Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-25 09:59 UTC

CyberMind-FR / secubox-deb

SecuBox-DEB and SBXOS : Debian 13 Trixie System Security Appliance and Sovereign Hosting

Python · HTML · GoCustom license★ 2 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMobile applicationNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (21/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CyberMind.FROrganization · verified domain
4 followers113 public repossince Jan 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 7,174 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year7,174
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year32
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.0.0-alpha.18
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases1.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

21At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 75% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.747
How it's scored
29/42Issue resolution — 69% of issues closed
29.8/30PR acceptance — 1,606/1,616 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,606
open_issues482
closed_issues1,072
prs_merged_7d58
prs_decided_7d60
prs_merged_30d58
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.69
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of CyberMind-FR
22.5/25Track record — 113 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginCyberMind-FR
public_repos113
account_age_days1,739

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 23 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml, tools/secubox-webllm/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://secubox.in
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdebian, operating-system, security, security-tools, soc, waf
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://secubox.in
docs_sitehttps://secubox.in
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

26At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
1.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 236 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-egress/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-mesh-bt/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-mesh/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-netboot/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-toolbox/CLAUDE.md, remote-ui/round/CLAUDE.md, remote-ui/square/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-egress/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-mesh-bt/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-mesh/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-netboot/CLAUDE.md, packages/secubox-toolbox/CLAUDE.md, remote-ui/round/CLAUDE.md, remote-ui/square/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes30,738
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — daemon/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-led-heartbeat/kmod/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/vendor/go.etcd.io/bbolt/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml, tools/secubox-webllm/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black])
11/11Static type checking — packages/sbxos-audio-mood/tsconfig.json, packages/secubox-sbxos/app/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 45 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdaemon/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-bbs/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-led-heartbeat/kmod/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-metanews/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/gc/v3/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/sqlite/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/strutil/Makefile, packages/secubox-radio/vendor/modernc.org/token/Makefile, packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/vendor/go.etcd.io/bbolt/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/sbxos-audio-mood/tsconfig.json, packages/secubox-sbxos/app/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.45
toolchain_manifestsclients/android-toolbox/app/build.gradle.kts, clients/android-toolbox/build.gradle.kts, cmd/secubox/go.mod, daemon/go.mod, packages/sbxos-audio-mood/go.mod, packages/secubox-bbs/go.mod, packages/secubox-dpi/collector/go.mod, packages/secubox-federation/go.mod, packages/secubox-metanews/go.mod, packages/secubox-radio/go.mod, packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/go.mod, secubox-companion/android/app/build.gradle, secubox-companion/android/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (packages/sbxos-audio-mood/tsconfig.json, packages/secubox-sbxos/app/tsconfig.json)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 27/3,514 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes413,952
source_files_sampled3,514
oversized_source_files27
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — demos, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

2GitHub stars
4contributors
7,174commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
482open issues
Go, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/cybermind/secubox-deb' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb/cmd/secubox' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb/secubox-bbs' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb/secubox-radio' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb/sbxos-audio-mood' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb/secubox-metanews' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb/secubox-federation' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/CyberMind-FR/secubox-deb/secubox-toolbox-ng' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'secubox-eye-gateway' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-052026-052026-05
Major 0Minor 5Patch 4
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-25 09:58 UTC

2Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities236 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 45
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/grandcat/zeroconfv1.0.0daemon/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.8.0daemon/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1daemon/go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.29.5daemon/go.mod
Gogithub.com/manifoldco/promptuiv0.9.0cmd/secubox/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.8.0cmd/secubox/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.18.0cmd/secubox/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1cmd/secubox/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3packages/sbxos-audio-mood/go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.29.10packages/sbxos-audio-mood/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.23.0packages/secubox-bbs/go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.29.10packages/secubox-bbs/go.mod
PyPIfastapi==0.115.6packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn==0.34.0packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic==2.10.4packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite==0.20.0packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2==3.1.5packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIargon2-cffi==23.1.0packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPInh3==0.2.20packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx==0.28.1packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyotp==2.9.0packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
PyPIitsdangerous==2.2.0packages/secubox-billets/pyproject.toml
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1packages/secubox-federation/go.mod
PyPIfastapi>=0.110packages/secubox-mesh/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.27packages/secubox-mesh/pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1packages/secubox-mesh/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.6packages/secubox-mesh/pyproject.toml
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.29.10packages/secubox-metanews/go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.29.10packages/secubox-radio/go.mod
npm@fontsource/orbitron^5.2.8packages/secubox-sbxos/package.json
npmframer-motion12.23.24packages/secubox-sbxos/package.json
npmreact19.2.0packages/secubox-sbxos/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.0packages/secubox-sbxos/package.json
npmzustand5.0.8packages/secubox-sbxos/package.json
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.0.6packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.4packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/go.mod
Gogithub.com/refraction-networking/utlsv1.6.7packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.3.11packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.23.0packages/secubox-toolbox-ng/go.mod
PyPIfastapi>=0.110packages/secubox-toolbox/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.27packages/secubox-toolbox/pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1packages/secubox-toolbox/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.6packages/secubox-toolbox/pyproject.toml
PyPIqrcode>=7.4packages/secubox-toolbox/pyproject.toml
PyPIplaywright>=1.40tools/secubox-webllm/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.