Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 01:12 UTC

xybingbing / drone

drone 源码

Go · TypeScriptNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

xybingbing/drone holds a health index of 28 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (58/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (1/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

28
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

28
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 34 is calibrated to 28 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

xybingbingPersonal account
1 follower51 public repossince Dec 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/drone/dronepoints to another repo — not scoredv1.10.1-622031 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

45Weak
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 9 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18Commit volume — 7 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year7
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year5

Release discipline

48Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 99 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 807 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~23.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count99
latest_release_tagv3.0.0-beta.7
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release807
mean_days_between_releases23.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

1Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

1Critical
How it's scored
0/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

38Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.732

Ownership & stewardship

46Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of xybingbing
24.5/25Track record — 51 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginxybingbing
public_repos51
account_age_days4,227
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

24At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

15Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.harness.io/open-source
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.harness.io/open-source
docs_sitehttps://www.harness.io/open-source
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfiles — go.sum
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum
manifestsgo.mod
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configno

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

85Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/609 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes104,828
source_files_sampled609
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
100contributors
7commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
99releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/drone/drone' points at a different repository (https://github.com/drone/drone); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 48
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/766b/chi-prometheusv0.0.0-20211217152057-87afa9aa2ca8go.mod
Gogithub.com/99designs/httpsignatures-gov0.0.0-20170731043157-88528bf4ca7ego.mod
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-storage-blob-gov0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/govalidatorv0.0.0-20190424111038-f61b66f89f4ago.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.43.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-semverv0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/dchest/authcookiev0.0.0-20120917135355-fbdef6e99866go.mod
Gogithub.com/dchest/uniuriv0.0.0-20160212164326-8902c56451e9go.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/drone-gov1.7.2-0.20220308165842-f9e4fe31c2afgo.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/drone-runtimev1.1.1-0.20200623162453-61e33e2cab5dgo.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/drone-uiv2.12.0+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/drone-yamlv1.2.4-0.20220204000225-01fb17858c9bgo.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/envsubstv1.0.3-0.20200709231038-aa43e1c1a629go.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/funcmapv0.0.0-20210823160631-9e9dec149056go.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/go-licensev1.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/go-loginv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/go-scmv1.42.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/drone/signalv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chiv3.3.3+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/corsv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-redis/redis/v8v8.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-redsync/redsync/v4v4.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/mockv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-jsonnetv0.20.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/wirev0.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/gosimple/slugv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/h2non/gockv1.0.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.5.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lruv0.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/jmoiron/sqlxv0.0.0-20180614180643-0dae4fefe7c0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kelseyhightower/envconfigv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/oxtoacart/bpoolv0.0.0-20150712133111-4e1c5567d7c2go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cronv0.0.0-20180505203441-b41be1df6967go.mod
Gogithub.com/segmentio/ksuidv1.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/unrolled/securev0.0.0-20181022170031-4b6b7cf51606go.mod
Gogo.starlark.netv0.0.0-20221020143700-22309ac47eacgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.40.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.16.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with xybingbing/drone. Read them side by side →

100cilium/ciliumeBPF-based Networking, Security, and ObservabilityExceptional100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional100containerd/containerdAn open and reliable container runtimeExceptional100grafana/lokiLike Prometheus, but for logs.Exceptional100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.