Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 22:23 UTC

xiaobaidadada / filecat

📂 Web File Browser | Server Manager | Server Ai Agent | 文件服务器 | 内网穿透

TypeScript · JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 98 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗

xiaobaidadada/filecat holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (30/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

xiaobaidadadaPersonal account
9 followers17 public repossince Mar 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmfilecat6.43.612,8164464 days agoai-agentcd-cihttppostlogfilebrowseradministratorfilemanagercpudockerlinuxrdprtspreactsshftpsysteminfovpnp2pddns

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume743 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year743
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year48
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases97 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count97
latest_release_tagv6.43.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases1.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.2/60Stars98 stars
8.7/25Forks12 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars98
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54.8/80Monthly downloads12,816 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfilecat
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads12,816
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.997
How it's scored
34.4/42Issue resolution82% of issues closed
15/30PR acceptance2/4 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues2
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.818
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
7.2/25Owner reach9 followers of xiaobaidadada
21.1/25Track record17 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginxiaobaidadada
public_repos17
account_age_days2,329
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history446 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfilecat
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsddns, docker, ftp-client, rdp-client, ssh-client, systeminfo, filebrowser, filemanager, administration, systemd, agent, ai, nodejs, proxy, remote-management, self-hosted, terminal, web-admin, log, logger
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories23
affected_packages6
assessed_packages7
unassessed_packages89
affected_by_severityhigh 5, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 7 resolved dependencies against OSV. 89 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes4/401 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes1,961,293
source_files_sampled401
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

98GitHub stars
3contributors
743commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
97releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index npm:filecat@6.43.6; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 22:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 96

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 96 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/core^8.0.1indirect
npm@babel/plugin-proposal-decorators^8.0.2indirect
npm@babel/preset-env^8.0.2 indirect
npm@babel/preset-react^8.0.1indirect
npm@babel/preset-typescript^8.0.1indirect
npm@excalidraw/excalidraw^0.18.1indirect
npm@larksuiteoapi/node-sdk^1.68.0indirect
npm@microsoft/fetch-event-source^2.0.1indirect
npm@types/better-sqlite3^7.6.13indirect
npm@types/node^26.0.0indirect
npm@wecom/aibot-node-sdk^1.0.7indirect
npm@xiaobaidadada/dockerode^4.0.9indirect
npm@xiaobaidadada/node-pty-prebuilt^1.1.0indirect
npm@xiaobaidadada/node-tuntap2-wintun^3.0.2indirect
npm@xiaobaidadada/prebuild^13.0.1-9indirect
npm@xiaobaidadada/ssh2-prebuilt^1.16.0indirect
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.10.0indirect
npm@xterm/xterm^5.5.0indirect
npmace-builds^1.32.9indirect
npmarchiver^7.0.1indirect
npmawesomplete^1.1.7indirect
npmaxios1.15.2indirect
npmbabel-loader^10.1.1indirect
npmbetter-sqlite3^12.6.2indirect
npmchart.js^4.4.2indirect
npmchokidar^4.0.3indirect
npmcookie-parser^1.4.7indirect
npmcopy-webpack-plugin^12.0.2indirect
npmcross-env^7.0.3indirect
npmcss-loader^6.10.0indirect
npmdiff^9.0.0indirect
npmdingtalk-stream^2.1.6-beta.1indirect
npmdocker-cli-js^2.10.0indirect
npmeventsource-parser^3.1.0indirect
npmfast-glob^3.3.3indirect
npmflexsearch^0.8.212indirect
npmfluent-ffmpeg^2.1.3indirect
npmflv.js^1.6.2indirect
npmfs-extra^11.2.0indirect
npmgithub-markdown-css^5.6.1indirect
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1indirect
npmhtml-webpack-plugin^5.6.6indirect
npmhttp-proxy-middleware3.0.5indirect
npmi18next^26.3.1indirect
npmiconv-lite^0.6.3indirect
npmjieba-wasm^2.4.0indirect
npmjotai^2.20.1indirect
npmlistr2^8.2.1indirect
npmlodash4.17.23indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.1.1indirect
npmmarkdown-it-emoji^3.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it-footnote^4.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it-sub^2.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it-sup^2.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it-task-lists^2.1.1indirect
npmmaterial-icons^1.13.12indirect
npmmime-types^2.1.35indirect
npmminizlib^3.1.0indirect
npmmustache^4.2.0indirect
npmneedle^3.3.1indirect
npmnode-cron^4.2.1indirect
npmnode-forge^1.3.1indirect
npmnode-loader^2.1.0indirect
npmnode-process-watcher^1.6.6indirect
npmnode-unrar-js^2.0.2indirect
npmnormalize.css^8.0.1indirect
npmnoty^3.2.0-beta-deprecatedindirect
npmpinyin-pro^3.28.0indirect
npmpty-shell1.5.4indirect
npmreact^19.2.7indirect
npmreact-dom^19.2.7indirect
npmreact-i18next^17.0.8indirect
npmreact-router-dom^7.18.0indirect
npmread-yaml-file^2.1.0indirect
npmreflect-metadata^0.2.1indirect
npmrimraf^5.0.5indirect
npmrouting-controllers^0.10.4indirect
npmsshpk^1.18.0indirect
npmstyle-loader^3.3.4indirect
npmsysteminformation5.31.0indirect
npmtar7.5.11indirect
npmterser-webpack-plugin^5.6.1indirect
npmtldts^6.1.20indirect
npmts-node^10.9.2indirect
npmtypescript^5.9.2indirect
npmunzip-stream^0.3.4indirect
npmvideo.js^8.17.2indirect
npmvideojs-hotkeys^0.2.28indirect
npmwebpack^5.96.1indirect
npmwebpack-bundle-analyzer^4.10.2indirect
npmwebpack-cli^5.1.4indirect
npmwebpack-dev-server^5.2.0indirect
npmwebpack-node-externals^3.0.0indirect
npmwindows-shortcuts^0.1.6indirect
npmws^8.16.0indirect
npmxxhashjs^0.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 7 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 89 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
axios1.15.2indirecthigh111.18.0
http-proxy-middleware3.0.5indirecthigh24.1.1
lodash4.17.23indirecthigh24.18.0
systeminformation5.31.0indirecthigh25.31.7
tar7.5.11indirecthigh57.5.19
markdown-it14.1.1indirectmoderate114.2.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.