Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 12:44 UTC

winnow-rs / winnow

Making parsing a breeze

RustCustom license★ 953 stars⑂ 91 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

winnow-rs/winnow holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (67/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

winnow-rsOrganization

14 followers1 public reposince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	winnow	1.0.4	86,806,256	111	64 days ago	parser parsing streaming bit parser-combinators

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

87Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.8/36	Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 205 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	205
human_commit_share	0.87
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	33

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 64 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~44.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v1.0.4
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	64
mean_days_between_releases	44.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

77Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

68Good

How it's scored

48.3/60	Stars — 953 stars
16.3/25	Forks — 91 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	91
stars	953
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

71Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	coveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 86,806,256 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	winnow
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	902,109,225
monthly_downloads	86,806,256
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 61 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.465

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good

How it's scored

32.3/42	Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
27.2/30	PR acceptance — 531/586 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	531
open_issues	42
closed_issues	140
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.769
closed_unmerged_prs	55
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

48Weak

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
8.5/25	Owner reach — 14 followers of winnow-rs
9.5/25	Track record — 1 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	14
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	winnow-rs
public_repos	1
account_age_days	1,330

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 64 days ago
20/20	Version history — 111 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	winnow
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	64

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .clippy.toml, Cargo.toml ([lints], [workspace.lints])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

55Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/winnow
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.rs/winnow
docs_site	https://docs.rs/winnow
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

76Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

70Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 61 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
2.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	9
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	167
unassessed_packages	1
affected_by_severity	high 1, low 2, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 167 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 86 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.989
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .clippy.toml, Cargo.toml ([lints], [workspace.lints])
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.13

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
52.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 5/115 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	89,152
source_files_sampled	115
oversized_source_files	5

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

953GitHub stars

99contributors

205commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

2bus factor

42open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 91 ⇿

0Stars

91Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 3Patch 96

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10

7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 12:43 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 61 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3	Vulnerabilities	7 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 5

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	anstream	`0.6.15`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.48.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	memchr	`2.7`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	terminal_size	`0.4.3`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 168

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 163 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anstream	`0.6.15`	direct
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.8`	direct
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.48.1`	direct
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.6`	direct
crates.io	terminal_size	`0.4.3`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	anes	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	annotate-snippets	`0.11.4`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.100`	indirect
crates.io	arbitrary	`1.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	atty	`0.2.14`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	automod	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	bit-set	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	bit-vec	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytecount	`0.6.9`	indirect
crates.io	cast	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.39`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-io	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-ll	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	circular	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.3.24`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.3.24`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	criterion	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	criterion-plot	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.21`	indirect
crates.io	crunchy	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	diff	`0.1.13`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	escargot	`0.5.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	half	`2.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	handlebars	`4.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hermit-abi	`0.1.19`	indirect
crates.io	hermit-abi	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	is-terminal	`0.4.16`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.10.5`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.34`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.81`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	lexopt	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.176`	indirect
crates.io	libfuzzer-sys	`—`	indirect
crates.io	libfuzzer-sys	`0.4.10`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.28`	indirect
crates.io	normalize-line-endings	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.3`	indirect
crates.io	oorandom	`11.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	os_pipe	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	pest	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	pest_derive	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	pest_generator	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	pest_meta	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	plotters	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-backend	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-svg	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	pretty_assertions	`1.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.101`	indirect
crates.io	proptest	`1.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	quick-error	`1.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	quick-xml	`0.23.1`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.41`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	rand_xorshift	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`1.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.11.3`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.11`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	rusty-fork	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.145`	indirect
crates.io	sha2	`0.10.9`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	similar	`2.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	snapbox	`0.6.21`	indirect
crates.io	snapbox-macros	`0.3.10`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.23.0`	indirect
crates.io	term-transcript	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	termcolor	`1.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.17`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.17`	indirect
crates.io	tinytemplate	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.18.0`	indirect
crates.io	ucd-trie	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	unarray	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.19`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.1.13`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wait-timeout	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.14.4+wasi-0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.104`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-backend	`0.2.104`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.104`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.104`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.104`	indirect
crates.io	web-sys	`0.3.81`	indirect
crates.io	winapi	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.53.4`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.45.1`	indirect
crates.io	yansi	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.27`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.27`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 167 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
quick-xml	`0.23.1`	indirect	high	2	`0.41.0`
atty	`0.2.14`	indirect	low	3	—
rand	`0.8.5`	indirect	low	2	`0.10.1`
anyhow	`1.0.100`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.0.103`
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records