Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 15:04 UTC

AbdoKnbGit / tau

You’re adaptive AI assistant for your work.

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 307 stars⑂ 40 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

AbdoKnbGit/tau holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Security (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AbdoKnbGitPersonal account
19 followers16 public repossince Feb 2026

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@abdoknbgit/tau0.92.282,504690 days agotauaiclimulti-provideropenaigeminiollamagroqdeepseekglmbigmodelcoding-assistant

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume400 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year400
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases20 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv0.92.28
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.3/60Stars307 stars
13.3/25Forks40 forks
4.3/15Watchers7 watchers
Inputs used
forks40
stars307
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.3/80Monthly downloads2,504 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@abdoknbgit/tau
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,504
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
40.3/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
24/30PR acceptance4/5 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs4
open_issues1
closed_issues24
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.96
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
9.4/25Owner reach19 followers of AbdoKnbGit
10/25Track record16 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers19
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginAbdoKnbGit
public_repos16
account_age_days191
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history69 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@abdoknbgit/tau
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent, anthropic, antigravity, api, claudecode, cli, copilot, free, gemini, kilo-code, kiro, nvidia, ollama, open-source, tau, cline-ai, monitoring, orchestrator, openrouter, open-source-ai
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
1/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities148 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: sharp 0.34.5 (high 7.3)
8.8/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: minimatch 10.0.1 (high 7.5), @opentelemetry/core 2.0.0 (moderate 5.3)
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 198 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages3
assessed_packages456
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the npm:@abdoknbgit/tau@0.92.28 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 456 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.7/40Legible commit history65 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.65
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapnative/shell-parser/go.mod, native/tau-tools/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingeditors/vscode/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configseditors/vscode/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsnative/shell-parser/go.mod, native/tau-tools/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
52.8/55Manageable file sizes101/2,571 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes810,435
source_files_sampled2,571
oversized_source_files101
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

307GitHub stars
1contributors
400commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'tau-vscode' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 40 ⇿
0Stars
40Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030404032026-042026-062026-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 11
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 15:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities148 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 80
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@agentclientprotocol/sdk^0.26.0package.json
npm@alcalzone/ansi-tokenize^0.1.3package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.50.1package.json
npm@aws-sdk/client-bedrock-runtime^3.700.0package.json
npm@commander-js/extra-typings^12.1.0package.json
npm@growthbook/growthbook^1.4.3package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.12.1package.json
npm@opentelemetry/api^1.9.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/api-logs^0.200.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/core^2.0.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/resources^2.0.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-logs^0.200.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics^2.0.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base^2.0.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.30.0package.json
npm@vscode/tree-sitter-wasm^0.3.1package.json
npm@vtsls/language-server^0.3.0package.json
npm@whiskeysockets/baileys7.0.0-rc12package.json
npmajv^8.17.1package.json
npmasciichart^1.5.25package.json
npmauto-bind^5.0.1package.json
npmaxios^1.7.9package.json
npmbash-language-server^5.6.0package.json
npmbidi-js^1.0.3package.json
npmchalk^5.4.1package.json
npmchokidar^4.0.3package.json
npmcli-boxes^3.0.0package.json
npmcode-excerpt^4.0.0package.json
npmcommander~12.1.0package.json
npmdiff^8.0.4package.json
npmdotenv^17.4.2package.json
npmemoji-regex^10.4.0package.json
npmenv-paths^3.0.0package.json
npmexeca^9.5.2package.json
npmfflate^0.8.2package.json
npmfigures^6.1.0package.json
npmfuse.js^7.0.0package.json
npmget-east-asian-width^1.3.0package.json
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1package.json
npmhttps-proxy-agent^7.0.6package.json
npmignore^7.0.3package.json
npmindent-string^5.0.0package.json
npmjsonc-parser^3.3.1package.json
npmlodash-es^4.17.21package.json
npmlru-cache^11.0.2package.json
npmmarked^15.0.7package.json
npmp-map^7.0.3package.json
npmpdfkit^0.18.0package.json
npmpicomatch^4.0.2package.json
npmpino^9.0.0package.json
npmproper-lockfile^4.1.2package.json
npmpyright^1.1.410package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4package.json
npmqrcode-terminal^0.12.0package.json
npmreact~19.1.0package.json
npmreact-reconciler~0.32.0package.json
npmsemver^7.6.3package.json
npmshell-quote^1.8.2package.json
npmsignal-exit^4.1.0package.json
npmsharp^0.34.5package.json
npmsixel^0.16.0package.json
npmstack-utils^2.0.6package.json
npmstrip-ansi^7.1.0package.json
npmsupports-hyperlinks^3.1.0package.json
npmtree-kill^1.2.2package.json
npmturndown^7.2.4package.json
npmtype-fest^4.32.0package.json
npmundici^7.3.0package.json
npmusehooks-ts^3.1.1package.json
npmvscode-jsonrpc^8.2.1package.json
npmvscode-langservers-extracted^4.10.0package.json
npmvscode-languageserver-protocol^3.17.5package.json
npmvscode-languageserver-types^3.17.5package.json
npmweb-tree-sitter^0.26.9package.json
npmwrap-ansi^9.0.0package.json
npmws^8.18.0package.json
npmxss^1.0.15package.json
npmyaml-language-server^1.23.0package.json
npmzod^3.25.0package.json
npmws^8.18.0tau-vscode/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 3

Installing npm:@abdoknbgit/tau@0.92.28 pulls in 456 packages, direct and transitive: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sharp0.34.5directhigh10.35.0
minimatch10.0.1indirecthigh310.2.3
@opentelemetry/core2.0.0indirectmoderate12.8.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.