Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 03:37 UTC

zoolutions / sidekiq-unique-jobs

Prevents duplicate Sidekiq jobs

RubyMIT★ 1,546 stars⑂ 292 forkssince Jul 2012View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#ruby#sidekiq#redis

zoolutions/sidekiq-unique-jobs holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (93/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (50/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Zoolutions LLCOrganization
1 follower16 public repossince Aug 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemssidekiq-unique-jobspoints to another repo — not scored8.1.0-164205 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
15.9/18Commit volume — 58 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year58
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

71Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 203 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~86.4 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 1 out of the last 1 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv9.0.0.alpha2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release203
mean_days_between_releases86.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

79Good
How it's scored
51.7/60Stars — 1,546 stars
20.5/25Forks — 292 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks292
stars1,546
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

65Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.868

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
40.3/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
24/30PR acceptance — 412/515 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs412
open_issues19
closed_issues445
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.959
closed_unmerged_prs103
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

42Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of zoolutions
9.3/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginzoolutions
public_repos16
account_age_days71

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

93Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://zoolutions.github.io/sidekiq-unique-jobs/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsruby, sidekiq, redis
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://zoolutions.github.io/sidekiq-unique-jobs/
docs_sitehttps://zoolutions.github.io/sidekiq-unique-jobs/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

61Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
2/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 1 out of the last 1 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages159
unassessed_packages48
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 159 resolved dependencies against OSV. 48 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 72 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.818
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes15,410

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 12 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.12

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/385 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes20,829
source_files_sampled385
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,546GitHub stars
99contributors
58commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
19open issues
npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • rubygems package 'sidekiq-unique-jobs' points at a different repository (https://github.com/mhenrixon/sidekiq-unique-jobs); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 292 ⇿
0Stars
292Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030028442013-012019-112026-09
Major 2Minor 2Patch 65

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 03:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 7/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
4SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases1 out of the last 1 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 51
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsbase64—Gemfile
RubyGemsbenchmark—Gemfile
RubyGemsbenchmark-ips—Gemfile
RubyGemsbenchmark-memory—Gemfile
RubyGemsbigdecimal—Gemfile
RubyGemsirb—Gemfile
RubyGemsmutex_m—Gemfile
RubyGemsostruct—Gemfile
RubyGemsappraisal—Gemfile
RubyGemsfaraday-retry—Gemfile
RubyGemsgithub-markup—Gemfile
RubyGemsrack-session—Gemfile
RubyGemsrack-test—Gemfile
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemsrspec—Gemfile
RubyGemsrspec-benchmark—Gemfile
RubyGemsrspec-html-matchers—Gemfile
RubyGemsrspec-its—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-performance—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rake—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec—Gemfile
RubyGemssimplecov-sublime>= 0.21.2Gemfile
RubyGemssinatra—Gemfile
RubyGemstimecop—Gemfile
RubyGemstoxiproxy—Gemfile
RubyGemsyard—Gemfile
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby-ext—Gemfile
RubyGemsfuubar—Gemfile
RubyGemsgithub_changelog_generator—Gemfile
RubyGemspry—Gemfile
RubyGemsredcarpet~> 3.4Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-prof>= 0.17.0Gemfile
RubyGemsstackprof>= 0.2.9Gemfile
RubyGemstest-prof—Gemfile
RubyGemsrails>= 8.1.0myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemspg—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemspropshaft—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemspuma—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsbootsnap—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsjson—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsredis—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemssidekiq—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemssidekiq-unique-jobs—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsimportmap-rails—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsstimulus-rails—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsturbo-rails—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsdaisyui—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsphlex-rails—myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemsrails_icons~> 1.9myapp/Gemfile
RubyGemstzinfo-data—myapp/Gemfile
All dependencies 207

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 65 direct and 142 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsappraisal—direct
RubyGemsbase64—direct
RubyGemsbase640.3.0direct
RubyGemsbenchmark—direct
RubyGemsbenchmark-ips—direct
RubyGemsbenchmark-memory—direct
RubyGemsbigdecimal—direct
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2direct
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.3direct
RubyGemsbootsnap1.26.0direct
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby-ext—direct
RubyGemsdaisyui1.3.1direct
RubyGemsfaraday-retry—direct
RubyGemsfuubar—direct
RubyGemsfuubar2.5.1direct
RubyGemsgithub-markup—direct
RubyGemsgithub_changelog_generator—direct
RubyGemsimportmap-rails2.2.3direct
RubyGemsirb—direct
RubyGemsirb1.18.0direct
RubyGemsjson3.0.2direct
RubyGemsmutex_m—direct
RubyGemsostruct—direct
RubyGemspg1.6.3direct
RubyGemsphlex-rails2.4.0direct
RubyGemspropshaft1.3.2direct
RubyGemspry—direct
RubyGemspry0.16.0direct
RubyGemspuma8.0.2direct
RubyGemsrack-session—direct
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2direct
RubyGemsrack-test—direct
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0direct
RubyGemsrails8.1.3.1direct
RubyGemsrails8.1.4direct
RubyGemsrails_icons1.9.0direct
RubyGemsrake—direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemsredcarpet—direct
RubyGemsredis6.0.0direct
RubyGemsrspec—direct
RubyGemsrspec-benchmark—direct
RubyGemsrspec-html-matchers—direct
RubyGemsrspec-its—direct
RubyGemsrubocop—direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.90.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.91.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop-performance—direct
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.27.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rake—direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec—direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2direct
RubyGemsruby-prof—direct
RubyGemssidekiq—direct
RubyGemssidekiq8.1.7direct
RubyGemssimplecov-sublime—direct
RubyGemssinatra—direct
RubyGemsstackprof—direct
RubyGemsstimulus-rails1.3.4direct
RubyGemstest-prof—direct
RubyGemstimecop—direct
RubyGemstoxiproxy—direct
RubyGemsturbo-rails2.0.23direct
RubyGemsyard—direct
npm@hotwired/stimulus^3.2.2indirect
npm@hotwired/turbo-rails^8.0.20indirect
npm@tailwindcss/cli^4.1.18indirect
npm@tailwindcss/cli^4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms^0.5.11indirect
npm@tailwindcss/typography^0.5.19indirect
npmdaisyui^5.5.14indirect
npmdaisyui^5.7.47indirect
npmtailwindcss^4.1.18indirect
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3indirect
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.19indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbindex0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbrakeman8.0.6indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit0.9.3indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.40.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara-playwright-driver0.5.10indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker2.10.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby—indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.7indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdocs-kit1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsdotenv3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdotenv-rails3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.7indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot6.5.6indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails6.5.1indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsicons0.9.0indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.4indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.2indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2026.0701indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmsgpack1.8.4indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.6indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.7indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.2indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsparallel2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.12.0indirect
RubyGemsphlex2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsplaywright-ruby-client1.62.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspry-rails0.3.11indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.7indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake-compiler-dock1.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrb_sys0.9.130indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.1.0indirect
RubyGemsredis-client0.30.1indirect
RubyGemsrefract1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.13.1indirect
RubyGemsreline0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrouge5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-rails8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.37.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.38.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails-omakase1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsthor—indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsthruster0.1.26indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.3.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemsweb-console4.3.0indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 159 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 48 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with zoolutions/sidekiq-unique-jobs. Read them side by side →

92sidekiq/sidekiqSimple, efficient background processing for RubyExcellent99opf/openprojectOpenProject is the leading open source project management software for product, project and portfolio management. A powerful Jira alternative with agile planning, issue tracking, roadmaps, Gantt charts, time tracking, collaboration features, and more. Available on premises or in the cloud. ⭐ Star us on GitHubExceptional98chatwoot/chatwootOpen-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬Exceptional98svix/svix-webhooksThe open source and enterprise-ready webhooks service 🦀Exceptional98open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ruby-contribContrib Packages for the OpenTelemetry Ruby API and SDK implementation.Exceptional98rails/railsRuby on RailsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.