Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 04:26 UTC

DamianEdwards / RazorSlices

Lightweight Razor-based templates for ASP.NET Core without MVC, Razor Pages, or Blazor.

HTML · C#MIT★ 584 stars⑂ 28 forkssince Mar 2023View on GitHub ↗

DamianEdwards/RazorSlices holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on Security (54/100). It was last updated 23 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Damian EdwardsPersonal account
3,828 followers122 public repossince Apr 2010@microsoft

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetRazorSlices0.11.3-2523 days agoasp.netwebminimalapisiresultrazortemplatingtemplates

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 23 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year22
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push23
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 31 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 23 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~19.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv0.11.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release23
mean_days_between_releases19.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.9/60Stars — 584 stars
11.9/25Forks — 28 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks28
stars584
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
58.7/80Total downloads — 449,706 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesRazorSlices
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads449,706
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.94
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
28.9/30PR acceptance — 52/54 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs52
open_issues11
closed_issues71
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.866
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach — 3,828 followers of DamianEdwards
25/25Track record — 122 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,828
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginDamianEdwards
public_repos122
account_age_days5,986
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 23 days ago
20/20Version history — 25 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesRazorSlices
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish23

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 24 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 24 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories18
affected_packages7
assessed_packages101
unassessed_packages11
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 101 resolved dependencies against OSV. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
28.8/40Legible commit history — 54 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.54
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,293
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — samples/PagesAndSlices/PagesAndSlices.csproj, samples/RazorClassLibrary/RazorClassLibrary.csproj, samples/WebApp/WebApp.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 14 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.14
toolchain_manifestssamples/PagesAndSlices/PagesAndSlices.csproj, samples/RazorClassLibrary/RazorClassLibrary.csproj, samples/WebApp/WebApp.csproj, src/RazorSlices/RazorSlices.csproj, src/SourceGenerator/SourceGenerator.csproj, tests/Benchmarks/Benchmarks.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.CompilerLiteralsUtf16/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.CompilerLiteralsUtf16.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.CompilerLiteralsUtf8/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.CompilerLiteralsUtf8.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.Local/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.Local.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.PreviousVersion/Benchmarks.RazorClassLibrary.PreviousVersion.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.RazorSlices.NoUtf8LiteralOverload/Benchmarks.RazorSlices.NoUtf8LiteralOverload.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.WebApp.Blazor/Benchmarks.WebApp.Blazor.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorComponents/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorComponents.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorPages/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorPages.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorSlicesLocal/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorSlicesLocal.csproj, tests/BenchmarksWebApps/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorSlicesPreviousVersion/Benchmarks.WebApp.RazorSlicesPreviousVersion.csproj, tests/ProfilingHarness/ProfilingHarness.csproj, tests/RazorSlices/RazorSlices.Tests.csproj, tests/Samples.WebApp.PublishTests/Samples.WebApp.PublishTests.csproj, tests/Samples.WebApp/Samples.WebApp.csproj, tests/SourceGenerator/SourceGenerator.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HTML without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/97 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes55,744
source_files_sampled97
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

584GitHub stars
5contributors
22commits, last 12 months
23days since last push
31releases
1bus factor
11open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 28 ⇿
0Stars
28Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302732023-042024-122026-08
Major 0Minor 7Patch 11

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 04:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests24 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub—src/RazorSlices/RazorSlices.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—src/SourceGenerator/SourceGenerator.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—src/SourceGenerator/SourceGenerator.csproj
All dependencies 112

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 109 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub—direct
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.0.0indirect
npm@eslint/js8.35.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.11.8indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema1.2.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@popperjs/core2.11.6indirect
npmacorn8.8.2indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbootstrap5.2.3indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.35.0indirect
npmeslint-scope7.1.1indirect
npmeslint-utils3.0.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys2.1.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.3.0indirect
npmespree9.4.1indirect
npmesquery1.5.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.15.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.0.4indirect
npmflatted3.2.7indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.20.0indirect
npmgrapheme-splitter1.0.4indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.2.4indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjquery3.6.3indirect
npmjs-sdsl4.3.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.1indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.0indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmregexpp3.2.0indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.3indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector—indirect
NuGetMartinCostello.Logging.XUnit—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—indirect
NuGetRazorSlices—indirect
NuGetxunit—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 101 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
flatted3.2.7indirectcritical23.4.2
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
cross-spawn7.0.3indirecthigh17.0.5
js-yaml4.1.0indirecthigh54.3.2
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
ajv6.12.6indirectmoderate18.18.0
word-wrap1.2.3indirectmoderate11.2.4

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.