Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 08:16 UTC

wso2 / identity-customer-data-service

Lightweight, extensible Customer Data Server built to power personalized experiences through unified user profiles and behavior insights.

GoApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗

wso2/identity-customer-data-service holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WSO2Organization
1,716 followers382 public repossince Dec 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/wso2/identity-customer-data-servicev0.3.61-949 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume709 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year709
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year33
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases94 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~13 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count94
latest_release_tagv0.3.61
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases13

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
9.6/25Forks15 forks
9.1/15Watchers44 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars0
watchers44
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth12 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.596
How it's scored
16.2/42Issue resolution39% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance178/201 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs178
open_issues43
closed_issues27
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.386
closed_unmerged_prs23
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
23.3/25Owner reach1,716 followers of wso2
25/25Track record382 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,716
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginwso2
public_repos382
account_age_days5,691
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history94 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/wso2/identity-customer-data-service
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscustomer-data, iam
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories58
affected_packages6
assessed_packages74
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 2, moderate 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 74 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.1/40Legible commit history49 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.49
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes1/97 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes65,167
source_files_sampled97
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
12contributors
709commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
94releases
1bus factor
43open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿
0Stars
15Forks
91Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151422025-052025-112026-06
Major 0Minor 2Patch 60

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 08:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/go-stomp/stomp/v3v3.1.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.2.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.10.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/swaggo/swagv1.16.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-gov0.37.0go.mod
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driverv1.17.7go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
All dependencies 74

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 63 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/go-stomp/stomp/v3v3.1.5direct
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.2.2direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.10.9direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/swaggo/swagv1.16.6direct
Gogithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-gov0.37.0direct
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driverv1.17.7direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ansitermv0.0.0-20210617225240-d185dfc1b5a1indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4v4.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/logv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/platformsv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/dockercfgv0.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/referencev0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv28.0.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connectionsv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-unitsv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.8.2indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.2.6indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointerv0.19.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreferencev0.19.6indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/specv0.20.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swagv0.19.15indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/internv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.4indirect
Gogithub.com/kylebanks/depthv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9statsv0.0.0-20211012122336-39d0f177ccd0indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/propertiesv1.8.10indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.6indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/docker-image-specv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/patternmatcherv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/sequentialv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/userv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/usernsv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/termv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/morikuni/aecv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstatv0.0.0-20210106213030-5aafc221ea8cindirect
Gogithub.com/puerkitobio/purellv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/puerkitobio/urlescv0.0.0-20170810143723-de5bf2ad4578indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.25.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.3.12indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.1.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.49.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.35.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.35.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.35.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.35.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.35.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.6.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.39.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.32.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.21.1-0.20240508182429-e35e4ccd0d2dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20250519155744-55703ea1f237indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.6indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 74 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.37.0indirectcritical320.52.0
github.com/docker/dockerv28.0.1+incompatibleindirecthigh1029.3.1
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.35.0indirecthigh31.43.0
golang.org/x/netv0.39.0indirectmoderate111.26.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.32.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.24.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.