Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 16:29 UTC

zekroTJA / goup

🚀 A simple platform and shell agnostic installer and version manager for Go.

RustMIT★ 11 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

zekroTJA/goup holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (56/100) and lowest on Vitality (19/100). It was last updated 652 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 37 is calibrated to 31 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ringo HoffmannPersonal account
252 followers215 public repossince Jan 2016@studio-b12, @dev-schueppchen

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.iogoup1.7.0137821 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

19Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 652 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push652
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 9 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 821 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~55.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tagv1.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release821
mean_days_between_releases55.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

29At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars — 11 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars11
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
15.3/80Monthly downloads — 13 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgoup
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads10,581
monthly_downloads13
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.979
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 2/2 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues1
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.889
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.3/25Owner reach — 252 followers of zekroTJA
25/25Track record — 215 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers252
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginzekroTJA
public_repos215
account_age_days3,928
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 821 days ago
20/20Version history — 7 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgoup
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish821

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/goup
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli, go, installer, rust, tool, version-manager
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/goup
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate2.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
7.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: zip 2.1.3 (critical 9.1), tar 0.4.40 (high 8.1), anyhow 1.0.80 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
26.6/40No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 581 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories48
affected_packages17
assessed_packages188
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4, moderate 4, low 1, unknown 7
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 188 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
6.1/40Legible commit history — 11 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.115
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 96
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/29 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes11,056
source_files_sampled29
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

11GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
652days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.2 / 10
2.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 16:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioanyhow1.0.71Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.2.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole0.15.5Cargo.toml
crates.iodirectories5.0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0.26Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.17.8Cargo.toml
crates.ionom7.1.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.162Cargo.toml
crates.iospinoff0.8.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotar0.4.38Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3.5.0Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1.0.44Cargo.toml
crates.iowhattheshell1.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iozip2.1Cargo.toml
All dependencies 189

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 174 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow1.0.80direct
crates.ioclap4.5.1direct
crates.ioconsole0.15.8direct
crates.iodirectories5.0.1direct
crates.ioflate21.0.30direct
crates.ioindicatif0.17.8direct
crates.ionom7.1.3direct
crates.ioreqwest0.12.5direct
crates.ioserde1.0.197direct
crates.iospinoff0.8.0direct
crates.iotar0.4.40direct
crates.iotempfile3.10.1direct
crates.iothiserror1.0.61direct
crates.iowhattheshell1.1.0direct
crates.iozip2.1.3direct
crates.ioaddr2line0.21.0indirect
crates.ioadler1.0.2indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.13indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.3indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.0.2indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.2indirect
crates.ioarbitrary1.3.2indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.1.0indirect
crates.iobacktrace0.3.69indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.4.2indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.16.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.5.0indirect
crates.iocc1.0.89indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.1indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.5.0indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.0indirect
crates.iocolored2.1.0indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.4.2indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.5indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.20indirect
crates.ioderive_arbitrary1.3.2indirect
crates.iodirs-sys0.4.1indirect
crates.iodisplaydoc0.2.5indirect
crates.ioeither1.10.0indirect
crates.ioencode_unicode0.3.6indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.1indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.8indirect
crates.iofastrand2.0.1indirect
crates.iofiletime0.2.23indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.1indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.30indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.12indirect
crates.iogimli0.28.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.14.5indirect
crates.ioheck0.4.1indirect
crates.iohttp1.1.0indirect
crates.iohttp-body1.0.0indirect
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1.2indirect
crates.iohttparse1.8.0indirect
crates.iohyper1.4.0indirect
crates.iohyper-rustls0.27.2indirect
crates.iohyper-util0.1.6indirect
crates.ioidna0.5.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.2.6indirect
crates.ioinstant0.1.13indirect
crates.ioipnet2.9.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.10indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.69indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.4.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.153indirect
crates.iolibredox0.0.1indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.4.13indirect
crates.iolockfree-object-pool0.1.6indirect
crates.iolog0.4.21indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.4indirect
crates.iomime0.3.17indirect
crates.iominimal-lexical0.2.1indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.7.2indirect
crates.iomio0.8.11indirect
crates.iontapi0.4.1indirect
crates.ionumber_prefix0.4.0indirect
crates.ioobject0.32.2indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.19.0indirect
crates.iooption-ext0.2.0indirect
crates.iopaste1.0.15indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.1indirect
crates.iopin-project1.1.5indirect
crates.iopin-project-internal1.1.5indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.13indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.6.0indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.17indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.78indirect
crates.ioquinn0.11.2indirect
crates.ioquinn-proto0.11.3indirect
crates.ioquinn-udp0.5.2indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.35indirect
crates.iorand0.8.5indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.3.1indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.iorayon1.9.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.12.1indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.4.1indirect
crates.ioredox_users0.4.4indirect
crates.ioring0.17.8indirect
crates.iorustc-demangle0.1.23indirect
crates.iorustc-hash1.1.0indirect
crates.iorustix0.38.31indirect
crates.iorustls0.23.10indirect
crates.iorustls-pemfile2.1.2indirect
crates.iorustls-pki-types1.7.0indirect
crates.iorustls-webpki0.102.5indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.17indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.197indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.114indirect
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7.1indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.7indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.9indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.13.2indirect
crates.iosocket20.5.6indirect
crates.iospin0.9.8indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.0indirect
crates.iosubtle2.6.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.52indirect
crates.iosync_wrapper1.0.1indirect
crates.iosysinfo0.29.11indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.61indirect
crates.iotinyvec1.6.0indirect
crates.iotinyvec_macros0.1.1indirect
crates.iotokio1.36.0indirect
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26.0indirect
crates.iotower0.4.13indirect
crates.iotower-layer0.3.2indirect
crates.iotower-service0.3.2indirect
crates.iotracing0.1.40indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.27indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.32indirect
crates.iotry-lock0.2.5indirect
crates.iounicode-bidi0.3.15indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.12indirect
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1.23indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.1.11indirect
crates.iountrusted0.9.0indirect
crates.iourl2.5.0indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.1indirect
crates.iowant0.3.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.92indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-backend0.2.92indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futures0.4.42indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.92indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.92indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.92indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.69indirect
crates.iowebpki-roots0.26.3indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.4indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.4indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.4indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.4indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.4indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.4indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.4indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.4indirect
crates.iowinreg0.52.0indirect
crates.ioxattr1.3.1indirect
crates.iozeroize1.8.1indirect
crates.iozopfli0.8.1indirect
PyPIakane—indirect
Dependency advisories 17

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 188 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 17 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
zip2.1.3directcritical59.0.0
tar0.4.40directhigh50.4.46
quinn-proto0.11.3indirecthigh100.11.18
ring0.17.8indirecthigh20.17.12
rustls-webpki0.102.5indirecthigh80.104.0-alpha.7
bytes1.5.0indirectmoderate21.11.1
idna0.5.0indirectmoderate21.0.0
rustls0.23.10indirectmoderate30.23.46
tokio1.36.0indirectmoderate21.44.2
rand0.8.5indirectlow20.10.1
anyhow1.0.80directunknown11.0.103
adler1.0.2indirectunknown1—
crossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirectunknown10.9.20
instant0.1.13indirectunknown1—
number_prefix0.4.0indirectunknown1—
paste1.0.15indirectunknown1—
rustls-pemfile2.1.2indirectunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.