Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-21 16:49 UTC

win7user10 / Laraue.EfCoreTriggers

Library to write triggers in C# with EFCore

C#MIT★ 138 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Nov 2020View on GitHub ↗

win7user10/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (68/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ilya BelyanskyPersonal account
12 followers19 public repossince Feb 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

57Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
13/18Commit volume27 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year27
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases12 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 196 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~177 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tag10.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release196
mean_days_between_releases177
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.7/60Stars138 stars
11.5/25Forks25 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks25
stars138
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
63.5/80Total downloads1,286,504 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesLaraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySql, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Oracle, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.PostgreSql, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlLite, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlServer, Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Core, Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.MySql
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,286,504
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth12 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.87
How it's scored
30.2/42Issue resolution72% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance59/62 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs59
open_issues18
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.719
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8/25Owner reach12 followers of win7user10
21.5/25Track record19 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginwin7user10
public_repos19
account_age_days3,102
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history114 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesLaraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySql, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Oracle, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.PostgreSql, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlLite, Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlServer, Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Core, Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.MySql
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://laraue.com/blog/projects/ef-core-triggers
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstriggers, efcore, writing-triggers, csharp, orm, database
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://laraue.com/blog/projects/ef-core-triggers
docs_sitehttps://laraue.com/blog/projects/ef-core-triggers
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.2/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages15
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 15 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40Legible commit history44 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.44
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common.csproj, src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySql/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySql.csproj, src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Oracle/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Oracle.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestssrc/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common.csproj, src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySql/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySql.csproj, src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Oracle/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Oracle.csproj, src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.PostgreSql/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.PostgreSql.csproj, src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlLite/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlLite.csproj, src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlServer/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlServer.csproj, src/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Core/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Core.csproj, src/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.MySql/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.MySql.csproj, src/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.Oracle/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.Oracle.csproj, src/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.PostgreSql/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.PostgreSql.csproj, src/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.SqlServer/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.SqlServer.csproj, src/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.Sqlite/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Providers.Sqlite.csproj, tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySqlTests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.MySqlTests.csproj, tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.OracleTests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.OracleTests.csproj, tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.PostgreSqlTests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.PostgreSqlTests.csproj, tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlLiteTests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlLiteTests.csproj, tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlServerTests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.SqlServerTests.csproj, tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.TestMigration/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.TestMigration.csproj, tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Tests/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/347 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes11,838
source_files_sampled347
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

138GitHub stars
12contributors
27commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
18open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿
0Stars
25Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242422021-012023-102026-06
Major 1Minor 7Patch 3

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-21 16:49 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5CI-Tests4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore[10.0.0, 11.0.0)src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design[10.0.0, 11.0.0)src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational[10.0.0, 11.0.0)src/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common/Laraue.EfCoreTriggers.Common.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection[6.0.0, 11.0.0)src/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Core/Laraue.Linq2Triggers.Core.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 17 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCoredirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Designdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design10.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relationaldirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjectiondirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.1.0indirect
NuGetlinq2db.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Toolsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables10.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.0.0indirect
NuGetMoq4.16.1indirect
NuGetMySql.EntityFrameworkCoreindirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQLindirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL10.0.0indirect
NuGetOracle.EntityFrameworkCore10.23.26100indirect
NuGetxunit2.4.1indirect
NuGetxunit.categories2.0.5indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 15 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.