefix.com/actual-db-schema/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 16/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 99 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
13/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: activesupport 7.1.1 (high 7.5), activerecord 7.1.1 (moderate)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
31.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 394 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories100
affected_packages21
assessed_packages75
unassessed_packages8
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 10, moderate 7, low 2
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 75 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.7/40Legible commit history — 65 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.65
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/67 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes17,612
source_files_sampled67
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

395GitHub stars
12contributors
15commits, last 12 months
18days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
29open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿
0Stars
19Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201932022-122024-092026-07
Major 0Minor 2Patch 10

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 23:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
4CI-Tests9 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 16/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities99 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsactiverecord~> 7.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsactivesupport~> 7.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest~> 5.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop~> 1.21Gemfile
All dependencies 83

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 76 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactiverecord—direct
RubyGemsactiverecord7.1.1direct
RubyGemsactivesupport—direct
RubyGemsactivesupport7.1.1direct
RubyGemsminitest5.20.0direct
RubyGemsrake13.1.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.57.2direct
RubyGemsactioncable7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsappraisal—indirect
RubyGemsappraisal2.5.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.2indirect
RubyGemsbase640.1.1indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.1.4indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.2.4indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.2.2indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemscsv—indirect
RubyGemscsv3.3.5indirect
RubyGemsdate3.3.3indirect
RubyGemsdebug—indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.1.1indirect
RubyGemserubi1.12.0indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.1indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsirb1.8.3indirect
RubyGemsjson2.6.3indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.3indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.21.4indirect
RubyGemsmail2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.4.4indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.5.9indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.15.4indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.23.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.2.2.4indirect
RubyGemsprism—indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsracc1.7.3indirect
RubyGemsrack3.0.8indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrails—indirect
RubyGemsrails7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrailties7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.5.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.8.2indirect
RubyGemsreline0.3.9indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.2.6indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.30.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemssqlite3—indirect
RubyGemssqlite31.6.8indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.0.8indirect
RubyGemsthor1.3.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.4.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.5.0indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.8.1indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.7.6indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.6.12indirect
Dependency advisories 21

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 75 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 21 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
activestorage7.1.1indirectcritical78.1.3.1
rack-session2.0.0indirectcritical22.1.2
activesupport7.1.1directhigh38.1.2.1
actionmailer7.1.1indirecthigh17.2.1.1
actionpack7.1.1indirecthigh68.0.0.1
actiontext7.1.1indirecthigh37.2.1.1
concurrent-ruby1.2.2indirecthigh31.3.7
nokogiri1.15.4indirecthigh171.19.4
rack3.0.8indirecthigh233.2.6
rexml3.2.6indirecthigh63.3.9
webrick1.8.1indirecthigh21.8.2
websocket-driver0.7.6indirecthigh40.8.2
activerecord7.1.1directmoderate18.0.2.1
loofah2.21.4indirectmoderate12.25.2
mail2.8.1indirectmoderate12.9.1
net-imap0.4.4indirectmoderate100.6.4.1
rails7.1.1indirectmoderate17.1.3.1
rdoc6.5.0indirectmoderate16.6.3.1
sqlite31.6.8indirectmoderate12.9.5
actionview7.1.1indirectlow18.1.2.1
rails-html-sanitizer1.6.0indirectlow61.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.