Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 07:46 UTC

DedSecInside / TorBot

Dark Web OSINT Tool

PythonCustom license★ 4,726 stars⑂ 737 forkssince May 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#tor#tor-network#deepweb#dark-web#psnappz#crawler#spider#dedsec-inside#python-web-crawler#security-tools#security#python3#python#algorithm#osint#go#projects#hacking#torbot#hacktoberfest

DedSecInside/TorBot holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DedSec InsideOrganization
248 followers10 public repossince Jul 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPItorbot4.3.0352730 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18Commit volume — 63 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year63
human_commit_share0.81
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

76Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 30 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~194.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv4.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases194.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

95Exceptional
How it's scored
59.6/60Stars — 4,726 stars
23.9/25Forks — 737 forks
11.7/15Watchers — 127 watchers
Inputs used
forks737
stars4,726
watchers127
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

66Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 38 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled38
top_contributor_share0.518

Issue & PR responsiveness

65Good
How it's scored
40.2/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
24.8/30PR acceptance — 218/264 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs218
open_issues5
closed_issues109
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.956
closed_unmerged_prs46
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2

Ownership & stewardship

67Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.2/25Owner reach — 248 followers of DedSecInside
19.6/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers248
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginDedSecInside
public_repos10
account_age_days3,700

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history — 7 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestorbot
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstor, tor-network, deepweb, dark-web, psnappz, crawler, spider, dedsec-inside, python-web-crawler, security-tools, security, python3, python, algorithm, osint, go, projects, hacking, torbot, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages43
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:torbot@4.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 43 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27/40Legible commit history — 41 of 81 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.506
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 19 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.19

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes18,656
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4,726GitHub stars
38contributors
63commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
5open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 737 ⇿
0Stars
737Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375500625750718192017-072022-022026-08
Major 2Minor 4Patch 5

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 07:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaltgraph>=0.17.4pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.12.3pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi>=2024.7.4pyproject.toml
PyPIcharset-normalizer>=3.3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIdecorator>=5.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIidna>=3.15pyproject.toml
PyPIigraph>=0.11.4pyproject.toml
PyPIjoblib>=1.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPImacholib>=1.16.3pyproject.toml
PyPIprogress>=1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpyinstaller>=6.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyinstaller-hooks-contrib>=2024.6pyproject.toml
PyPIPySocks>=1.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIscikit-learn>=1.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsix>=1.16.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsoupsieve>=2.8.4pyproject.toml
PyPItermcolor>=2.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPItexttable>=1.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIthreadpoolctl>=3.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3>=2.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIvalidators>=0.22.0pyproject.toml
PyPItreelib>=1.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26.4pyproject.toml
PyPIunipath>=1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27.0pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate>=0.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIphonenumbers>=8.13.37pyproject.toml
PyPIpytest>=9.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIyattag>=1.15.2pyproject.toml
PyPItoml>=0.10.2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 77

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 64 direct and 13 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaltgraph—direct
PyPIaltgraph0.17.4direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup4—direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.12.3direct
PyPIcertifi—direct
PyPIcertifi2024.7.4direct
PyPIcharset-normalizer—direct
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.3.2direct
PyPIdecorator—direct
PyPIdecorator5.1.1direct
PyPIhttpx—direct
PyPIhttpx0.27.0direct
PyPIidna—direct
PyPIidna3.15direct
PyPIigraph—direct
PyPIigraph0.11.4direct
PyPIjoblib—direct
PyPIjoblib1.4.2direct
PyPImacholib—direct
PyPImacholib1.16.3direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPInumpy1.26.4direct
PyPIphonenumbers—direct
PyPIphonenumbers8.13.37direct
PyPIprogress—direct
PyPIprogress1.6direct
PyPIpyinstaller—direct
PyPIpyinstaller6.8.0direct
PyPIpyinstaller-hooks-contrib—direct
PyPIpyinstaller-hooks-contrib2024.6direct
PyPIpysocks—direct
PyPIpysocks1.7.1direct
PyPIpytest—direct
PyPIpytest9.0.3direct
PyPIpython-dotenv—direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2direct
PyPIscikit-learn—direct
PyPIscikit-learn1.5.0direct
PyPIscipy—direct
PyPIscipy1.13.0direct
PyPIsix—direct
PyPIsix1.16.0direct
PyPIsoupsieve—direct
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4direct
PyPItabulate—direct
PyPItabulate0.9.0direct
PyPItermcolor—direct
PyPItermcolor2.4.0direct
PyPItexttable—direct
PyPItexttable1.7.0direct
PyPIthreadpoolctl—direct
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.5.0direct
PyPItoml—direct
PyPItoml0.10.2direct
PyPItreelib—direct
PyPItreelib1.7.1direct
PyPIunipath—direct
PyPIunipath1.1direct
PyPIurllib3—direct
PyPIurllib32.7.0direct
PyPIvalidators—direct
PyPIvalidators0.22.0direct
PyPIyattag—direct
PyPIyattag1.15.2direct
PyPIanyio4.3.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.0indirect
PyPIpefile2023.2.7indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsocksio1.0.0indirect
PyPItomli2.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:torbot@4.3.0 pulls in 43 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with DedSecInside/TorBot. Read them side by side →

99prowler-cloud/prowlerProwler is the world’s most widely used open-source cloud security platform that automates security and compliance across any cloud environment.Exceptional98bloomberg/memrayMemray is a memory profiler for PythonExceptional100openfga/openfgaA high performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google ZanzibarExceptional98Checkmarx/kicsFind security vulnerabilities, compliance issues, and infrastructure misconfigurations early in the development cycle of your infrastructure-as-code with KICS by Checkmarx.Exceptional100huggingface/transformers🤗 Transformers: the model-definition framework for state-of-the-art machine learning models in text, vision, audio, and multimodal models, for both inference and training. Exceptional100go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.