Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 12:48 UTC

zerocracy / fbe

FactBase Extended (FBE) for the judges in judges-action and inside Baza

RubyMIT★ 6 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗

zerocracy/fbe holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (40/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ZerocracyOrganization
89 followers12 public repossince Nov 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsfbe0.49.1-2040 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume413 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year413
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~23.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag0.49.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases23.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars6 stars
9.6/25Forks15 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars6
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.2/80Total downloads131,419 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfbe
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads131,419
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth17 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.572
How it's scored
40.5/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
27.3/30PR acceptance324/356 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 20/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs324
open_issues9
closed_issues241
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.964
closed_unmerged_prs32
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
14.1/25Owner reach89 followers of zerocracy
20.1/25Track record12 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers89
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginzerocracy
public_repos12
account_age_days3,517
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history204 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfbe
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://rubygems.org/gems/fbe
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsruby, ruby-gem, zerocracy
has_wikino
homepagehttps://rubygems.org/gems/fbe
docs_sitehttps://rubygems.org/gems/fbe
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 20/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/63 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes53,581
source_files_sampled63
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6GitHub stars
17contributors
413commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
9open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 12:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 20/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsminitest~>6.0Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest-mock~>5.27Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest-reporters~>1.7Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest-stub-const~>0.6Gemfile
RubyGemsos~>1.1Gemfile
RubyGemsqbash~>0.4Gemfile
RubyGemsrake13.4.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrdoc~>8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop~>1.75Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-elegant~>0.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest~>0.38Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-performance~>1.25Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rake~>0.7Gemfile
RubyGemssimplecov~>0.22Gemfile
RubyGemssimplecov-cobertura~>3.0Gemfile
RubyGemswebmock~>3.25Gemfile
RubyGemsyard~>0.9Gemfile
All dependencies 121

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 104 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6direct
RubyGemsminitest-mock5.27.0direct
RubyGemsminitest-reporters1.8.0direct
RubyGemsminitest-stub-const0.6direct
RubyGemsos1.1.4direct
RubyGemsqbash0.8.4direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.88.2direct
RubyGemsrubocop-elegant0.5.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest0.39.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1direct
RubyGemssimplecov0.22.0direct
RubyGemssimplecov-cobertura3.2.0direct
RubyGemswebmock3.26.2direct
RubyGemsyard0.9.44direct
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbacktraceindirect
RubyGemsbacktrace0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbaza.rbindirect
RubyGemsbaza.rb0.14.4indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.6indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdecoorindirect
RubyGemsdecoor0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsdocile1.4.1indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemselapsed0.3.1indirect
RubyGemsellipsizedindirect
RubyGemsellipsized0.3.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.4indirect
RubyGemsethon0.18.0indirect
RubyGemsfactbaseindirect
RubyGemsfactbase0.19.11indirect
RubyGemsfaradayindirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.2indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-http-cacheindirect
RubyGemsfaraday-http-cache2.7.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipartindirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retryindirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsfiber-storage1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsfilesizeindirect
RubyGemsfilesize0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsgli2.22.2indirect
RubyGemsgraphql2.6.3indirect
RubyGemsgraphql-clientindirect
RubyGemsgraphql-client0.26.0indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.8indirect
RubyGemsinterceptedindirect
RubyGemsintercepted0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsiri0.11.8indirect
RubyGemsjoinedindirect
RubyGemsjoined0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.20.0indirect
RubyGemsjudgesindirect
RubyGemsjudges0.60.3indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsliquidindirect
RubyGemsliquid5.12.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloogindirect
RubyGemsloog0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsmoments0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.3indirect
RubyGemsobkindirect
RubyGemsobk0.3.2indirect
RubyGemsoctokitindirect
RubyGemsoctokit10.0.0indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsothersindirect
RubyGemsothers0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsparallel2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.11.1indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.0.3indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsretries0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.49.1indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemssawyer0.9.3indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-html0.13.2indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_json_formatter0.1.4indirect
RubyGemssqlite3indirect
RubyGemssqlite32.9.4indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemstagoindirect
RubyGemstago0.7.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstotal0.4.2indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstyphoeus1.6.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsveilsindirect
RubyGemsveils0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsverboseindirect
RubyGemsverbose0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsyaml0.4.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.