Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-24 01:23 UTC

zap-proto / js

ZAP for TypeScript & JavaScript — @zap-proto/zap

TypeScriptCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

zap-proto/js holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (25/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

zap-protoOrganization
0 followers55 public repossince Jan 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@zap-proto/zap1.6.02001294 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
16.9/18Commit volume — 76 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year76
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 11 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recency — latest release 94 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv1.6.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release94
mean_days_between_releases0.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

25At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
30.7/80Monthly downloads — 200 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@zap-proto/zap
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads200
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 47 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.474
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of zap-proto
14/25Track record — 55 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginzap-proto
public_repos55
account_age_days240

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 94 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@zap-proto/zap
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish94

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://zap-proto.dev/docs/sdks/typescript
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://zap-proto.dev/docs/sdks/typescript
docs_sitehttps://zap-proto.dev/docs/sdks/typescript
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 47 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.3
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier75
security_posture_after_multiplier25
security_posture_before_jurisdiction33
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages5
assessed_packages194
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 2, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 194 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
18/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md (stub)
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 81 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.942
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes39,025
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
5contributors
76commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
11releases
2bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-24 01:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 47 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 194

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 194 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.7indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.5indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.62.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.62.0indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node22.19.21indirect
npm@types/whatwg-mimetype3.0.2indirect
npm@types/ws8.18.1indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.9indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbuffer-image-size0.6.4indirect
npmbundle-require5.1.0indirect
npmcac6.7.14indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmconfbox0.1.8indirect
npmconsola3.4.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmesbuild0.27.7indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfix-dts-default-cjs-exports1.0.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhappy-dom20.10.4indirect
npmjoycon3.1.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.3indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmload-tsconfig0.2.5indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmlly1.8.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpirates4.0.7indirect
npmpkg-types1.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmpostcss-load-config6.0.1indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmrollup4.62.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.7.6indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmsucrase3.35.1indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec0.3.2indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtsup8.5.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmufo1.6.4indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvitest4.1.9indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype3.0.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 194 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.12indirecthigh25.1.16
postcss8.5.15indirecthigh28.5.23
@vitest/mocker4.1.9indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
vitest4.1.9indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
esbuild0.27.7indirectlow10.28.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.